public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Schildbach <andreas@schildbach•de>
To: bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 70 refund field
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 12:25:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <lh3m7i$v18$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP0AwR3WgHfwYWcrC9Z_MHPDwymWXAQwp7D8XZ+o2FsK8g@mail.gmail.com>

I see the problem.

However, I don't see how PaymentDetails can be an answer. None of the
fields (other than outputs and network) can be known in advance (at the
time of the initial payment).

You're probably aiming for an expires field? How would you refund a
payment after expiry? Note its not your choice wether to refund a
payment -- it can be ordered by a court years after the payment happened.

Btw. another problem is that the refund address is currently unprotected.


On 03/28/2014 12:07 PM, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Modern devices like smartphones and tablets do not have swap files. This
> design is chosen to ensure responsive, fluid UI that can avoid blocking
> on disk regardless of how much multi-tasking is done, but it creates
> ripples that impact everything else.
> 
> One implication of this is that on these devices, we cannot store all
> keys or transactions in memory forever. BIP 70 has an expiry field for
> PaymentRequests that we can use to allow us to eventually stop loading
> those keys into RAM - at that point payments to those keys would no
> longer be recognised. But there's no equivalent for refund addresses.
> 
> More generally, though we re-used the output structure to define the
> refund, we didn't (for some reason that I forgot) reuse PaymentDetails,
> even though the payment details for a refund are indeed PaymentDetails.
> 
> Though I am loathe to go back and redesign this part of BIP 70 so soon
> after we shipped v1, it seems to me like the refund feature may be hard
> to implement on phones if there's no time limit for when you can receive
> a refund. Otherwise a wallet has to be looking out for refunds for
> payments you may have made years ago. So perhaps we should add a new
> refund field that embeds a PaymentDetails structure instead of being
> just a list of outputs.
> 
> We could try and solve this problem some other way purely internally, by
> doing a kind of wallet-specific swapping process in which things like
> Bloom filters are calculated without all keys in them being held in
> memory at once (perhaps caching filters for old parts of the key chain
> on disk), so you can have "infinite" wallets, but eventually the huge
> Bloom filters that would result would hurt efficiency in other ways. So
> key expiry seems pretty fundamental to scalability.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
> 





  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-28 11:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-28 11:07 Mike Hearn
2014-03-28 11:25 ` Andreas Schildbach [this message]
2014-03-28 11:31   ` Mike Hearn
2014-03-28 16:59     ` Andreas Schildbach
2014-03-28 18:19       ` Mike Hearn
2014-03-28 20:56         ` Andreas Schildbach
2014-03-29  9:27           ` Roy Badami
2014-03-29 13:29             ` Mike Hearn
2014-03-30 17:21               ` Andreas Schildbach
2014-03-28 11:38   ` Wladimir
2014-03-28 11:45     ` Tamas Blummer
2014-03-28 11:46       ` Mike Hearn
2014-03-28 11:54         ` Tamas Blummer
2014-03-28 12:27           ` Mike Hearn
2014-03-28 12:55             ` Tamas Blummer
2014-03-28 13:00               ` Mike Hearn
2014-03-28 13:09                 ` Tamas Blummer
2014-03-28 11:30 ` Tamas Blummer
2014-03-28 13:18   ` Tamas Blummer
2014-03-28 14:01     ` Gavin Andresen
2014-03-28 14:06       ` Mike Hearn
2014-03-28 14:27       ` Tamas Blummer
2014-03-28 15:23         ` Mike Hearn
2014-03-28 15:26           ` Tamas Blummer
2014-03-28 16:34             ` Mike Hearn
2014-03-28 16:45               ` Tamas Blummer
2014-03-31  9:23 ` Peter Todd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='lh3m7i$v18$1@ger.gmane.org' \
    --to=andreas@schildbach$(echo .)de \
    --cc=bitcoin-development@lists$(echo .)sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox