--- Day changed Mon May 14 2018
00:04 -!- nickler_ [~nickler@185.12.46.130] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]     
00:04 -!- nickler [~nickler@185.12.46.130] has joined #secp256k1     
03:18 -!- jtimon [~quassel@52.29.134.37.dynamic.jazztel.es] has joined #secp256k1     
05:47 < andytoshi> if you don't have a fast multiexp, then it is 2x because you're reducing two scalar-point multiplies to one. i may have promulgated the "2x" number before i learned (a) that multiplications by G are way faster than other multiplications, so saving one is not as exciting as i thought; (b) that fast multiexponentiation was a thing
14:50 -!- belcher [~belcher@unaffiliated/belcher] has joined #secp256k1     
15:02 < gmaxwell> andytoshi: You were probably repeating figures from pieter and I, IIRC batch schnorr, ignoring point decompression costs, was ~2x faster asympotically w/ bos coster or something like that.
16:01 -!- arubi [~ese168@gateway/tor-sasl/ese168] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]     
16:02 -!- arubi [~ese168@gateway/tor-sasl/ese168] has joined #secp256k1     
17:37 -!- jtimon [~quassel@52.29.134.37.dynamic.jazztel.es] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]     
23:40 -!- jtimon [~quassel@52.29.134.37.dynamic.jazztel.es] has joined #secp256k1