public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Drak <drak@zikula•org>
To: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail•com>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net>,
	kjj <bitcoin-devel@jerviss•org>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Multisign payment protocol?
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 11:43:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANAnSg2kzPF0886PsQW8chzsWi6Urp+=-x+9bbv8Mv6hmpvBPw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABsx9T3eViYDsEmLm7ceimJNwci3mCOxWoVnVZHrqp7pDmm0+g@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3808 bytes --]

Gavin,

You have pretty much nailed my intent in both respects. This sets up a way
to negotiate the address and abstract away the nasty details of finding
public keys from bitcoin addresses, and provides a nice clean way for
redemption abstracting away the long strings of hex.

For redemption, I think as each party signs the tx if the script returns
true, it would be acceptable to just go right ahead and broadcast it, or
maybe as you suggest all signatures go back to the initiating party and
they do the final work.

I very much like the idea of assuming each party uses HD wallets, that
certainly simplifies things greatly. I also like the use of email addresses
as a negotiation medium, but I also wonder if this could be made agnostic
in any BIP proposal so it could work with other communication mediums like
bitmessage for example (just forward thinking anonymity a little).

I definitely think there is a need for a protocol because multisig,
regardless of the application has two technically involved steps:
negotiation of an address, and redemption of any subsequently encumbered
funds. A protocol would enable different wallet implementations to
participate in such a transaction and make wide-spread use much more likely
and possible.

Drak


On 11 March 2014 01:15, Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail•com> wrote:

> Multisig is orthogonal to the payment protocol (but payment protocol is
> needed first).
>
> There need to be protocols for:
>
> a) Establishing multisig wallets of various sorts. See:
>   https://moqups.com/gavinandresen/no8mzUDB/
>   https://moqups.com/gavinandresen/no8mzUDB/p:ab18547e0
> ... etc.  for a UI mock-up.
>   There needs to be some protocol so all participants in a multisig wallet
> contribute keys (actually, we should just assume everybody uses BIP32 HD
> public keys so we get privacy from the start).
>
> Multi-person shared wallets, escrows, and "wallet protection service"
> wallets (which might be protected with two-factor authentication) are
> different use cases and probably use slightly different protocols (and will
> probably need different BIPs eventually).
>
>
> b) Gathering signatures for a multisig spend. Here is where the payment
> protocol is useful; the PaymentRequest message should be passed around so
> all participants know what is being paid for, and maybe a partially-signed
> Payment message is where the signatures are gathered (or maybe the
> signatures are sent separately and one of the participants creates and
> submits the Payment and gets the PaymentACK... "to be designed").
>   See:
>     https://moqups.com/gavinandresen/no8mzUDB/p:a7e81be96
>     https://moqups.com/gavinandresen/no8mzUDB/p:af7339204
> ... for UI mock-up for the multi-person-spend case.
>
> And maybe a protocol for "I don't want to be part of this multisig any
> more / I lost control of my private key don't trust me in this multisig any
> more".
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay•com> wrote:
>
>> All of that only melds with the payment protocol under an extremely
>> expansive definition of "payment."  The payment protocol is really
>> geared towards a direct one-to-one relationship....
>
>
>
>>
>>
> --
> Gavin Andresen
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
> "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their
> applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
> this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5703 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-11 11:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-10 17:39 Drak
2014-03-10 17:49 ` Gavin Andresen
2014-03-10 18:01   ` Alan Reiner
2014-03-11  0:04     ` kjj
2014-03-11  0:09       ` Alan Reiner
2014-03-11  0:14         ` Jeff Garzik
2014-03-11  1:15           ` Gavin Andresen
2014-03-11 11:43             ` Drak [this message]
2014-03-11 12:38               ` Jeff Garzik
2014-03-11 13:51                 ` Gavin Andresen
2014-03-11 14:13                   ` Jeff Garzik
2014-03-11 14:23                     ` Gavin Andresen
2014-03-11 14:34                       ` Jeff Garzik
2014-03-11 14:44                       ` Jeff Garzik
2014-03-11 14:53                         ` Gary Rowe
2014-03-11 15:18                           ` Mike Hearn
2014-03-11 17:11                             ` Miron
2014-03-11 15:37                           ` Thomas Voegtlin
2014-03-11 21:12                     ` Peter Todd
2014-03-11 17:41                   ` Odinn Cyberguerrilla
2014-03-12  0:29                     ` Jean-Pierre Rupp
2014-03-12  2:35                       ` Alan Reiner
2014-03-12  2:48                         ` Eric Lombrozo
2014-03-12  9:48                           ` Mike Hearn
2014-03-12 15:35                             ` Jeff Garzik
2014-03-12 16:02                               ` Mike Hearn
2014-03-12 16:09                                 ` Drak
2014-03-12 16:14                                   ` Mike Hearn
2014-03-12 16:24                                     ` Peter Todd
2014-03-12 16:33                                 ` Jeff Garzik
2014-03-12 16:41                                   ` Mike Hearn
2014-03-12 16:47                                     ` Peter Todd
2014-03-12 16:57                                     ` Jeff Garzik
2014-03-10 17:50 ` Mike Hearn
2014-03-10 18:12 ` Jeff Garzik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CANAnSg2kzPF0886PsQW8chzsWi6Urp+=-x+9bbv8Mv6hmpvBPw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=drak@zikula$(echo .)org \
    --cc=bitcoin-devel@jerviss$(echo .)org \
    --cc=bitcoin-development@lists$(echo .)sourceforge.net \
    --cc=gavinandresen@gmail$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox