public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergio Demian Lerner <sergio.d.lerner@gmail•com>
To: Matt Corallo <lf-lists@mattcorallo•com>
Cc: bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Some real-world results about the current Segwit Discount
Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 16:40:12 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKzdR-p-8=OA6_-vSyrNr3Ofqq5yL20WQCVkzMnrhwVM_AWEaw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B067643A-FBFD-4F59-B7AE-77769B9A9ACE@mattcorallo.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2132 bytes --]

I'm not advocating. I'm mediating.


This is out of

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Matt Corallo <lf-lists@mattcorallo•com>
wrote:

> I highly disagree about the "not shit" part.  You're advocating for
> throwing away one of the key features of Segwit, something that is very
> important for Bitcoin's long-term reliability! If you think doing so is
> going to somehow help get support in a divided community, I don't
> understand how - more likely you're only going to make things significantly
> worse.
>
> On May 10, 2017 11:25:27 AM EDT, Sergio Demian Lerner <
> sergio.d.lerner@gmail•com> wrote:
> >Jaja. But no shit. Not perfect maybe, but Bitcoin was never perfect. It
> >has
> >always been good enough. And at the beginning it was quite simple.
> >Simple
> >enough it allowed gradual improvements that anyone with some technical
> >background could understand. Now we need a full website to explain an
> >improvement.
> >But this is becoming more and more out of topic.
> >
> >
> >On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Matt Corallo
> ><lf-lists@mattcorallo•com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> I'm highly unconvinced of this point. Sure, you can change fewer
> >lines
> >> of code, but if the result is, lets be honest, shit, how do you
> >believe
> >> its going to have a higher chance of getting acceptance from the
> >broader
> >> community? I think you're over-optimizing in the wrong direction.
> >>
> >> Matt
> >>
> >> On 05/09/17 20:58, Sergio Demian Lerner wrote:
> >> > I agree with you Matt.
> >> > I'm artificially limiting myself to changing the parameters of
> >Segwit as
> >> > it is..
> >> >
> >> > This is motivated by the idea that a consensual HF in the current
> >state
> >> > would have greater chance of acceptance if it changes the minimum
> >number
> >> > of lines of code.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Gregory Maxwell <greg@xiph•org
> >> > <mailto:greg@xiph•org>> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >     On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Matt Corallo
> >> >     <lf-lists@mattcorallo•com <mailto:lf-lists@mattcorallo•com>>
> >wrote:
> >> >     > at beast.
> >> >
> >> >     Rawr.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3332 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-10 19:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-08 22:42 Sergio Demian Lerner
2017-05-08 23:47 ` Alphonse Pace
2017-05-09 13:49   ` Sergio Demian Lerner
2017-05-09 14:33     ` James Hilliard
2017-05-09 15:45     ` Johnson Lau
2017-05-09 16:19       ` Sergio Demian Lerner
2017-05-09 16:27         ` Johnson Lau
2017-05-09 16:27         ` James Hilliard
2017-05-09 18:15     ` Matt Corallo
2017-05-09 18:58       ` Sergio Demian Lerner
2017-05-09 19:15         ` Sergio Demian Lerner
2017-05-09 19:30           ` Gregory Maxwell
2017-05-09 19:42             ` Matt Corallo
2017-05-09 20:13               ` Gregory Maxwell
2017-05-09 20:58                 ` Sergio Demian Lerner
2017-05-10  5:37                   ` Jorge Timón
2017-05-10 14:05                   ` Matt Corallo
2017-05-10 15:25                     ` Sergio Demian Lerner
2017-05-10 16:39                       ` Matt Corallo
2017-05-10 19:40                         ` Sergio Demian Lerner [this message]
2017-05-08 23:56 ` Gregory Maxwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAKzdR-p-8=OA6_-vSyrNr3Ofqq5yL20WQCVkzMnrhwVM_AWEaw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=sergio.d.lerner@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=bitcoin-dev@lists$(echo .)linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=lf-lists@mattcorallo$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox