From: Eric Voskuil <eric@voskuil•org>
To: "David A. Harding" <dave@dtrt•org>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
<bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bech32 weakness and impact on bip-taproot addresses
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 12:15:53 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <FB218E84-0F03-4BDB-BB48-1EF45B44FDB9@voskuil.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191108021541.n3jk54vucplryrbl@ganymede>
> On Nov 8, 2019, at 11:16, David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 02:35:42PM -0800, Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>> In the current draft, witness v1 outputs of length other
>> than 32 remain unencumbered, which means that for now such an
>> insertion or erasure would result in an output that can be spent by
>> anyone. If that is considered unacceptable, it could be prevented by
>> for example outlawing v1 witness outputs of length 31 and 33.
>
> Either a consensus rule or a standardness rule[1] would require anyone
> using a bech32 library supporting v1+ segwit to upgrade their library.
> Otherwise, users of old libraries will still attempt to pay v1 witness
> outputs of length 31 or 33, causing their transactions to get rejected
> by newer nodes or get stuck on older nodes. This is basically the
> problem #15846[2] was meant to prevent.
>
> If we're going to need everyone to upgrade their bech32 libraries
> anyway, I think it's probably best that the problem is fixed in the
> bech32 algorithm rather than at the consensus/standardness layer.
As an implementer of both the address encoding and script validation, I agree.
e
> -Dave
>
> [1] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2019-November/017444.html
> [2] https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15846
>
> P.S. My thanks as well to the people who asked the question during
> review that lead to this discussion:
>
> http://www.erisian.com.au/meetbot/taproot-bip-review/2019/taproot-bip-review.2019-11-05-19.00.log.html#l-88
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-08 3:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-07 22:35 Pieter Wuille
2019-11-07 22:45 ` Greg Sanders
2019-11-08 0:41 ` Matt Corallo
2019-11-08 2:15 ` David A. Harding
2019-11-08 3:15 ` Eric Voskuil [this message]
2019-11-10 21:51 ` Pieter Wuille
2019-11-11 1:02 ` Matt Corallo
2019-11-13 2:56 ` Clark Moody
2019-11-13 5:32 ` ZmnSCPxj
2019-11-13 6:30 ` Pieter Wuille
2020-07-15 20:56 ` Russell O'Connor
2020-07-15 21:05 ` Greg Sanders
2020-07-15 21:11 ` Russell O'Connor
2019-11-08 5:11 ` ZmnSCPxj
2019-11-08 13:03 ` Russell O'Connor
2019-11-08 13:42 ` Damian Mee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=FB218E84-0F03-4BDB-BB48-1EF45B44FDB9@voskuil.org \
--to=eric@voskuil$(echo .)org \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists$(echo .)linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=dave@dtrt$(echo .)org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox