Actually I was looking at a screenshot someone sent me because I couldn't seem to access it even after changing the hosts file (I assumed it was recent, but I guess not). It just looked like the regular Bitcoin page (despite doing a ping on the command line and seeing the expected IP). Was there a specific link to click on? Am I blind? Is there a process we should use to submit how we think our program should be represented on the clients page? -Alan On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Amir Taaki wrote: > Are we looking at the same list? Because here is the order I added: > Bitcoin-Qt, Armory, Electrum and MultiBit. Maybe try CTRL-F5 to force a > refresh of your browser. > > Also about the descriptions: yeah I know. I think it's better to put this > up first and then have everyone submit their own descriptions and > screenshots. Otherwise it'll be a nightmare to coordinate until everything > is perfect. I did message you on IRC today but maybe you were offline. > > I didn't copy paste the Armory description from the website because it > really sounds too spammy like a sales pitch. Here I was trying to give an > even handed balanced overview of all the clients. For each client I was > trying to empaphise a 'theme'. Bitcoin-Qt is stability. Armory is advanced. > Electrum is convenient. MultiBit is ease of use. > > ________________________________ > From: Alan Reiner > To: Amir Taaki > Cc: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" < > bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> > Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 7:23 PM > Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] new bitcoin.org clients page > > > Hey, looks good! I'm glad to see them sorted alphabetically :) > > A couple comments: I don't think the entries for "wallet security" and > "backups" accurately describe Armory. Wallet Security should say > "Encrypt/Offline" or something to to that effect -- after all, offline > wallets are the holy grail feature of the Armory. And backups should say > something like "One-time Printable" if it fits within the box. > > Otherwise, I really like the layout and design. Although despite the fact > I enjoy being first on the list, I think Bitcoin-Qt should still go first. > It is the "reference" client, and I think it's relevant that it is the > "de-facto" client for the majority of users, and the one with the most > quality control and stability. > > -Alan > > > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Amir Taaki wrote: > > Check it :) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.org/pull/34 > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >Live Security Virtual Conference > >Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > >threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > >will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > >threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > >_______________________________________________ > >Bitcoin-development mailing list > >Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development >