From: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail•com>
To: Wladimir <laanwj@gmail•com>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version 0.9 goals
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 12:56:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPg+sBjTP5++MTAKZCqsuF_pnKz1QOo__dzZRtJ0_aBr9xuT6g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+s+GJDr-KhPdnNEuFAE325OUEa42ukJ_9yXcS8sJ+Y_w9LWyw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Wladimir <laanwj@gmail•com> wrote:
> Fully agreed about payment protocol, autotools and Qt5 build.
>
> I'm still not very excited about coin control (and last time I looked at the
> code, it has an issue that it introduced statefulness into the wallet model
> - a bane for concurrency. But that may be resolved?) . Anyway, many people
> seem to want that so it's fine with me, given that the issues are fixed.
As far as I can see, that state is gone, and is now passed in a
separate object to the transaction-creation methods.
I'd like to see it go in, as I believe it can be helpful in
understanding the difference between the high-level abstraction
(wallet) and the underlying implementation (individual coins) -
something that many people are confused about. I think that's even a
more important advantage than the ability for micro-management it
offers. Multiwallet would be more appropriate for avoiding linkage
between identities, but it seems there's little progress on that front
now.
--
Pieter
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-15 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-15 0:29 Gavin Andresen
2013-08-15 8:09 ` Mike Hearn
2013-08-15 8:22 ` slush
2013-08-15 9:02 ` Mike Hearn
2013-08-15 14:32 ` slush
2013-08-15 15:22 ` Mike Hearn
2013-08-15 8:37 ` Pieter Wuille
2013-08-15 21:12 ` Wendell
2013-08-15 10:12 ` Melvin Carvalho
2013-08-15 10:49 ` Wladimir
2013-08-15 10:56 ` Pieter Wuille [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPg+sBjTP5++MTAKZCqsuF_pnKz1QOo__dzZRtJ0_aBr9xuT6g@mail.gmail.com \
--to=pieter.wuille@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=bitcoin-development@lists$(echo .)sourceforge.net \
--cc=laanwj@gmail$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox