public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail•com>
To: Burak Keceli <burak@buraks•blog>
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ark: An Alternative Privacy-preserving Second Layer Solution
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 00:40:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <RqMGBWFiZaAWDLpHiElcCqoOINqnqO_QfmBEYHfV0zkCJhQkhkwxaboCnRF6_2xU8tcVFcnpKzzXRhu126dKvAlsUUg_tx9KUTFZFb4mM5s=@protonmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2021501773.1219513.1684816284977@eu1.myprofessionalmail.com>

Good morning Burak,

> > As the access to Lightning is also by the (same?) ASP, it seems to me that the ASP will simply fail to forward the payment on the broader Lightning network after it has replaced the in-mempool transaction, preventing recipients from actually being able to rely on any received funds existing until the next pool transaction is confirmed.
> 
> 
> Yes, that's correct. Lightning payments are routed through ASPs. ASP may not cooperate in forwarding HTLC(s) AFTER double-spending their pool transaction. However, it's a footgun if ASP forwards HTLC(s) BEFORE double-spending their pool transaction.

This is why competent coders test their code for footguns before deploying in production.

> What makes Ark magical is, in the collaborative case, users' ability to pay lightning invoices with their zero-conf vTXOs, without waiting for on-chain confirmations.

You can also do the same in Lightning, with the same risk profile: the LSP opens a 0-conf channel to you, you receive over Lightning, send out over Lightning again, without waiting for onchain confirmations.
Again the LSP can also steal the funds by double-spending the 0-conf channel open, like in the Ark case.

The difference here is that once confirmed, the LSP can no longer attack you.
As I understand Ark, there is always an unconfirmed transaction that can be double-spent by the ASP, so that the ASP can attack at any time.

> This is the opposite of swap-ins, where users SHOULD wait for on-chain confirmations before revealing their preimage of the HODL invoice; otherwise, the swap service provider can steal users' sats by double-spending their zero-conf HTLC.

If by "swap-in" you mean "onchain-to-offchain swap" then it is the user who can double-spend their onchain 0-conf HTLC, not the swap service provider.
As the context is receiving money and then sending it out, I think that is what you mean, but I think you also misunderstand the concept.

Regards,
ZmnSPCxj


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-05-24  0:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-22  7:54 Burak Keceli
2023-05-22 13:03 ` ZmnSCPxj
2023-05-23  4:31   ` Burak Keceli
2023-05-23 22:06     ` G. Andrew Stone
2023-05-24  0:40     ` ZmnSCPxj [this message]
2023-05-24  0:45       ` ZmnSCPxj
2023-05-24  7:53         ` Burak Keceli
2023-05-24  6:28       ` Burak Keceli
2023-05-24 20:20 ` adiabat
2023-05-24 23:02 ` David A. Harding
2023-05-26 11:56   ` Burak Keceli
2023-05-27 20:36     ` David A. Harding
2023-06-07 13:30       ` Burak Keceli
2023-08-06 22:43     ` Antoine Riard
2023-05-25 12:12 Ali Sherief
2023-05-26  7:33 jk_14
2023-05-28  6:02 Ali Sherief
2023-06-07 18:20 David A. Harding
2023-06-11  9:19 moonsettler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='RqMGBWFiZaAWDLpHiElcCqoOINqnqO_QfmBEYHfV0zkCJhQkhkwxaboCnRF6_2xU8tcVFcnpKzzXRhu126dKvAlsUUg_tx9KUTFZFb4mM5s=@protonmail.com' \
    --to=zmnscpxj@protonmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=bitcoin-dev@lists$(echo .)linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=burak@buraks$(echo .)blog \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox