From: "John Light" <bitcoin-dev@lightco•in>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Validity Rollups on Bitcoin
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 11:40:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <689ed481-e7eb-4fea-8ca7-578503f3f285@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
Hi all,
Today I am publishing "Validity Rollups on Bitcoin", a report I produced as part of the Human Rights Foundation's ZK-Rollup Research Fellowship.
Here's the preface:
> Ever since Satoshi Nakamoto first publicly announced bitcoin, its supporters, critics, and skeptics alike have questioned how the protocol would scale as usage increases over time. This question is more important than ever today, as blocks are increasingly full or close to full of transactions. So-called "Layer 2" (L2) protocols such as the Lightning Network have been deployed to take some transaction volume "offchain" but even Lightning needs to use _some_ bitcoin block space. It's clear that as bitcoin is adopted by more and more of the world's population (human and machine alike!) more block space will be needed. Another thread of inquiry concerns whether bitcoin's limited scripting capabilities help or hinder its value as electronic cash. Researchers and inventors have shown that the electronic cash transactions first made possible by bitcoin could be given new form by improving transaction privacy, supporting new types of smart contracts, and even creating entirely new blockchain-based assets.
>
> One of the results of the decade-plus research into scaling and expanding the capabilities of blockchains such as bitcoin is the invention of the validity rollup. Given the observed benefits that validity rollups have for the blockchains that have already implemented them, attention now turns to the question of whether they would be beneficial for bitcoin and existing bitcoin L2 protocols such as Lightning, too. We explore this question by examining validity rollups from several angles, including their history, how they work on a technical level, how they could be built on bitcoin, and what the benefits, costs, and risks of building them on bitcoin might be. We conclude that validity rollups have the potential to improve the scalability, privacy, and programmability of bitcoin without sacrificing bitcoin's core values or functionality as a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Given the "trustless" nature of validity rollups as cryptographically-secured extensions of their parent chain, and given bitcoin's status as the most secure settlement layer, one could even say these protocols are a _perfect match_ for one another.
You can find the full report here:
https://bitcoinrollups.org
Happy to receive any comments and answer any questions the bitcoin dev community may have about the report!
Best regards,
John Light
next reply other threads:[~2022-10-11 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-11 15:40 John Light [this message]
2022-10-12 13:28 ` Greg Sanders
2022-10-12 15:40 ` John Light
2022-11-02 17:19 ` AdamISZ
2022-11-04 19:53 ` Trey Del Bonis
2022-11-04 20:29 ` Russell O'Connor
2022-11-04 23:07 ` ZmnSCPxj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=689ed481-e7eb-4fea-8ca7-578503f3f285@app.fastmail.com \
--to=bitcoin-dev@lightco$(echo .)in \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists$(echo .)linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox