Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures

From: Pieter Wuille <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:20:25 -0500

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:18 PM, Matt Whitlock <[email-masked]> wrote:
> To be more in the C++ spirit, I would suggest changing the (const std::vector<unsigned char> &sig, size_t &off) parameters to (std::vector<unsigned char>::const_iterator &itr, std::vector<unsigned char>::const_iterator end).

I agree that is more in the spirit of C++, but part of the motivation
for including C++ code that it mostly matches the exact code that has
been used in the past two major Bitcoin Core releases (to interpret
signatures as standard).

-- 
Pieter