Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ephemeral Anchors: Fixing V3 Package RBF againstpackage limit pinning

From: Peter Todd <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 11:02:45 -0500

On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 09:07:29PM -0500, Greg Sanders wrote:
> I'm not particularly persuaded, but also not wedded to either idea.
> 
> Fixed up tests for the OP_TRUE case here:
> https://github.com/instagibbs/bitcoin/tree/ephemeral-anchors-true

Thanks.

Looking through that, I think a lot of those test cases don't actually need to
be changed to OP_2, as they aren't trying to test anything related to
standardness.

-- 
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org