Subject: Re: [bitcoindev] CHECKSIGFROMSTACK(VERIFY/ADD)

From: Murch <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 09:57:13 -0500

Hi everyone,

On 2024-11-14 17:02, Brandon Black wrote:
> * Should CHECKSIGFROMSTACKVERIFY (CSFSV) be added to pre-tapscript
> […]
> My personal thinking in initially including CSFSV in earlier script versions was basically that it's compatible with NOP forking, so why not.

If there is no compelling use case or concrete benefit, I don’t think "it’s compatible, why not" is convincing motivation, especially at the cost of a NOP.

On 2024-11-14 17:02, Brandon Black wrote:
> * Should we include CHECKSIGFROMSTACKADD?

I feel similar about this. If there is currently no demand for this, and future demand also seems unlikely, I would prefer a smaller, more focused set of changes.

Cheers,
Murch

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email-masked].
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/c91269ac-e579-4089-bf9a-fdc076e34727%40murch.one.