Referring to the subsidy for miners as "wasting it on miners" isn't going to garner you much favor. On May 20, 2014 11:12:53 AM CDT, Stephen Reed wrote: >I completed a whitepaper for Bitcoin a proof-of-stake version which >uses a single nomadic verifiable mint agent and distributed replication >of a single blockchain by compensated full nodes to achieve 6-hop, >sub-second transaction acknowledgement times. Plus it pays dividends to >holders instead of wasting it on miners. Subsidized transaction fees >are thus lower. > >https://docs.google.com/document/d/1C4m-MFnxw0JjDorzrKs_IRQRqD9ila79o0IDt6KsbcE > > >Because the code is not yet written, this idea is half-baked so to >speak. Comments appreciated on my project thread, which will be a >development diary. I plan a hard fork of the Bitcoin blockchain in >early 2016, after a year of public system testing, and conditioned on >wide approval. > >https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=584719.msg6397403#msg6397403 > >-Steve > >Stephen L. Reed >Austin, Texas, USA >512.791.7860 > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE >Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. >Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform >available >Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." >http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >Bitcoin-development mailing list >Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development