I like "reusable address". It is very clear what the intended purpose is and gives a subtle hint that other types of address should not be re-used. On 16 January 2014 00:44, Eric Martindale wrote: > One variation of this, "recycled address", might avert misconceptions that > the "re-use" is exclusive to one's own identity. > > > Eric Martindale, relentless maker. > http://www.ericmartindale.com > +1 (919) 374-2020 | *BitMessage: *BM-2cWCmYBpV64FRSJpHHKWi1Cfc9W52jydwe > *Note:* Beginning December 11th, 2013, I will only be intermittently > available via email, SMS, and BitMessage. As a courtesy, please leave a > detailed message so that I can respond in kind. Thanks! > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Jeremy Spilman wrote: > >> Might I propose "reusable address". >> >> I think that describes it best to any non-programmer, and even more so >> encourages wallets to present options as 'one time use' vs 'reusable'. >> >> It definitely packs a marketing punch which could help drive adoption. >> The feature is only useful if/when broadly adopted. >> >> I think it meets all the criteria required: >> >> - Communication between parties is a single message from the payee, >> which may be public >> - Multiple payments to the same address are not publicly linkable on >> the blockchain >> - The payee has explicitly designated they expect to receive more than >> one payment at that address >> - Payer can publicly prove they made a payment to the reusable address >> by revealing a secret >> >> I have high hopes for this feature. The war *against* address reuse may >> soon be a distant memory. >> >> On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:44:17 -0800, Jeff Garzik >> wrote: >> >> "static address" seems like a reasonable attempt at describing intended >> use/direction. >> >> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Ben Davenport >>> wrote: >>> > But may I suggest we consider changing the name "stealth address" to >>> > something more neutral? >>> >>> ACK. Regardless of the 'political' overtones, I think stealth is a >>> little cringe-worthy. >>> >>> "Private address" would be fine if not for confusion with private-keys. >>> >>> "Static address" is perhaps the best in my view. (also helps improve >>> awareness that normal addresses are intended to be more one-use-ness) >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. >> Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For >> Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. >> Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. >> >> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >> _______________________________________________ >> Bitcoin-development mailing list >> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. > Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For > Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. > Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > >