I'd be happy with a sort of BitTorrent like snubbing, and dropping in extreme cases.
Sharing blacklist decisions would be dangerous. We could even extend the protocol to include some sort of choking/unchoking in order to warn peers that we might drop him if he continues to misbehave.

In general I think that we have to be careful in what we consider misbehaving, it should be really conservative to begin with, and extend the rules over time. Making them too restrictive might make future development difficult, not to speak of alternative clients.

Regards,
Chris

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:
On Wednesday, September 14, 2011 9:57:00 PM Gavin Andresen wrote:
> I'm looking for review of this pull request:
>   https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/517

"Non-standard" transactions, or those with "insufficient" fees should not be
penalised. These are properly relay/miner policy decisions, not protocol
violations, and should be made more easily configurable, not punished for
configuration.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop
What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses
from deploying virtual desktops?   How do next-generation virtual desktops
provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable
virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development