Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] About the small number of bitcoin nodes

From: Felipe Micaroni Lalli <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 07:47:47 -0300

Is the small number of bitcoin nodes a concern? If yes, why? What kind of attack can the network suffer? And where can we find statistical information about the full nodes running?

I guess the only effective incentive to keep a node running would be financial. A kind of proof of stake would be nice on bitcoin. But I have no idea how to begin with.

Felipe Micaroni Lalli

Walltime: https://walltime.info
Bitcoin Paranoid Android developer
PGP ID: 0x4c0afccfed5cde14
BTC: 1LipeR1AjHL6gwE7WQECW4a2H4tuqm768N

On 19/05/2014, at 07:39, Wladimir <[email-masked]> wrote:

> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Wladimir <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> 
>> Some hacking with ncurses could quickly make a decent tool here. It
>> could be packaged with bitcoin itself but that's not necessary. For
>> example Tor has the tool 'arm' which is a separate package.
> 
> Regarding tor-arm, here are some screenshots:
> https://www.atagar.com/arm/screenshots.php
> 
> It shows, among other things:
> - bandwidth up/down graphs
> - CPU usage
> - debug logging (in real time)
> - connected peers+statistics
> - currently active configuration
> 
> Would be nice to have a similar tool for bitcoind.
> 
> Wladimir
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
> Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
> Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
> Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development