Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ordinal Inscription Size Limits

From: Melvin Carvalho <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 20:56:16 +0100

pá 27. 1. 2023 v 13:47 odesílatel Robert Dickinson via bitcoin-dev <
[email-masked]> napsal:

> I'm curious what opinions exist and what actions might be taken by core
> developers regarding storing unlimited amounts of NFT (or other?) content
> as witness data (https://docs.ordinals.com/inscriptions.html). The
> ordinal scheme is elegant and genius IMHO, but when I think about the
> future disk use of all unpruned nodes, I question whether unlimited storage
> is wise to allow for such use cases. Wouldn't it be better to find a way to
> impose a size limit similar to OP_RETURN for such inscriptions?
>
> I think it would be useful to link a sat to a deed or other legal
> construct for proof of ownership in the real world, so that real property
> can be transferred on the blockchain using ordinals, but storing the
> property itself on the blockchain seems nonsensical to me.
>

Low tech solution: miners charge a premium for storing images in the block
chain.  Say 2x, 5x, 10x.

This encourages bitcoin to be used as a financial network, while increasing
the security budget.

>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>