--- Log opened Tue Nov 03 00:00:05 2020 00:04 -!- Cory [~Cory@unaffiliated/cory] has joined #secp256k1 01:38 -!- jesseposner [~jesse@98.37.146.62] has joined #secp256k1 01:45 -!- jesseposner [~jesse@98.37.146.62] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds] 02:54 -!- jonasschnelli [~jonasschn@2a01:4f9:2a:2510::2] has quit [Changing host] 02:54 -!- jonasschnelli [~jonasschn@unaffiliated/jonasschnelli] has joined #secp256k1 03:42 -!- jesseposner [~jesse@98.37.146.62] has joined #secp256k1 03:47 -!- jesseposner [~jesse@98.37.146.62] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds] 03:52 -!- belcher_ [~belcher@unaffiliated/belcher] has joined #secp256k1 03:55 -!- belcher [~belcher@unaffiliated/belcher] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds] 05:21 -!- belcher_ is now known as belcher 05:43 -!- jesseposner [~jesse@98.37.146.62] has joined #secp256k1 05:49 -!- jesseposner [~jesse@98.37.146.62] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds] 06:23 -!- jesseposner [~jesse@98.37.146.62] has joined #secp256k1 06:28 -!- jesseposner [~jesse@98.37.146.62] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds] 06:47 -!- nickler [~nickler@static.219.205.69.159.clients.your-server.de] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds] 06:47 -!- nickler [~nickler@static.219.205.69.159.clients.your-server.de] has joined #secp256k1 08:24 -!- jesseposner [~jesse@98.37.146.62] has joined #secp256k1 08:29 -!- jesseposner [~jesse@98.37.146.62] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] 08:39 -!- roconnor [~roconnor@host-192.252-162-14.dyn.295.ca] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds] 09:25 -!- roconnor [~roconnor@host-192.252-162-14.dyn.295.ca] has joined #secp256k1 09:29 -!- jesseposner [~jesse@98.37.146.62] has joined #secp256k1 09:35 -!- jesseposner [~jesse@98.37.146.62] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds] 10:41 -!- jesseposner [~jesse@98.37.146.62] has joined #secp256k1 10:46 -!- jesseposner [~jesse@98.37.146.62] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 11:10 -!- roconnor [~roconnor@host-192.252-162-14.dyn.295.ca] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds] 11:21 -!- jesseposner [~jesse@98.37.146.62] has joined #secp256k1 12:06 < elichai2> ja: just saying that libsecp is used wayyy beyond the "bitcoin ecosystem" 12:11 < ja> elichai2: if that was universally recognized, fedora wouldn't have had accepted the bcash libsecp fork, right? i would guess that according to their logic, "true code owner of bitcoin contested" implies "true code owner of libsecp256k1 contested" 12:12 < sipa> is it a fork, or just an old version with the old schnorr code still in? 12:12 < elichai2> sipa: I'm pretty sure a somewhat new version but with the old schnorr in it 12:12 < sipa> ok 12:13 < sipa> ja: my guess is there is really no value judgement, or care about version numbers 12:13 < sipa> and just whatever was submitted by someone was accepted 12:14 < elichai2> ja: all I hear is "fedora maintainers don't do a good job verifying packages" (maybe I'm a little too harsh) 12:16 < ja> sure, probably they just accepted whatever. but just it isn't commonly accepted to have "bitcoin" mean bcash, i think the same applies here 12:16 < ja> i will submit the legitimate package once 1.0 is out and see what happens 12:16 < sipa> cool 12:28 < real_or_random> sipa: the existence of these packages is one of my main motivations to release 1.0 12:29 < real_or_random> oh nice the arch package got an update apparently https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/libsecp256k1/ 12:30 < real_or_random> "Also enable the now stable ECDH module" ... at least seems to notice these changes 12:35 < elichai2> ja the only reverse dependency in ubuntu 20.04 and 18.04 is https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/jami / https://packages.ubuntu.com/bionic/ring which have nothing to do with bitcoin 12:36 < elichai2> real_or_random: yeah Arch maintainers are pretty serious 12:38 < sipa> elichai2: and those are build-time dependencies, not runtime ones 12:38 < sipa> presumably they statically link 12:39 < elichai2> Yeah I doubt any published software dynamically link to libsecp 12:39 < elichai2> I think only a few python things maybe 12:40 < ja> elichai2: what do you mean by published? for example, these haskell bindings will dynamically link, i think: https://github.com/haskoin/secp256k1-haskell/blob/master/secp256k1-haskell.cabal 12:41 < elichai2> I mean in the distro's repo 14:10 -!- roconnor [~roconnor@host-192.252-162-14.dyn.295.ca] has joined #secp256k1 15:39 -!- windsok_ [~windsok@rarepepe.cash] has quit [Changing host] 15:39 -!- windsok_ [~windsok@unaffiliated/windsok] has joined #secp256k1 15:39 -!- windsok_ is now known as windsok 16:03 -!- zmanian_ [sid113594@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-fmirhbzkpziqpejz] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer] 16:03 -!- digi_james [sid281632@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-hproigixxjvgxexh] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds] 16:03 -!- robot-dreams [sid463268@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-fpigosjmajlqgawx] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds] 16:04 -!- zmanian_ [sid113594@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-itclniurzjirqwoj] has joined #secp256k1 16:04 -!- robot-dreams [sid463268@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-pktvdeifsbsukigk] has joined #secp256k1 16:05 -!- digi_james [sid281632@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ktiktfplrpnflhdn] has joined #secp256k1 16:12 -!- jonatack [~jon@109.202.107.5] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds] 16:14 -!- jonatack [~jon@213.152.161.101] has joined #secp256k1 16:17 -!- jesseposner [~jesse@98.37.146.62] has quit [Quit: Lost terminal] 19:49 -!- jonatack [~jon@213.152.161.101] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds] 19:51 -!- jonatack [~jon@88.124.242.136] has joined #secp256k1 20:18 -!- jonatack [~jon@88.124.242.136] has quit [Ping timeout: 258 seconds] 21:30 -!- jonatack [~jon@88.124.242.136] has joined #secp256k1 --- Log closed Wed Nov 04 00:00:06 2020