Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Taproot NACK

From: LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 06:34:35 +0000

Good Afternoon,

You cannot liken the ability to scrutinise the public ledger to be the same as hiding information, it is like showing your palm while you are pointing at the back of your hand. The advice that I have is P2SH is scrutable once the UTXO is spent. Also, there is no public ledger obfuscation in creating new addresses, there is a plausible reduction in transaction linkage.

KING JAMES HRMH
Great British Empire

Regards,
The Australian
LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH (& HMRH)
of Hougun Manor & Glencoe & British Empire
MR. Damian A. James Williamson
Wills

et al.

Willtech
www.willtech.com.au
www.go-overt.com
and other projects

earn.com/willtech
linkedin.com/in/damianwilliamson

m. 0487135719
f. +61261470192

This email does not constitute a general advice. Please disregard this email if misdelivered.
________________________________
From: bitcoin-dev <[email-masked]> on behalf of Ryan Grant via bitcoin-dev <[email-masked]>
Sent: Saturday, 6 March 2021 1:04 AM
To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Taproot NACK

On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 8:48 PM LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH via
bitcoin-dev <[email-masked]> wrote:
> My concern was that the more complex scripts allow obfuscation of the Pay To address

This is no different from options available in P2SH, or from the
obfuscation achieved by generating a new address for a payment.
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
[email-masked]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev