From: Me <jimmyjack@gmail•com>
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd•org>
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Significant losses by double-spending unconfirmed transactions
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 09:06:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E724A120-7F85-488B-81CD-B1CD8EB227E3@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150715155903.GC20029@savin.petertodd.org>
Have you talk to them? If not, how can you be sure they don’t run large number of standard nodes and actually make the network stronger? Personally I never bring claims like this if I just assume. A lot of people in the community really trust you, do you realize you potentially hurt them for no reason?
btw I do not work for them nor have any money invested in them in case anybody asks
> On Jul 15, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Peter Todd <pete@petertodd•org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 08:49:13AM -0700, Me wrote:
>>> Blockcypher's "confidence factor" model(1)
>>> under the hood - yet another one of those sybil attacking network
>>> monitoring things
>>
>>
>> Peter, I noticed on your twitter you have a lot of bad things to say about Blockcypher and their business model (which I might not full agree, but totally respect), can you share any evidence they perform any form of Sybil attack on the network, please.
>
> For Blockcypher to succesfully do what they claim to do they need to
> connect to a large % of nodes on the network; that right there is a
> sybil attack. It's an approach that uses up connection slots for the
> entire network and isn't scalable; if more than a few services were
> doing that the Bitcoin network would become significantly less reliable,
> at some point collapsing entirely.
>
> --
> 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
> 0000000000000000093f699ccdb323aa638af1131249ec2e1bacbf367163807a
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-15 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-15 3:29 simongreen
2015-07-15 14:35 ` Tom Harding
2015-07-15 15:18 ` Peter Todd
2015-07-15 15:49 ` Me
2015-07-15 15:53 ` Bastiaan van den Berg
2015-07-15 15:59 ` Peter Todd
2015-07-15 16:06 ` Me [this message]
2015-07-15 16:11 ` Pieter Wuille
2015-07-15 16:41 ` Me
2015-07-15 16:12 ` Milly Bitcoin
2015-07-15 18:25 ` Matthieu Riou
2015-07-15 19:32 ` Peter Todd
2015-07-15 19:57 ` Milly Bitcoin
2015-07-16 0:08 ` Matthieu Riou
2015-07-16 5:18 ` odinn
2015-07-17 11:59 ` Peter Todd
2015-07-17 12:56 ` Milly Bitcoin
2015-07-15 17:01 ` Adrian Macneil
2015-07-16 14:30 ` Arne Brutschy
2015-07-16 14:50 ` Me
2015-07-16 15:33 ` Greg Schvey
2015-07-18 11:43 ` Mike Hearn
2015-07-18 15:09 ` Peter Todd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E724A120-7F85-488B-81CD-B1CD8EB227E3@gmail.com \
--to=jimmyjack@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists$(echo .)linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=pete@petertodd$(echo .)org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox