public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: slush <slush@centrum•cz>
To: Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr•org>
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] IRC meeting agenda, 18:00 UTC Thursday
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 19:56:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJna-Hh3+CChAXeEgjzOvHiamOAUY2da9iQb4AcaxYynp6GJyg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201211061913.35016.luke@dashjr.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1217 bytes --]

On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr•org> wrote:

> But more important to the success of BIP today, I think, is encouraging
> wider
> community participation.


It's not about BIP process, it's possibly about content of particular
proposals.


> The stratum mining mess seems to be a direct result


There's no mess with stratum mining, except in your head. There's no
requirement to have BIP for everything what people do. Stratum is NOT
related to bitcoin protocol or bitcoin implementation, it is just custom,
pooled-mining extension and bitcoin network doesn't need to know about
Stratum existence at all.


> and lack of any peer review/contribution toward the stratum protocol.


There have been peer review of the protocol. You wanted to say "I was not
invited to do peer review", right?

Please don't start it AGAIN and stop bashing Stratum in your posts, at
least in bitcoin-dev mailing list.

I promised to write BIP draft for Stratum, I proposed and implemented
get_transactions method to allow Stratum jobs inspection. What more do you
want, seriously? I'm soo tired by you, Luke.

slush

P.S. I'm sorry that other developers had to read such posts. I'll try to
sit on my hands next time.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1940 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-06 20:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-06 18:47 Gavin Andresen
2012-11-06 19:13 ` Luke-Jr
2012-11-06 19:56   ` slush [this message]
2012-11-06 22:12     ` Luke-Jr
2012-11-07 19:37 ` Pieter Wuille
2012-11-08  9:19   ` Mike Hearn
2012-11-08 12:56     ` Pieter Wuille
2012-11-08 13:07     ` Gregory Maxwell
     [not found]     ` <CA+s+GJDVLLv8troMfeyWoOwM3EH4GHYtd=bzUgmg_ZegVT6kXw@mail.gmail.com>
2012-11-08 13:10       ` [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: " Wladimir

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJna-Hh3+CChAXeEgjzOvHiamOAUY2da9iQb4AcaxYynp6GJyg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=slush@centrum$(echo .)cz \
    --cc=bitcoin-development@lists$(echo .)sourceforge.net \
    --cc=luke@dashjr$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox