This is not the place to discuss the merits and/or issues of these BIPs, only whether they should be treated as final.


On Aug 25, 2016 10:51, "Marek Palatinus via bitcoin-dev" <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
As Luke pointed, BIP44 is already used by many wallets and to my knowledge people don't have any real world issues with that, including loading funds in another BIP44 wallet. I'm not saying that BIP44 is perfect from all points of view, but IMO it just works for most use cases. Let's set it as final, and propose competing standards which cover all your concerns.

slush

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Jonas Schnelli via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> The development paradigm of "maybe detect funds" is not something we
> should *not* encourage for Bitcoin IMO.

Sorry. That was one "not" to many.

</jonas>


_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev



_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev