Thanks Chris. Yep, looks like an honest-ish user managed to accidentally get one tx into one chain and another into the other. I think I'd cautiously say that if OKPay gets their cash back, or freezes his balance nobody is out BTC for last night, (instead just time and effort). I'm doing a little FUD-fighting right now, but will try and pick up a bit more if necessary tonight after my flight lands. I think this is mostly over the heads of a lot of our typical media contacts, though. Peter On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Christian Decker < decker.christian@gmail.com> wrote: > Just a quick and dirty check if something bad actually happened. 430 > transactions that were confirmed in the alt-chain, are not confirmed > in the true blockchain. The good news is that as far as I can tell > most of them are low volume transactions destined for SD. > > 7 transactions were true double spends, or to be more precise > transactions in which an conflicting transaction was confirmed in the > new chain (with their respective amount): > > 12814b8ad57ce5654ba69eb26a52ddae1bff42093ca20cef3ad96fe7fd85d195 261 BTC > cb36ba33b3ecd4d3177d786209670c9e6cdf95eb62be54986f0b49ca292714af 0.06 BTC > 7192807f952b252081d0db0aa7575c4695b945820adaf7776b7189e6b3d86f96 0.01 BTC > 355d4ea51c3b780cf0b10e8099a06a31484e0060bc140b63f3d6e5fb713ace5e 0.05 BTC > b961bc0c663a46893afd3166a604e7e2639533522d9fec61fdb95eb665e86f5a 0.61 BTC > 138063e4bdb76feaa511f1e7f9c681eb468ef9140c141671741c965e503b84c6 1.62 BTC > a10bd194cdbf9aa4c12eb0b120056998a081a9b0d93d70570edff24dec831f90 0.81 > > So the one transaction that really hurt was the one published on > BitcoinTalk. We're not yet out of the woods as some of the 423 > transactions still have a chance of being doublespent, but looks like > it's not that bad after all. > > Cheers, > Chris > > P.S.: For a complete list of transactions see http://pastebin.com/wctJU3Ln > -- > Christian Decker > > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Gregory Maxwell > wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Gregory Maxwell > wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Peter Vessenes > wrote: > >>> Can some enterprising soul determine if there were any double-spend > attempts? > >>> I'm assuming no, and if that's the case, we should talk about that > publicly. > > [snip] > >> I agree it would be good to confirm no one was ripped off, even though > >> we can't say there weren't any attempts. > > > > https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=152348.msg1616747#msg1616747 > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar > > _______________________________________________ > > Bitcoin-development mailing list > > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > -- ------------------------------ [image: CoinLab Logo]PETER VESSENES CEO *peter@coinlab.com * / 206.486.6856 / SKYPE: vessenes 811 FIRST AVENUE / SUITE 480 / SEATTLE, WA 98104