--- Day changed Wed Nov 04 2015
00:24 -!- GAit [~GAit@2-230-161-158.ip202.fastwebnet.it] has joined #secp256k1
01:09 -!- [b__b] [~b__b]@ec2-54-85-45-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
01:10 -!- [b__b] [~b__b]@ec2-54-85-45-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has joined #secp256k1
01:13 -!- fkhan [weechat@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-icewhpcrqzxqibbq] has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
01:26 -!- fkhan [weechat@gateway/vpn/mullvad/x-etquhaflyhyuyfgu] has joined #secp256k1
03:15 -!- GAit [~GAit@2-230-161-158.ip202.fastwebnet.it] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
03:15 -!- GAit [~GAit@2-230-161-158.ip202.fastwebnet.it] has joined #secp256k1
07:39 -!- GAit [~GAit@2-230-161-158.ip202.fastwebnet.it] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
07:40 -!- GAit [~GAit@2-230-161-158.ip202.fastwebnet.it] has joined #secp256k1
08:07 -!- imposter [uid57046@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-sioxauxchyevikpm] has joined #secp256k1
11:10 -!- GAit [~GAit@2-230-161-158.ip202.fastwebnet.it] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
11:13 -!- GAit [~GAit@2-230-161-158.ip202.fastwebnet.it] has joined #secp256k1
11:15 -!- GAit [~GAit@2-230-161-158.ip202.fastwebnet.it] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
11:16 -!- GAit [~GAit@2-230-161-158.ip202.fastwebnet.it] has joined #secp256k1
11:55 -!- GAit [~GAit@2-230-161-158.ip202.fastwebnet.it] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
11:57 -!- GAit [~GAit@2-230-161-158.ip202.fastwebnet.it] has joined #secp256k1
11:57 -!- GAit [~GAit@2-230-161-158.ip202.fastwebnet.it] has quit [Client Quit]
12:09 -!- GAit [~GAit@2-230-161-158.ip202.fastwebnet.it] has joined #secp256k1
12:15 -!- GAit [~GAit@2-230-161-158.ip202.fastwebnet.it] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
12:26 -!- belcher [~user@unaffiliated/belcher] has joined #secp256k1
17:45 -!- imposter [uid57046@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-sioxauxchyevikpm] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
19:04 -!- belcher [~user@unaffiliated/belcher] has quit [Quit: Leaving]
20:46 < gmaxwell> A little bit of LOL WUT in an otherwise interesting paper, https://eprint.iacr.org/2015/1060.pdf
20:47 < gmaxwell> compared to Bitcoin’s incomplete mixed addition function secp256k1 gej add ge var, our
20:47 < gmaxwell> complete mixed addition saves 3S at the cost of 3M + 2a + 1mul int; and, compared to
20:47 < gmaxwell> Bitcoin’s doubling function secp256k1 gej double var, our formulas save 2S + 5mul int at
20:47 < gmaxwell> the cost of 3M + 3a. In this case it is unclear which set of formulas would perform faster
20:47 < gmaxwell> ...
20:47 < gmaxwell> Uh yes, square is faster than multiply otherwise we wouldn't square, we'd multiply. :P
21:16 < gmaxwell> ::sigh:: academics
21:19 < gmaxwell> andytoshi: so this looks like it will be faster than our constant time group code IF we can manage the multiplies by 21.
21:58 -!- imposter [uid57046@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-vruydrpubffyyyfp] has joined #secp256k1
23:24 -!- maaku [~quassel@botbot.xen.prgmr.com] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
23:27 -!- maaku [~quassel@botbot.xen.prgmr.com] has joined #secp256k1
23:27 -!- maaku is now known as Guest6253