--- Log opened Fri Feb 08 00:00:43 2019 00:39 -!- ddustin [~ddustin@unaffiliated/ddustin] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 00:40 -!- ddustin [~ddustin@unaffiliated/ddustin] has joined #secp256k1 00:44 -!- ddustin [~ddustin@unaffiliated/ddustin] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] 05:18 -!- Apocalyptic [~Apocalypt@unaffiliated/apocalyptic] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] 05:20 -!- arubi [~ese168@gateway/tor-sasl/ese168] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds] 05:26 -!- arubi [~ese168@gateway/tor-sasl/ese168] has joined #secp256k1 06:09 -!- Apocalyptic [~Apocalypt@unaffiliated/apocalyptic] has joined #secp256k1 08:02 -!- jtimon [~quassel@92.28.134.37.dynamic.jazztel.es] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds] 08:24 -!- jtimon [~quassel@92.28.134.37.dynamic.jazztel.es] has joined #secp256k1 09:41 -!- Cory [~Cory@unaffiliated/cory] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] 09:49 -!- Cory [~Cory@unaffiliated/cory] has joined #secp256k1 10:34 -!- ddustin [~ddustin@unaffiliated/ddustin] has joined #secp256k1 11:19 -!- ddustin [~ddustin@unaffiliated/ddustin] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 11:54 -!- ddustin [~ddustin@unaffiliated/ddustin] has joined #secp256k1 12:53 -!- ddustin [~ddustin@unaffiliated/ddustin] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds] 13:21 -!- ddustin [~ddustin@unaffiliated/ddustin] has joined #secp256k1 13:25 -!- jtimon [~quassel@92.28.134.37.dynamic.jazztel.es] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 13:34 -!- jtimon [~quassel@92.28.134.37.dynamic.jazztel.es] has joined #secp256k1 14:41 -!- ddustin [~ddustin@unaffiliated/ddustin] has quit [Remote host closed the connection] 14:42 -!- ddustin [~ddustin@unaffiliated/ddustin] has joined #secp256k1 14:46 -!- ddustin [~ddustin@unaffiliated/ddustin] has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds] 15:48 < sipa> gmaxwell: opinion on https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/586 ? 15:52 < gmaxwell> We should benchmark on arm (where we won't have ASM and where the performance will matter more). 15:53 < gmaxwell> 1.8% is a pretty big loss, and our tests should be strong enough that we're confident that miscompilation won't be an issue. 15:53 < gmaxwell> If we're not, we should make the tests stronger. 15:54 < gmaxwell> (would also be okay to temporarily disable, make the tests stronger, and reenable) 15:54 < gmaxwell> also, I would have commented previously, but I don't want to interact with someone on that PR. 16:00 < sipa> no reason why review can't be done here 16:03 < gmaxwell> Yep! thus my response. 16:03 < gmaxwell> I think that if we benchmark on arm and find no loss there (not implausable) then we might as well turn it off for now. If its at the same magnitude or worse, I'd rather not. 16:04 < gmaxwell> We could also seek some advice from compiler authors. 23:41 -!- kallewoof [~quassel@240d:1a:759:6000:a7b1:451a:8874:e1ac] has quit [Quit: No Ping reply in 180 seconds.] 23:42 -!- kallewoof [~quassel@240d:1a:759:6000:a7b1:451a:8874:e1ac] has joined #secp256k1 23:56 -!- deusexbeer [~deusexbee@093-092-176-118-dynamic-pool-adsl.wbt.ru] has quit [Quit: Konversation terminated!] --- Log closed Sat Feb 09 00:00:45 2019