* [bitcoin-dev] Impacts of Segregated Witness softfork
@ 2015-12-09 14:30 jl2012
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: jl2012 @ 2015-12-09 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bitcoin-dev
Although the plan is to implement SW with softfork, I think many
important (but non-consensus critical) components of the network would
be broken and many things have to be redefined.
1. Definition of "Transaction ID". Currently, "Transaction ID" is simply
a hash of a tx. With SW, we may need to deal with 2 or 3 IDs for each
tx. Firstly we have the "backward-compatible txid" (bctxid), which has
exactly the same meaning of the original txid. We also have a "witness
ID" (wid), which is the hash of the witness. And finally we may need a
"global txid" (gtxid), which is a hash of bctxid|wid. A gtxid is needed
mainly for the relay of txs between full nodes. bctxid and wid are
consensus critical while gtxid is for relay network only.
2. IBLT / Bitcoin relay network: As the "backward-compatible txid"
defines only part of a tx, any relay protocols between full nodes have
to use the "global txid" to identify a tx. Malleability attack targeting
relay network is still possible as the witness is malleable.
3. getblocktemplete has to be upgraded to deal with witness data and
witness IDs. (Stratum seems to be not affected? I'm not sure)
4. Protocols relying on the coinbase tx (e.g. P2Pool, merged mining):
depends on the location of witness commitment, these protocols may be
broken.
Feel free to correct me and add more to the list.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2015-12-09 14:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-12-09 14:30 [bitcoin-dev] Impacts of Segregated Witness softfork jl2012
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox