Oh, now I got the 'soft-fork' alternative. If that means that *senders* to Trezor need to be nice guys and use some special outputs, then it's, obviously, no-go solution.

I understand political aspect around hard-fork. Anyway, are there any other pending projects waiting for hard-fork? Maybe we should join our effort in some way.

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Alan Reiner <etotheipi@gmail.com> wrote:

I am happy to entertain other ideas that achieve our goals here, but I'm
fairly confident that the new SIGHASH type is the only way that would
allow devices like Trezor to truly simplify their design (and still work
securely on 100% of funds contained by the wallet).

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development