--- Log opened Mon Jan 07 00:00:13 2019 02:35 -!- TamasBlummer1 [~Thunderbi@p200300DD67243B42F8CE7FF12D0FFC2F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined #rust-bitcoin 02:36 -!- TamasBlummer [~Thunderbi@p200300DD67243B102C2B3D873270A7AE.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds] 02:36 -!- TamasBlummer1 is now known as TamasBlummer 03:28 -!- elichai2 [uid212594@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-chfdivujwaeohuzl] has joined #rust-bitcoin 05:40 < andytoshi> dongcarl: iirc they just need to be renamed don't they 05:40 < andytoshi> but no, no progress, and this week is no good for me because there's RWC and there's a bunch of libsecp and simplicity work that i'm behind on 06:47 < dongcarl> andytoshi: I'm more talking about how we want a Digest type that's only producible by hashing something, and another that doesn't have this requirement... 06:48 < dongcarl> More here: https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/bitcoin_hashes/pull/20 06:48 < dongcarl> And here: https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/bitcoin_hashes/issues/10 07:35 -!- michaelsdunn1 [~michaelsd@unaffiliated/michaelsdunn1] has joined #rust-bitcoin 08:12 < andytoshi> oh, yeah 08:13 < andytoshi> yeah, no progress, i need to spend some time thinking specifically about the design 12:58 < BlueMatt> ariard: hey, not sure where you got with give-monitor-preimage-after-channel-closure stuff but if it conflicts too heavily with https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-lightning/pull/284 I'm happy to rebase it 12:59 < BlueMatt> ariard: if you havent really worked on it thats fine, I'll try to get to it in a week or two 15:39 -!- michaelsdunn1 [~michaelsd@unaffiliated/michaelsdunn1] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 16:18 < ariard> BlueMatt: this https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-lightning/pull/269#discussion_r242002459 ? No I'm on tracking-revocation-claims-to-be-confirmed stuff now 16:18 < ariard> want to get it first 16:19 < ariard> BlueMatt: but will need this too to rebase on your news PRs, will start review tonight hopefully 16:19 < BlueMatt> ah, right, you said you were working on the delay 16:19 < BlueMatt> k 16:19 < BlueMatt> i can look into rebasing it on top of your work, up to you which is easier when you get to it 18:55 < ariard> BlueMatt: hmmm I implemented tracking, it broke a lot of tests due to more confirmations needed to fail-backward (obviously expected) but this reveals it may need more refactors 18:55 < ariard> so I'll review your stuff to get it first, and will rebase tracking later 18:57 < BlueMatt> ariard: ok, happy to help out or do whatever, just let me know 19:00 < ariard> BlueMatt: thanks, well not-related but pushed a new version of #271 yesterday :) 19:02 < BlueMatt> yup, I saw, working on a new fuzz test then will hopefully get to review it tomorrow --- Log closed Tue Jan 08 00:00:14 2019