public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail•com>
To: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail•com>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] smart contracts -- possible use case? yes or no?
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 11:44:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKaEYh+ud_ey_9jUZ1mq50g==wyCqNRVVLYwZySXpiqTq8x36w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABsx9T29T+thSeF-xVk+prfeO7ZJQbX=n=tAURqEKQsVtcBpQg@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1239 bytes --]

On 29 September 2013 10:32, Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail•com> wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Neil Fincham <neil@asdf•co.nz> wrote:
>
>> I subscribe to this list so I can keep up-to date with bitcoin
>> development, can we keep philosophy and tax evasion out of it?
>>
>
> Yes, that's off-topic for this mailing list. Lets stick to technical
> issues that we can solve by writing code.
>

Hi Gavin, apologies if my post came across as off-topic.  My aim was to
present a use case, and ask whether or not it was technically feasible
using smart contracts.


>
> --
> --
> Gavin Andresen
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> October Webinars: Code for Performance
> Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
> Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most
> from
> the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2504 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-09-29  9:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-27 23:41 Melvin Carvalho
2013-09-28 20:15 ` rob.golding
2013-09-29  2:28   ` Neil Fincham
2013-09-29  8:32     ` Gavin Andresen
2013-09-29  9:37       ` Adam Back
2013-09-29 17:49         ` Mark Friedenbach
2013-10-01 14:26           ` [Bitcoin-development] homomorphic coin value (validatable but encrypted) (Re: smart contracts -- possible use case? yes or no?) Adam Back
2013-10-01 19:11             ` Adam Back
2013-10-07 19:01               ` Adam Back
2013-09-29  9:44       ` Melvin Carvalho [this message]
2013-09-29  9:46     ` [Bitcoin-development] smart contracts -- possible use case? yes or no? Melvin Carvalho
2013-09-29 11:33       ` Mike Hearn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAKaEYh+ud_ey_9jUZ1mq50g==wyCqNRVVLYwZySXpiqTq8x36w@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=melvincarvalho@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=bitcoin-development@lists$(echo .)sourceforge.net \
    --cc=gavinandresen@gmail$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox