public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99•net>
To: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail•com>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] IRC meeting agenda, 18:00 UTC Thursday
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 10:19:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANEZrP0LUv69wYwg_6ivPc=mFiGEYKomaJXmmT2Zm14bKik0bQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPg+sBisYEMWzS5JNXAoB5EeHc=YboOJqsktEqON1dY6Lo2SsA@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1133 bytes --]

I won't be able to make it this time.  My feeling is IRC is a good place to
bounce ideas around when time and people happen to be available, but having
meetings there will inevitably lead to decision making that's better done
in a slower manner via email.

Comments:

   BIP process: are we happy with how it is working? What can we do to improve
it?

Needing some kind of process to allocate a number is over the top. I
skipped this for the bloom filtering BIP. We should take off the part of
the {{BIP}} template that says "don't just pick a number and add a bip" -
that's exactly what people should do. I'm not sure there's any need for an
editing role either.

    Is it time to feature-freeze 0.8

I'd like more time to get the bloom filtering work in. It'll be easier to
promote the 0.8 release if we can sell it as "important
scalability/performance improvement for the network, upgrade to help
Bitcoin keep growing", as whilst there's no real auto update or organized
people who religiously update promotion is very important. I think
ultraprune + bloom filtering is the two major scalability improvements we
have right now.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2031 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-08  9:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-06 18:47 Gavin Andresen
2012-11-06 19:13 ` Luke-Jr
2012-11-06 19:56   ` slush
2012-11-06 22:12     ` Luke-Jr
2012-11-07 19:37 ` Pieter Wuille
2012-11-08  9:19   ` Mike Hearn [this message]
2012-11-08 12:56     ` Pieter Wuille
2012-11-08 13:07     ` Gregory Maxwell
     [not found]     ` <CA+s+GJDVLLv8troMfeyWoOwM3EH4GHYtd=bzUgmg_ZegVT6kXw@mail.gmail.com>
2012-11-08 13:10       ` [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: " Wladimir

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CANEZrP0LUv69wYwg_6ivPc=mFiGEYKomaJXmmT2Zm14bKik0bQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=mike@plan99$(echo .)net \
    --cc=bitcoin-development@lists$(echo .)sourceforge.net \
    --cc=pieter.wuille@gmail$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox