From: Pindar Wong <pindar.wong@gmail•com>
To: gabe appleton <gappleto97@gmail•com>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Meta suggestions for this block size debate
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2015 14:34:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM7BtUqN6rYrCrH6Ni5N+ENAwZ85YO53W0oEEkoqkBgsRPpinA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANJO25L-r+3_kR8FD1EZ0F1_Cz9fUO5c8Fz=DW-yKZuONa4qkw@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3440 bytes --]
Thanks Gabe.
https://github.com/gappleto97/BlockSizeDebate
github's reachable via vpn.
p.
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 2:28 PM, gabe appleton <gappleto97@gmail•com> wrote:
> Yeah. We made a git repo instead, so we don't have to bother with the
> exclusive-by-default wiki policies. It's linked in this email chain.
>
> I'll be getting home tomorrow, so I should be able to start back up on
> this. A few days from now we should throw this on /r/Bitcoin so we can get
> some more public comment on it. They already gave me a few leads to chase.
> On Jun 5, 2015 11:34 PM, "Pindar Wong" <pindar.wong@gmail•com> wrote:
>
>> Gabe,
>>
>> Did you ever get an answer to this?
>>
>> I"ll have some time tomorrow to be able to help with some work on this
>> and will need to do it myself anyways since I'm not sure I understand the
>> nuances, where bitcoin XT fits into the scheme of things (or not) etc.
>>
>> I would have thought that there would be a testnet4 by now using 8mb
>> blocks... but hey that's just me.
>>
>> p.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:52 AM, gabe appleton <gappleto97@gmail•com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I don't have permission to create a page. If someone else does, I'll
>>> happily get a framework started.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Ethan Heilman <eth3rs@gmail•com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I second this, I don't have time to read the large number of emails
>>>> generated every day from the block size debate. A summary of the various
>>>> positions and arguments would be extremely helpful.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:02 PM, gabe appleton <gappleto97@gmail•com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Also, can we try to get a wiki page for the debate? That way we could
>>>>> condense the information as much as possible. I'll be willing to assist if
>>>>> the page gets approval.
>>>>> On Jun 1, 2015 6:41 PM, "Mats Henricson" <mats@henricson•se> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My fingers have been itching many times now, this debate
>>>>>> drives me nuts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I just wish all posters could follow two simple principles:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. Read up. Yes. All of what has been written. Yes, it will
>>>>>> take many hours. But if you're rehashing what other
>>>>>> smarter people have said over and over before, you're
>>>>>> wasting hundreds of peoples time. Please don't.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2. Be helpful. Suggest alternatives. Just cristizising is
>>>>>> just destructive. If you want no change, then say so.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mats
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Bitcoin-development mailing list
>>>>>> Bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net
>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Bitcoin-development mailing list
>>>>> Bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Bitcoin-development mailing list
>>> Bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>>>
>>>
>>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5830 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-06 6:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-01 22:22 Mats Henricson
2015-06-02 3:02 ` gabe appleton
2015-06-02 3:32 ` Ethan Heilman
2015-06-02 3:52 ` gabe appleton
2015-06-06 3:34 ` Pindar Wong
2015-06-06 6:28 ` gabe appleton
2015-06-06 6:34 ` Pindar Wong [this message]
2015-06-06 6:37 ` gabe appleton
2015-06-06 6:39 ` Pindar Wong
2015-06-06 6:41 ` gabe appleton
2015-06-08 0:55 ` gabe appleton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAM7BtUqN6rYrCrH6Ni5N+ENAwZ85YO53W0oEEkoqkBgsRPpinA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=pindar.wong@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=bitcoin-development@lists$(echo .)sourceforge.net \
--cc=gappleto97@gmail$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox