--- Log opened Wed Sep 03 00:00:29 2025
01:28 -!- tromp [~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:41bc:975b:4e15:a306] has quit [Quit: My iMac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
01:40 -!- tromp [~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:41bc:975b:4e15:a306] has joined #secp256k1
03:03 -!- theStack [~theStack@95.179.145.232] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
03:08 -!- tromp [~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:41bc:975b:4e15:a306] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
03:46 -!- tromp [~textual@89-99-43-152.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl] has joined #secp256k1
04:15 -!- tromp [~textual@89-99-43-152.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl] has quit [Quit: My iMac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
05:24 -!- tromp [~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:41bc:975b:4e15:a306] has joined #secp256k1
06:23 -!- jerryf_ [~jerryf@user/jerryf] has joined #secp256k1
06:27 -!- jerryf [~jerryf@user/jerryf] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
06:29 -!- jerryf_ [~jerryf@user/jerryf] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
06:31 -!- jerryf [~jerryf@user/jerryf] has joined #secp256k1
06:40 -!- tromp [~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:41bc:975b:4e15:a306] has quit [Quit: My iMac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
07:14 -!- tromp [~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:41bc:975b:4e15:a306] has joined #secp256k1
07:33 -!- tromp [~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:41bc:975b:4e15:a306] has quit [Quit: My iMac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
07:46 -!- jonatack [~jonatack@user/jonatack] has joined #secp256k1
08:01 -!- tromp [~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:41bc:975b:4e15:a306] has joined #secp256k1
08:19 -!- tromp [~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:41bc:975b:4e15:a306] has quit [Quit: My iMac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
08:19 -!- jonatack [~jonatack@user/jonatack] has quit [Quit: WeeChat 4.7.1]
08:28 -!- jonatack [~jonatack@user/jonatack] has joined #secp256k1
08:43 -!- tromp [~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:41bc:975b:4e15:a306] has joined #secp256k1
09:16 -!- jerryf [~jerryf@user/jerryf] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
09:18 -!- jerryf [~jerryf@user/jerryf] has joined #secp256k1
09:35 -!- jerryf_ [~jerryf@user/jerryf] has joined #secp256k1
09:35 -!- jerryf [~jerryf@user/jerryf] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
09:43 -!- tromp [~textual@2001:1c00:3487:1b00:41bc:975b:4e15:a306] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
10:00 -!- jerryf_ [~jerryf@user/jerryf] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
10:00 -!- jerryf [~jerryf@user/jerryf] has joined #secp256k1
10:48 -!- jerryf [~jerryf@user/jerryf] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
10:48 -!- jerryf [~jerryf@user/jerryf] has joined #secp256k1
12:35 < stratospher[m]> Is there a particular use case for building with -DDETERMINISTIC? (where we don't get file:line details when crash happens)
12:37 < sipa> stratospher[m]: it lets you compile with and without a patch, to see if the resulting compilation result is identical
12:44 -!- jerryf_ [~jerryf@user/jerryf] has joined #secp256k1
12:44 -!- jerryf [~jerryf@user/jerryf] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
13:06 -!- jerryf_ [~jerryf@user/jerryf] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
13:06 -!- jerryf [~jerryf@user/jerryf] has joined #secp256k1
13:21 < bitcoin-git> [secp256k1] Raimo33 closed pull request #1703: [WIP] Add intel simd (master...simd) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/1703
13:27 < bitcoin-git> [secp256k1] Raimo33 reopened pull request #1703: [WIP] Add intel simd (master...simd) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/1703
13:42 < fjahr> I'm curious if there are guidelines for new modules if they should be declared experimental or not? I am asking because I noticed that the Silent Payments PR currently doesn't mark the module as experimental while the batch PR does.
13:45 < fjahr> There has certainly gone much more attention to silentpayments overall but batching Schnorr is a concept that has been around for a long time and was part of BIP340. Both have usage of their functionality in core lined up should they be merged, so I guess I am curious if there is a specific reason why batch should be marked experimental.
13:47 < fjahr> (a reason which I am missing)
15:56 < fjahr> Another stupid question: Generally the module functions should always have the module name after the library, i.e. secp256k1_mymodule_xxx right? I just got curious if there are exceptions when I found https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/blob/master/src/modules/musig/session_impl.h#L592 but that might just have been an oversight in the naming?
16:27 -!- Guest19 [~Guest19@142.154.118.108] has joined #secp256k1
16:31 -!- Guest19 [~Guest19@142.154.118.108] has quit [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
16:51 -!- jerryf_ [~jerryf@user/jerryf] has joined #secp256k1
16:52 -!- jerryf [~jerryf@user/jerryf] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
18:24 -!- BlueMatt [~BlueMatt@ircb.bluematt.me] has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
18:25 -!- BlueMatt [~BlueMatt@ircb.bluematt.me] has joined #secp256k1
19:49 -!- jerryf_ [~jerryf@user/jerryf] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
19:50 -!- jerryf [~jerryf@user/jerryf] has joined #secp256k1
20:23 -!- jonatack [~jonatack@user/jonatack] has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
21:32 -!- jerryf [~jerryf@user/jerryf] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
21:32 -!- jerryf_ [~jerryf@user/jerryf] has joined #secp256k1
--- Log closed Thu Sep 04 00:00:30 2025