public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: alicexbt <alicexbt@protonmail•com>
To: Antoine Riard <antoine.riard@gmail•com>
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Contracting Primitives WG 1st Meeting, Tuesday 15 Nov. 18:00 UTC
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 22:36:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <KC6W2mW10GBn00XMNUJDUxp27BAOM94o1PE_CVpnMjKVLwPwLMiBQHCfNDZZqR619BMZJyq3hskVhK5T24Kr_v4MStTL4kx74z55qRU0bVY=@protonmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALZpt+E0PSc_DD39E1-3hGYvpw3ok91Nc5DLTTh9FPdOKF_TYg@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2752 bytes --]

Hi Bitcoin Developers,

> Looking forward to the first session, listening to everyone's thoughts about what could be the scope discussed by this new community process: anyprevout, recursive covenants, introspection, new malleability flags, ZK rollups, new contracting protocols and many more ideas!

Wanted to add CTV: BIP-119 OP_CHECKTEMPLATEVERIFY if OP missed it. Easiest and best possible way to get covenants aka tx introspection with lot of research and development.

/dev/fd0

Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.

------- Original Message -------
On Monday, November 14th, 2022 at 7:51 AM, Antoine Riard via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> Reminder: this is happening this _upcoming_ Tuesday.
> Looking forward to the first session, listening to everyone's thoughts about what could be the scope discussed by this new community process: anyprevout, recursive covenants, introspection, new malleability flags, ZK rollups, new contracting protocols and many more ideas!
> Best,
> Antoine
>
> Le lun. 31 oct. 2022 à 20:47, Antoine Riard <antoine.riard@gmail•com> a écrit :
>
>> Hi list,
>>
>> After I have been asked offline the exact date when those meetings were actually starting, I'm proposing Tuesday 15th November at 18:00 UTC, i.e 2 weeks from now. Thinking about a monthly frequency for now (from my experience attending dlcspecs/lighnting specs meetings/core dev meetings in the past, weekly sounds too much, biweekly/monthly sounds better though dunno yet good frequency).
>>
>> If there is an incompatibility with another public engineering meeting in the Bitcoin space, let it know. We can talk about a better schedule during the 1st session [0].
>>
>> Communication venue is #bitcoin-contracting-primitives-wg on Libera Chat [1]. Feel free to lurk already and ask questions.
>>
>> No consistent agenda beyond listening to every attendee their expectations, ideas, subjects of interests they would like to see happening with this new covenants/contracting primitives R&D process.
>>
>> If you have been working on a contracting protocols/side-chains/rollups/other use-cases that could benefit from extended Bitcoin contracting primitives, feel free to open an issue there: https://github.com/ariard/bitcoin-contracting-primitives-wg/issues
>>
>> Let it know if you have more questions or feedback.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Antoine
>>
>> [0] It would be great to have a schedule inclusive of most timezones we can, 18:00 UTC might be too early for Asian and Oceanic ones. Later, we start to be exclusive towards contributors in Eastern Europe.
>>
>> [1] There have been more voices suggesting jitsi/audio-based meetings rather than IRC. It's a cool format too, though coming with trade-offs.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4646 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-15 22:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-01  0:47 Antoine Riard
2022-11-14  2:21 ` Antoine Riard
2022-11-15 22:36   ` alicexbt [this message]
2022-11-15 23:49     ` Antoine Riard
2022-11-15 23:47 ` Antoine Riard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='KC6W2mW10GBn00XMNUJDUxp27BAOM94o1PE_CVpnMjKVLwPwLMiBQHCfNDZZqR619BMZJyq3hskVhK5T24Kr_v4MStTL4kx74z55qRU0bVY=@protonmail.com' \
    --to=alicexbt@protonmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=antoine.riard@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=bitcoin-dev@lists$(echo .)linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox