This is getting messier than I initially thought it would. I was happy to +1 Kanzure and RubenSomsen and Murch would also get my +1 but some of these other names seem a touch peculiar to me. For example I think Jon Atack would make a great Core maintainer at some point in the future and I'm not sure a BIP editor should also be a Core maintainer given the independence sometimes required between Core and the BIP process. Also given Luke is struggling for time I'm not sure making Roasbeef a BIP editor makes sense given he is the maintainer of LND, maintainer of btcd and CTO of Lightning Labs unless he is winding down some of his other responsibilities. This is obviously not a criticism of either as they more than qualified to be maintainers of Core and LND/btcd. GIven the unexpected messiness I'll throw my hat into the ring. I was debating whether to initially as I've given a lot of thought to a BIP process update (BIP 3), closely followed Luke work through some of the frictions and tension points in the past and I disagree it is entirely an administrative task although it broadly is. Thanks Michael On Friday, March 29, 2024 at 1:14:29 AM UTC John C. Vernaleo wrote: > Fair enough, that was a less than useful comment of mine. > > Roasbeef's work on alternative clients and lightning make him technically > useful plus I've worked with him personally and know he is responive and > careful enough for the role. > > Can't speak directly about anyone else so no comment on the rest of them. > > ------------------------------------------------------- > John C. Vernaleo, Ph.D. > www.netpurgatory.com > j...@netpurgatory.com > ------------------------------------------------------- > > On Thu, 28 Mar 2024, Matt Corallo wrote: > > > Please provide justification rather than simply saying "I like Bob!". > > > > Matt > > > > On 3/28/24 12:09 PM, /dev /fd0 wrote: > >> I support Jon Atack and Roasbeef from this list. > >> > >> On Thursday, March 28, 2024 at 6:57:53 PM UTC+5:30 Murch wrote: > >> > >> I just went through the thread, previously mentioned were: > >> > >> - Kanzure > >> - Ruben Somsen > >> - Greg Tonoski > >> - Jon Atack > >> - Roasbeef > >> - Seccour > >> > >> And Matt just suggested me for the role. Hope I didn’t overlook anyone. > >> > >> On 3/27/24 19:39, John C. Vernaleo wrote: > >> > That said, I would find it helpful if someone could go through the > >> > thread and list all the people who've been proposed so people know > >> who > >> > they should be thinking about. > >> > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > >> "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group. > >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an > >> email to bitcoindev+...@googlegroups.com > >> . > >> To view this discussion on the web visit > >> > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/4c1462b7-ea1c-4a36-be81-7c3719157fabn%40googlegroups.com > >> < > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/4c1462b7-ea1c-4a36-be81-7c3719157fabn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer > >. > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an > > email to bitcoindev+...@googlegroups.com. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > > > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/6806b22d-043d-4201-841a-95e17cd8d542%40mattcorallo.com > . > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/a116fba3-5948-48d2-a787-639a3564d006n%40googlegroups.com.