public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99•net>
To: Isidor Zeuner <cryptocurrencies@quidecco•de>
Cc: Bitcoin Development <bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Deanonymisation of clients in Bitcoin P2P network paper
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 14:20:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANEZrP2H8P0nh6224UKbnZ7EXrNE6jwM_SZSj6UaMn1QqWumDg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150122004416.93EFDE27748@quidecco.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 733 bytes --]

>
> I hear that. But I don't see why mainstream wallets and wallets
> designed for crypto research should not share a common core.
>

I think there was some misunderstanding. I was saying they *could and
should* share common cores, so we are in agreement without realising it :)
I also didn't mean to imply there was anything special about bitcoinj, just
that it's an example of a wallet engine that's already in use.


> BIP70 is interesting, indeed, although I still fail to understand why
> (according to the specs I saw) the PaymentRequest message is signed,
> but not the Payment message.
>

Because it's intended to be submitted via HTTPS. But what would you sign
the message with? Some arbitrary key bound to the transaction?

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1161 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-22 13:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-26  7:47 Jean-Paul Kogelman
2014-11-26 13:51 ` Jeff Garzik
2014-11-26 17:13   ` odinn
2014-11-27  2:09   ` Isidor Zeuner
2014-11-27  2:22     ` Gregory Maxwell
2014-11-27 11:06       ` Mike Hearn
2014-11-27 11:27       ` Wladimir
2014-12-08 16:15       ` Isidor Zeuner
2014-12-08 16:59         ` Mike Hearn
2015-01-22  0:44         ` Isidor Zeuner
2015-01-22 13:20           ` Mike Hearn [this message]
2014-12-15 13:25       ` Isidor Zeuner
2014-12-01 10:42     ` Isidor Zeuner
2014-11-27 17:44 Mistr Bigs
2014-11-27 20:30 ` Gregory Maxwell
2014-11-28  0:45 Mistr Bigs
2014-11-28  5:30 ` Gregory Maxwell
2014-12-11 11:51 ` Isidor Zeuner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CANEZrP2H8P0nh6224UKbnZ7EXrNE6jwM_SZSj6UaMn1QqWumDg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=mike@plan99$(echo .)net \
    --cc=bitcoin-development@lists$(echo .)sourceforge.net \
    --cc=cryptocurrencies@quidecco$(echo .)de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox