Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] New BIP: Dealing with OP_IF and OP_NOTIF malleability in P2WSH

From: Pieter Wuille <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 00:39:08 +0200

On Aug 17, 2016 00:36, "Russell O'Connor" <[email-masked]> wrote:

> Can I already do something similar with replace by fee, or are there
limits on that?

BIP125 and mempool eviction both require the replacing transaction to have
higher fee, to compensate for the cost of relaying the replaced
transaction(s).

-- 
Pieter