From: "Eric Lombrozo" <elombrozo@gmail•com>
To: "Gregory Maxwell" <gmaxwell@gmail•com>,
"Bitcoin Dev" <bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed minor change to BIP 01 to use a PR for request assignment
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 18:41:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <em4118a7e8-3bd6-45e8-bce1-6c7c2d57e254@platinum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgR4iGshOgsammWQ93yD0GsckUgroX-sb7mDE7XuQb5k3g@mail.gmail.com>
I think it's a reasonable approach. Once the number is assigned, the
change is made and the pull request is updated.
Only thing is it would be nice to be able to indicate which pull
requests are number requests and which pull requests are ready for
merging. Perhaps we should make a special label for number requests.
- Eric
------ Original Message ------
From: "Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev"
<bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Bitcoin Dev" <bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org>
Sent: 9/3/2015 4:18:08 PM
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed minor change to BIP 01 to use a PR for
request assignment
>The process in BIP01 was written when we used a different solution for
>storing and presenting BIPs.
>
>I'm thinking of suggesting that the number request process be changed
>to opening a pull req with BIP text with no number (e.g. just using
>the authors name and an index as the number) as the mechenism to
>request number assignment.
>
>Is there any reason that anyone would find this objectionable?
>
>(Please do not respond to this message with anything but a strictly
>directed answer to that question, start a new thread for a different
>subject. Thanks!)
>_______________________________________________
>bitcoin-dev mailing list
>bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org
>https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-04 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-03 23:18 Gregory Maxwell
2015-09-03 23:45 ` Btc Drak
2015-09-04 0:17 ` Marco Pontello
2015-09-04 0:24 ` Gregory Maxwell
2015-09-04 15:24 ` Peter Todd
2015-09-04 15:33 ` Douglas Roark
2015-09-04 18:41 ` Eric Lombrozo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=em4118a7e8-3bd6-45e8-bce1-6c7c2d57e254@platinum \
--to=elombrozo@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists$(echo .)linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gmaxwell@gmail$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox