Hi Weikeng, I agree that it has a lot of support among bitcoin developers. No objections for CSFS on [wiki][0]with evaluations from more than 50 bitcoin developers. Co-author of APO, Christian Decker has also expressed his support for it on [twitter][1]. Even Greg Maxwell considers it [useful][2]. [0]: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Covenants_support [1]: https://x.com/Snyke/status/1895880013796556818 [2]: https://freenode.irclog.whitequark.org/bitcoin-wizards/2019-11-28 /dev/fd0 floppy disk guy On Mon, Mar 17, 2025, 7:03 PM Weikeng Chen wrote: > I am writing just to solicit people's opinions on whether CSFS should be > added to signet given that CTV + CSFS combination has recently received a > lot of support. Although CTV has already been on signet for a few years, > CSFS isn't. > > With CTV and CSFS being on the signet also allows part of the LNHANCE to > start experimenting, and it has been discussed that CSFS helps with BitVM > by replacing Winternitz signatures completely with a much lower potential > on-chain data availability overhead. This also allows applications relying > on CTV + CSFS to develop further. > > Thanks, > Weikeng > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/2584bf15-8e7f-4d89-8987-f41dd06b2824n%40googlegroups.com > > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/CALiT-Zo3JcUjyQ3%3D--oecm6Nq2CM20AzZbpLQsZhSXKJfxm7rQ%40mail.gmail.com.