From: "Jeremy Spilman" <jeremy@taplink•co>
To: "Peter Todd" <pete@petertodd•org>,
"Gavin Andresen" <gavinandresen@gmail•com>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Making fee estimation better
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 00:51:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <op.w5h2rwhcyldrnw@laptop-air> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABsx9T0T0v=HnRRr6BLKNQOFMBJWrhF4G4SOCJ9DidGJBB8Eow@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 759 bytes --]
Gavin, can you confirm the best place to read up on the discuss fee
estimation changes for v0.9?
I think fee estimation at its core is about providing a data point, or
even call it an API, which can be used however you see fit.
What parameters do I want to see in a 'fee estimation' API?
- 30 minutes vs 24 hours processing time
- Confidence Levels (50%/90%)
What properties does the result have?
- Is it globally consistent?
Talking about fees.. I read this:
https://gist.github.com/gavinandresen/2961409 and there is so much there I
really liked.
Any pointers for reading more about the leading theories on transaction
fees? For example, how well do they correlate with network security? Are
we getting what we are paying for? :-)
[-- Attachment #2.1: Type: text/html, Size: 1168 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-25 7:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-24 14:30 Peter Todd
2013-10-24 14:38 ` Mike Hearn
2013-10-24 14:43 ` Peter Todd
2013-10-24 14:46 ` Mike Hearn
2013-10-24 14:54 ` Peter Todd
2013-10-24 20:39 ` Gavin Andresen
2013-10-25 7:07 ` Peter Todd
2013-10-25 12:02 ` Andreas Petersson
2013-10-25 13:29 ` Mark Friedenbach
2013-10-25 14:08 ` Andreas Petersson
2013-10-25 16:13 ` Peter Todd
2013-10-25 19:35 ` Jeremy Spilman
2013-10-25 22:13 ` Peter Todd
2013-10-25 7:51 ` Jeremy Spilman [this message]
2013-10-25 22:49 ` Peter Todd
2013-10-26 0:25 ` Gavin Andresen
2013-10-26 7:28 ` Peter Todd
2013-10-28 7:17 ` John Dillon
2013-11-04 10:52 ` [Bitcoin-development] Zeroconf-safe tx replacement (replace-for-fee) Peter Todd
2013-11-04 11:10 ` Adam Back
2013-11-04 11:59 ` Peter Todd
[not found] <mailman.289181.1382717617.21953.bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
2013-10-25 16:40 ` [Bitcoin-development] Making fee estimation better Tamas Blummer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=op.w5h2rwhcyldrnw@laptop-air \
--to=jeremy@taplink$(echo .)co \
--cc=bitcoin-development@lists$(echo .)sourceforge.net \
--cc=gavinandresen@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=pete@petertodd$(echo .)org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox