From: Nick ODell <nickodell@gmail•com>
To: Andrew <onelineproof@gmail•com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
<bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Multisig with hashes instead of pubkeys
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 10:35:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANN4kmcQGehMAVWdvakOam6n=crVnv5Gc6WGMg6WCstkD3XRPw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL8tG=n6NnTaeV71-sWi3Bvk_8E8F20_69f90k-Shrc4XXUQog@mail.gmail.com>
The first issue is that doing two OP_SWAP's in a row will just return
you to the original state. The second issue is that all of them end up
hashing the same key, so anyone on the network can spend this output.
(See https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Script for a good resource on opcodes
and what each of them do. There are also a few simulators floating
around, but I can't recommend any in particular.)
Third, if you're concerned about exposing public keys, why not use a
P2SH script? That won't expose your public keys until you spend from
it.
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Andrew via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is there a worked out scriptPubKey for doing multisig with just hashes
> of the participants? I think it is doable and it is more secure to a
> compromised ECDSA. I'm thinking something like this for the
> scriptPubKey:
> 2 OP_SWAP OP_SWAP OP_SWAP OP_DUP OP_HASH160 <pubKeyHash1>
> OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_DUP OP_HASH160 <pubKeyHash2> OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_DUP
> OP_HASH160 <pubKeyHash3> OP_EQUALVERIFY 3 OP_CHECKMULTISIG
>
> and <sigs><pubkeys> for the scriptSig
>
> Can anyone confirm or send me a link to the worked out script?
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> PGP: B6AC 822C 451D 6304 6A28 49E9 7DB7 011C D53B 5647
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-23 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-22 18:29 Andrew
2016-12-23 17:35 ` Nick ODell [this message]
2016-12-23 18:21 ` Matthew Roberts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CANN4kmcQGehMAVWdvakOam6n=crVnv5Gc6WGMg6WCstkD3XRPw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=nickodell@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists$(echo .)linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=onelineproof@gmail$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox