From: Gary Rowe <g.rowe@froot•co.uk>
To: "bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net"
<bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] new bitcoin.org clients page
Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 20:46:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKm8k+12tXVHMcS5-nF4G5F2wUWcBjTFbJ66aL8gaAO4PXVBOQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1335987832.23789.YahooMailNeo@web121007.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6500 bytes --]
Alan, apologies about the installer - I was just using your website info to
infer how it all fitted together.
On 2 May 2012 20:43, Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo•com> wrote:
> This discussion about ordering is absolutely retarded. Once the list fills
> up, then it won't matter. For now I'm deciding the ordering with Bitcoin-Qt
> first and the others ordered however. That was nobody can try to game the
> system (it remains unexploitable).
>
> If there are no objections, then I am going to merge this branch. The
> forum thread is divulging into a mess all over the place, and this
> conversation can go on forever discussing the silly fine details:
>
> http://hackerspaces.org/wiki/The_Bikeshed_Anti-PatternProblem:
> You suggest creating something new for your hackerspace, like a
> bikeshed. But now all anyone will discuss is its colour. No bikeshed
> will be built.
>
> Armory & MultiBit, are you OK with that description? I will check with
> ThomasV about Electrum.
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Gary Rowe <g.rowe@froot•co.uk>
> To: "bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net" <
> bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 8:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] new bitcoin.org clients page
>
>
> How about keeping it simple?
>
> Bitcoin-Qt
> * Requires the entire blockchain
> * Standalone client
> * Designed for continuous operation
> * Available for Windows, Mac, Linux with installer
> * Developed in C
> * Website: https://bitcoin.org
>
> MultiBit
> * Requires a reduced blockchain
> * Standalone client
> * Designed for occasional use
> * Available for Windows, Mac, Linux with installer
> * Developed in Java
> * Website: http://multibit.org
>
> Armory
> * Requires the entire blockchain
> * Dependent client of Bitcoin-Qt
> * Designed for occasional use
> * Available for Windows (64-bit only), Mac, Linux (self-build)
> * Developed in Python
> * Website: http://bitcoinarmory.com/
>
> Electrum
> * Requires no blockchain
> * Dependent client of Bitcoin-Qt (on server)
> * Designed for occasional use
> * Available for Windows, Linux (self-build)
> * Developed in Python
> * Website: http://ecdsa.org/electrum/
>
> Bitcoin Wallet (Android client)
> * Requires a reduced blockchain
> * Standalone client
> * Designed for occasional use on mobile
> * Available for Android only
> * Developed in Java
> * Website:
> https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.schildbach.wallet&hl=en
>
>
> On 2 May 2012 20:25, Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo•com> wrote:
>
> This is like the most annoying thing about email. Often with group emails,
> we'll be having a conversation then someone will click reply instead of
> group reply and the convo will go on for a while. Eventually I'll realise
> the persons are missing and add them back in.
> >
> >On Yahoo mail (which I use for spam/mailing lists), to do reply all
> involves clicking a tab, scrolling down and clicking Reply All. Normally I
> instead go through the steps of reply, delete To, re-enter bitco... select
> drop down, click send.
> >
> >Anyone know how to make reply all the default in mutt? And how can I
> exclude it from re-including my own email when I do a group reply so I
> don't get the same email again.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@exmulti•com>
> >To: grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail•com>
> >Cc: bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net
> >Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 7:29 PM
> >Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] new bitcoin.org clients page
> >
> >
> >On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:58 PM, grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail•com> wrote:
> >>> Try "Reply to All"
> >>
> >> That puts the sender in 'to' and list in 'cc',
> >> which dupes to the sender and eventually
> >> blows out the to and cc lines as everyone
> >> chimes in and doesn't trim. 'reply to' solves
> >> most of that. assuming the list sw can do it.
> >
> >"Reply-To" Munging Considered Harmful
> >http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >Jeff Garzik
> >exMULTI, Inc.
> >jgarzik@exmulti•com
> >
>
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >Live Security Virtual Conference
> >Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> >threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> >will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> >threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> >_______________________________________________
> >Bitcoin-development mailing list
> >Bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net
> >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
> >
> >
>
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >Live Security Virtual Conference
> >Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> >threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> >will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> >threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> >_______________________________________________
> >Bitcoin-development mailing list
> >Bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net
> >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 9563 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-02 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-30 17:50 Amir Taaki
2012-04-30 18:23 ` Alan Reiner
2012-04-30 18:31 ` Amir Taaki
2012-04-30 19:51 ` Alan Reiner
2012-05-02 13:22 ` Mike Hearn
2012-05-02 13:30 ` Gregory Maxwell
2012-05-02 13:32 ` Mike Hearn
2012-05-02 13:31 ` Luke-Jr
2012-05-02 16:21 ` grarpamp
2012-05-02 16:30 ` Luke-Jr
2012-05-02 16:58 ` grarpamp
2012-05-02 18:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2012-05-02 19:25 ` Amir Taaki
2012-05-02 19:34 ` Gary Rowe
2012-05-02 19:40 ` Raphael NICOLLE
2012-05-02 19:42 ` Gary Rowe
2012-05-02 19:43 ` Alan Reiner
2012-05-02 19:43 ` Amir Taaki
2012-05-02 19:46 ` Gary Rowe [this message]
2012-05-02 19:56 ` Alan Reiner
2012-05-02 20:25 ` Luke-Jr
2012-05-02 20:39 ` Gary Rowe
2012-05-02 19:35 ` Alan Reiner
2012-05-03 9:06 ` grarpamp
2012-05-02 13:38 ` Gregory Maxwell
2012-05-02 13:42 ` Mike Hearn
2012-05-02 15:01 ` Alan Reiner
2012-05-02 16:53 ` grarpamp
2012-05-03 7:28 ` Andreas Schildbach
2012-05-03 9:24 ` Jorge Timón
2012-05-03 9:53 ` Andreas Schildbach
2012-05-03 10:25 ` Jorge Timón
2012-05-02 23:04 ` Jeff Garzik
2012-05-02 20:41 Jim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKm8k+12tXVHMcS5-nF4G5F2wUWcBjTFbJ66aL8gaAO4PXVBOQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=g.rowe@froot$(echo .)co.uk \
--cc=bitcoin-development@lists$(echo .)sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox