From: "Russell O'Connor" <roconnor@blockstream•io>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp•com.au>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
<bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Making OP_TRUE standard?
Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 10:20:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMZUoK=ihVJ_x4LY0N6xVgoqqnvLOurtAQHuW1H2Jd_Z1vo61g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zi0tisft.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1626 bytes --]
In the thread "Revisting BIP 125 RBF policy" @
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2018-February/015717.html
and
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2018-March/015797.html
I propose replacing rule 3 with a rule that instead demands that the
replacement package fee rate exceeds the package fee rate of the original
transactions, and that there is an absolute fee bump of the particular
transaction being replaced that covers the min-fee rate times the size of
the mempool churn's data size.
Perhaps this would address your issue too Rusty.
On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 11:44 PM, Rusty Russell via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Jim Posen <jim.posen@gmail•com> writes:
> > I believe OP_CSV with a relative locktime of 0 could be used to enforce
> RBF
> > on the spending tx?
>
> Marco points out that if the parent is RBF, this child inherits it, so
> we're actually good here.
>
> However, Matt Corallo points out that you can block RBF will a
> large-but-lowball tx, as BIP 125 points out:
>
> will be replaced by a new transaction...:
>
> 3. The replacement transaction pays an absolute fee of at least the sum
> paid by the original transactions.
>
> I understand implementing a single mempool requires these kind of
> up-front decisions on which tx is "better", but I wonder about the
> consequences of dropping this heuristic? Peter?
>
> Thanks!
> Rusty.
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2723 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-21 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-08 23:57 Rusty Russell
2018-05-09 0:24 ` Olaoluwa Osuntokun
2018-05-09 3:02 ` ZmnSCPxj
2018-05-10 2:08 ` Rusty Russell
2018-05-09 17:56 ` Johnson Lau
2018-05-09 19:27 ` Peter Todd
2018-05-09 20:19 ` Johnson Lau
2018-05-09 20:59 ` Peter Todd
2018-05-09 22:06 ` Olaoluwa Osuntokun
2018-05-10 2:06 ` Rusty Russell
2018-05-10 2:27 ` Luke Dashjr
2018-05-10 3:07 ` ZmnSCPxj
2018-05-15 1:22 ` ZmnSCPxj
2018-05-17 2:44 ` Rusty Russell
2018-05-17 10:28 ` ZmnSCPxj
2018-05-17 17:35 ` Christian Decker
2018-05-17 20:06 ` Jim Posen
2018-05-21 3:44 ` Rusty Russell
2018-05-21 3:56 ` Peter Todd
2018-05-30 2:47 ` Rusty Russell
2018-05-31 2:47 ` Rusty Russell
2018-05-21 14:20 ` Russell O'Connor [this message]
2018-05-10 9:33 ` Jorge Timón
2018-05-10 9:33 ` Jorge Timón
2018-05-10 9:43 ` Luke Dashjr
2018-05-11 2:44 ` ZmnSCPxj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAMZUoK=ihVJ_x4LY0N6xVgoqqnvLOurtAQHuW1H2Jd_Z1vo61g@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=roconnor@blockstream$(echo .)io \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists$(echo .)linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp$(echo .)com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox