public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd•org>
To: Bram Cohen <bram@chia•net>,
	Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
	<bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Merkleize All The Things
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 07:07:33 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2uYBYtz1tWLyGQY@petertodd.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHUJnBA7PUy3ajygdvvBwg6EyhUXGA-KKL_bkXLKCRPS98kRqw@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 934 bytes --]

On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 03:34:32PM -0800, Bram Cohen via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Another probably unhelpful bit of feedback I have is that Bitcoin should
> probably be taking verkle trees seriously because those can have
> substantially lower size/cost/weight than merkle trees. That doesn't just
> apply to this proposal, but to Bitcoin in general, which doesn't seem to
> have any serious verkle tree proposals to date.

Verkle trees only reduce proof sizes by a factor of 6-8, and they introduce
significant implementation complexity and new cryptographic assumptions. Better
to let other crypto-systems get a few more years of experience with them before
adding them to Bitcoin. Particularly since even having merkle trees in Bitcoin
is arguably a mistake: they allow for degenerate, weak, security modes like SPV
that aren't clearly good for Bitcoin as a whole.

-- 
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-09 12:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-08  9:17 Salvatore Ingala
2022-11-08 12:01 ` ZmnSCPxj
2022-11-10  9:42   ` Salvatore Ingala
2022-11-08 23:34 ` Bram Cohen
2022-11-09 12:07   ` Peter Todd [this message]
2022-11-10  7:39 ` David A. Harding
2022-11-11 21:49 ` Antoine Riard
2022-11-12 15:04   ` Salvatore Ingala
2022-11-30 19:42     ` Rijndael
2022-11-30 22:09       ` Rijndael
2022-12-01  8:47         ` Salvatore Ingala
2022-12-13  6:59           ` Billy Tetrud
2023-04-28  8:48             ` Johan Torås Halseth
2023-05-01 13:11               ` Salvatore Ingala
2023-05-01 21:15                 ` Salvatore Ingala
2023-05-04  8:34                   ` Johan Torås Halseth
2023-05-05 21:18                     ` Salvatore Ingala
2023-05-26 11:45                       ` Johan Torås Halseth
2023-05-28 10:24                         ` Salvatore Ingala
2023-05-30  7:34                           ` Johan Torås Halseth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y2uYBYtz1tWLyGQY@petertodd.org \
    --to=pete@petertodd$(echo .)org \
    --cc=bitcoin-dev@lists$(echo .)linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=bram@chia$(echo .)net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox