--- Log opened Sat Nov 07 00:00:09 2020
01:42 -!- reallll is now known as belcher
05:00 < elichai2> In the usage examples, I'm thinking of renaming current `keygen.c` to `ecdsa.c` which will involve both keygen and signing. and then a corresponding `schnorrsig.c` which will do the same
05:02 < elichai2> trying to decide if keygen + signing + verification should be together or should there be a `keygen_ecdsa.c`and `ecdsa.c` (or even splitting further to `ecdsa_sign.c` and `ecdsa_verify.c`, but that will make it 7-8 separate examples)
11:34 -!- sipa_ [~pw@gateway/tor-sasl/sipa1024] has joined #secp256k1
11:36 -!- sipa [~pw@gateway/tor-sasl/sipa1024] has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
11:48 < ja> elichai2: given that a lot of applications would not need to sign much, i think it would be nice to have verification be separate
11:49 < ja> just my 2 cents, i think it is a great idea either way
11:50 < sipa_> i think examples can be simpler if they're merged; e.g. you don't need to show code to retrieve a signature from somewhere, you just use the result of the signing operation
11:52 -!- sipa_ is now known as sipa
12:41 < sipa> but no strong opinion either
12:49 -!- jonatack [~jon@213.152.161.30] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
12:49 -!- dongcarl [~dongcarl@unaffiliated/dongcarl] has quit [Quit: Ping timeout (120 seconds)]
12:50 -!- dongcarl [~dongcarl@unaffiliated/dongcarl] has joined #secp256k1
13:14 -!- jonatack [~jon@88.124.242.136] has joined #secp256k1
13:19 -!- jonatack [~jon@88.124.242.136] has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
13:19 -!- jonatack [~jon@134.19.179.27] has joined #secp256k1
18:12 -!- sipa [~pw@gateway/tor-sasl/sipa1024] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
18:17 -!- sipa [~pw@gateway/tor-sasl/sipa1024] has joined #secp256k1
19:53 -!- reallll [~belcher@unaffiliated/belcher] has joined #secp256k1
19:55 -!- belcher [~belcher@unaffiliated/belcher] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
--- Log closed Sun Nov 08 00:00:10 2020