Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Number Request: Addresses over Audio

From: Daniel Hoffman <danielhoffman699@gmail•com>
To: Thomas Daede <bztdlinux@gmail•com>,
	 Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
	<bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Number Request: Addresses over Audio
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 20:53:06 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL9WuQX=nPkmt6S5KJn=8UdmAnxU206hG3cL_qqXdmzvQ83CuQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aa41549b-b392-a225-26e1-2dcf4edfeb21@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7275 bytes --]

Thomas
In all honesty, I shouldn't have added the multiple feature. It should
always stay to one and have the Bitcoin address's built in checksum do all
of the heavy lifting (or implement another checksum into the protocol).
Having said that, it would make the most sense to not include BIP21
requests. The frequencies that are going to be used are prone to being
changed (probably moving them into the ultrasound range, at least for the
16 tones)

Luke Dashjr
I thought it was only 12, will change it accordingly.

Chris
I looked at Audio Modem and will probably look at the others soon as well.

The general idea of this BIP is to see if you all even approve of the idea
of sending Bitcoin addresses over sound waves. I will push it into the
ultrasound, and I might implement phase modulation.

On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Thomas Daede via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> If this is just encoding BIP-21 addresses, it is basically an "audio QR
> code". In this case, does publishing it as a BIP still make sense? (Not
> to imply that it doesn't, but it's something you should consider.)
>
> Please look at existing implementations of audio modems when creating
> your design. A lot of this work has been done many times before, so
> there is a lot to learn from.
>
> Your selected frequencies are harmonics of each other, meaning nonlinear
> distortion will make detection more difficult. The Bell 202 and similar
> modem standards chose AFSK frequencies to minimize interference.
>
> Repeating a message multiple times is a very inefficient method of error
> recovery. It works, but there may be better techniques, such as trellis
> modulation or other convolutional codes.
>
> Defining channel models to simulate your various use cases will help a
> lot to determine if you have met your requirements.
>
> - Thomas
>
> P.S. I also briefly considered audio to exchange transactions with a
> hardware wallet. Using GNU Radio made the implementation much easier.
>
> On 08/09/2016 04:06 PM, Daniel Hoffman via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > I have updated the GitHub a lot (changed tones to be less chirpy, fixed
> > some smalls) and made a couple of samples (see attachment for MP3 and
> > FLAC of both tone tables, first 16 then 4). Is this good enough to
> > warrant an official BIP number? I haven't built a decoder yet, but it
> > seems like the encoder is working properly (looked at Audacity, seems
> > like it is working), and some people on reddit want to "allow for
> > decoding experiments"
> > <https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/4wsn7v/bip_proposal_
> addresses_over_audio_thoughts/d69m3st>
> >
> > What suggestions do you all have for it?
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Daniel Hoffman
> > <danielhoffman699@gmail•com <mailto:danielhoffman699@gmail•com>> wrote:
> >
> >     It wouldn't be feasible in the vast majority of cases, but I can't
> >     think of a reason why it can't be built into the standard.
> >
> >     On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Trevin Hofmann via bitcoin-dev
> >     <bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org
> >     <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org>> wrote:
> >
> >         Would it be feasible to transmit an entire BIP21 URI as audio?
> >         If you were to encode any extra information (such as amount), it
> >         would be useful to include a checksum for the entire message.
> >         This checksum could possibly be used instead of the checksum in
> >         the address.
> >
> >         Trevin
> >
> >
> >         On Aug 8, 2016 3:06 PM, "Justin Newton via bitcoin-dev"
> >         <bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org
> >         <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org>> wrote:
> >
> >             Daniel,
> >                Thanks for proposing this.  I think this could have some
> >             useful use cases as you state.  I was wondering what you
> >             would think to adding some additional tones to optionally
> >             denote an amount (in satoshis?).
> >
> >             (FYI, actual link is here:  https://github.com/Dako300/BIP
> >             <https://github.com/Dako300/BIP> )
> >
> >             Justin
> >
> >             On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Daniel Hoffman via
> >             bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org
> >             <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org>> wrote:
> >
> >                 This is my BIP idea: a fast, robust, and standardized
> >                 for representing Bitcoin addresses over audio. It takes
> >                 the binary representation of the Bitcoin address (little
> >                 endian), chops that up into 4 or 2 bit chunks (depending
> >                 on type, 2 bit only for low quality audio like american
> >                 telephone lines), and generates a tone based upon that
> >                 value. This started because I wanted an easy way to
> >                 donate to podcasts that I listen to, and having a
> >                 Shazam-esque app (or a media player with this
> >                 capability) that gives me an address automatically would
> >                 be wonderful for both the consumer and producer. Comes
> >                 with error correction built into the protocol
> >
> >                 You can see the full specification of the BIP on my
> >                 GitHub page (https://github.com/Dako300/BIP-0153
> >                 <https://github.com/Dako300/BIP-0153>).
> >
> >                 _______________________________________________
> >                 bitcoin-dev mailing list
> >                 bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org
> >                 <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org>
> >                 https://lists.linuxfoundation.
> org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
> >                 <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/
> listinfo/bitcoin-dev>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >             --
> >
> >             Justin W. Newton
> >             Founder/CEO
> >             Netki, Inc.
> >
> >             justin@netki•com <mailto:justin@netki•com>
> >             +1.818.261.4248 <tel:+1.818.261.4248>
> >
> >
> >
> >             _______________________________________________
> >             bitcoin-dev mailing list
> >             bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org
> >             <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org>
> >             https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-
> dev
> >             <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/
> listinfo/bitcoin-dev>
> >
> >
> >         _______________________________________________
> >         bitcoin-dev mailing list
> >         bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org
> >         <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org>
> >         https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
> >         <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > bitcoin-dev mailing list
> > bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org
> > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 12019 bytes --]