Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] On the optimal block size and why transaction fees are 8 times too low (or transactions 8 times too big)

From: Pieter Wuille <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 16:19:24 +0100

Correcting myself:

On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Pieter Wuille <[email-masked]> wrote:
> I believe that C. Decker's paper used measurements for propagation
> delays for blocks 180000-190000, which happened between may and juli
> 2012. The latest bitcoind/bitcoin-qt release at the time was 0.6.3.

They did use data from blocks 20000-210000, september-november 2012.
That was still before the 0.8 release, however.

-- 
Pieter