public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keagan McClelland <keagan.mcclelland@gmail•com>
To: Richard Greaser <thebitcoinbugle@gmail•com>
Cc: Bitcoin Development Mailing List <bitcoindev@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [bitcoindev] HODL Tax Proposal
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 17:12:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALeFGL0jBUhwmgE3CJ1Sv_UfQHeGq6madh1HQo2DKUek+pUpnw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6512db18-bd15-462e-92fd-7549b5e885e7n@googlegroups.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3203 bytes --]

This is never going to happen.

While demurrage has been proposed before and may ultimately be a
consideration that the Bitcoin users want to ensure that costs are borne
fairly by the different use cases, this mechanism is somewhat laughable.

The proposal you present also seems to reflect a deep misunderstanding of
how the Bitcoin protocol works:
1. Self assigning a bip number defies the bip assignment process and claims
a level of legitimacy that this proposal does not have.
2. Bitcoin for the most part does not really understand "days". There is a
timestamping mechanism that is used to reconcile difficulty adjustment
periods with the targeted time, but this is not something that can be more
widely used.
3. The way that "balances" are tracked and audited by Bitcoin nodes does
not lend itself easily to being just "deducted from"
4. You cannot "automatically deduct" a fee from an "address". Addresses
don't technically exist at the protocol level.
5. Miners do not "contribute proportionally" to computational work of
finding a block. There's the winner, and then everyone else.
6. Bitcoin cannot and will not make any legal or jurisdictional
considerations whatsoever when considering design choices.
7. Dennis Porter is irrelevant and does not have any authority to grant or
withhold "permission"
8. This proposal, like all demurrage proposals, clearly has negative
tradeoffs to be considered.
9. Centrally planning the price and inactivity period of demurrage is
antithetical to Bitcoin's decentralized market design mechanisms in use
thus far.

Stick to journalism. Maybe learn about Bitcoin a bit before trying to
extract the wealth of savers.

Keags

On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 2:13 PM Richard Greaser <thebitcoinbugle@gmail•com>
wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> It has become apparent to me that there is an issue where users of the
> network holding their coins, are not adding value to the network.
>
> As miners continue to get squeezed post halving, they would benefit
> tremendously from fees being taken from individuals refusing to move their
> coins, providing increased security to the network.
>
> I have written out a proposal more in depth and is attached below.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups•com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/6512db18-bd15-462e-92fd-7549b5e885e7n%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/6512db18-bd15-462e-92fd-7549b5e885e7n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups•com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/CALeFGL0jBUhwmgE3CJ1Sv_UfQHeGq6madh1HQo2DKUek%2BpUpnw%40mail.gmail.com.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4138 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-08-02  0:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-01 21:03 Richard Greaser
2024-08-01 21:59 ` José Edil Guimarães de Medeiros
2024-08-02  0:28   ` Keagan McClelland
2024-08-02  1:19     ` Jimmy Song
2024-08-02  2:03       ` George Burke
2024-08-02  5:08       ` 'hashnoncemessage' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2024-08-01 23:38 ` George Burke
2024-08-02  0:12 ` Keagan McClelland [this message]
2024-08-02  8:45 ` [bitcoindev] " Garlo Nicon
2024-08-01 21:55 [bitcoindev] " Christian Riley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALeFGL0jBUhwmgE3CJ1Sv_UfQHeGq6madh1HQo2DKUek+pUpnw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=keagan.mcclelland@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=bitcoindev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=thebitcoinbugle@gmail$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox