Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Taproot NACK

From: LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 05:46:49 +0000

Good Afternoon,

If you actually believe the operation of consensus and the discussion relevant to that is a mundane or philosophical dissection of people's ability to grasp a humorous while on-topic but obligatorily unnecessary conversation you may prefer if you enquire how Bitcoin is censorship-resistant.

KING JAMES HRMH
Great British Empire

Regards,
The Australian
LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH (& HMRH)
of Hougun Manor & Glencoe & British Empire
MR. Damian A. James Williamson
Wills

et al.

Willtech
www.willtech.com.au
www.go-overt.com
and other projects

earn.com/willtech
linkedin.com/in/damianwilliamson

m. 0487135719
f. +61261470192

This email does not constitute a general advice. Please disregard this email if misdelivered.
________________________________
From: ZmnSCPxj <[email-masked]>
Sent: Wednesday, 17 March 2021 3:19 PM
To: Aymeric Vitte <[email-masked]>; Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <[email-masked]>
Cc: LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH <[email-masked]>; R E Broadley <[email-masked]>; Eric Voskuil <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Taproot NACK

> It's incredible how this troll keeps trolling and the list (bitcoin-dev !!) keeping attention
>
> Good troll, really

Depending on topic raised, it may be useful to at least answer the troll naively as if it were an honest question, if only so that third parties reading do not get confused and think the troll is bringing up some objection that is actually relevant.

For this particular topic you replied to, it seems to me obviously inane to discuss the "lordship" and "majesty" of the troll.
Even if the claims to such "lordship" are *true*, for most of the world, the relevance of the previous British empire is little more than a reality TV show about the British royal family (oh, some random thing happened to some random descendant of the royal family, how interesting, say did you see that nice new (actually old) technique Jeremy was talking about on the other thread about delegating control of coins to script, it looks like "graftroot without a softfork"?), and any particular claims to nobility or aristocracy are largely moot, thus not worth answering.

Regards,
ZmnSCPxj