On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Andreas Schildbach wrote: > On 04/08/2014 05:46 PM, slush wrote: > > > It still doesn't mean that bitcoinj or Electrum cannot share the bare > > minimum of BIP XX. Of course if somebody will use Electrum for 2to3 > > transactions and then move wallet to client which does not offer such > > feature, it won't work. But I don't see that as a problem. > > There is no "bare minimum". Either you implement the "BIP" fully or not. > I didn't mean "Bare minimum of some spec", but "spec describing bare minimum", which is different. I'm sorry for confusion. Marek