2015-01-31.log

--- Log opened Sat Jan 31 00:00:40 2015
-!- Viper168 [~Viper@unaffiliated/viper168] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]00:06
-!- Viper168 [~Viper@unaffiliated/viper168] has joined ##hplusroadmap00:07
-!- ebowden [~ebowden@CPE-144-131-35-125.lns4.dav.bigpond.net.au] has joined ##hplusroadmap00:10
-!- Viper168 [~Viper@unaffiliated/viper168] has quit [Max SendQ exceeded]00:10
-!- phm4242 [~o@boole.london.hackspace.org.uk] has joined ##hplusroadmap00:18
-!- voidfire [~voidfire@shellie.darchoods.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]00:58
-!- voidfire [~voidfire@shellie.darchoods.net] has joined ##hplusroadmap00:59
JayDuggerAny activity using a blockchain for inventory control?01:11
JayDuggerI'd ask in a BTC channel, but I don't want to wade through the noise of speculators and wishful groupthinking.01:11
ebowdenpaperbot: http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/130702/ncomms3114/full/ncomms3114.html01:12
justanotheruserJayDugger: does inventory control require trustless consensus?01:39
-!- Viper168 [~Viper@unaffiliated/viper168] has joined ##hplusroadmap01:51
-!- lichen [~lichen@c-50-139-11-6.hsd1.or.comcast.net] has joined ##hplusroadmap02:05
-!- chris_99 [~chris_99@unaffiliated/chris-99/x-3062929] has joined ##hplusroadmap02:19
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has quit [Quit: Reconnecting]02:26
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has joined ##hplusroadmap02:26
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has quit [Quit: Reconnecting]02:45
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has joined ##hplusroadmap02:46
-!- ebowden [~ebowden@CPE-144-131-35-125.lns4.dav.bigpond.net.au] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]03:18
-!- delinquentme [~delinquen@162-245-22-166.v250d.PUBLIC.monkeybrains.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]03:20
-!- Vutral [~ss@mirbsd/special/Vutral] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]03:36
-!- ebowden [~ebowden@CPE-144-131-35-125.lns4.dav.bigpond.net.au] has joined ##hplusroadmap03:41
-!- Vutral [~ss@mirbsd/special/Vutral] has joined ##hplusroadmap03:43
JayDuggerjustanotheruser: Yes.04:02
JayDuggerjustanotheruser: Rather, I imagine it can benefit from it.04:03
justanotheruserJayDugger: how?04:04
justanotheruserinventory?04:04
justanotheruserlike a companies inventory? Where a group of people count what they have and you believe them?04:04
JayDuggerAgain, yes.04:04
JayDuggerIn particular, I imagine stock and supply for internal uses, rather than inventory for sale.04:05
justanotheruserJayDugger: what benefit does a blockchain provide over the people counting signing a message including the counts?04:06
justanotheruserthat question applies to internal uses as well04:10
justanotheruserwhy can't they workers just commit to a log of all inventory changes the company manages04:10
JayDuggerWow...you alternate good questions with bad ones.04:11
JayDuggerThank you for posing "what benefit does a blockchain provide over the people counting signing a message including the counts?"04:11
JayDuggerThat gives me something to consider.04:12
justanotherusersince my second question is a bad one, do you have an answer?04:12
JayDuggerTheft, pilferage, laziness...04:12
JayDuggerNone of which a blockchain magically prevents, I admit.04:13
justanotheruseryes, I was about to ask that...04:13
JayDuggerSocratic method aside, have you got an answer to my original question?04:14
justanotheruserwhich one?04:14
justanotheruser04:10 < JayDugger> Any activity using a blockchain for inventory control?04:15
JayDuggerYes.04:15
justanotherusermaybe by some company using the blockchain buzzword but not understanding what the blockchain is useful for.04:15
justanotheruserwww.coindesk.com/ibm-executive-block-chain-internet-of-things/04:15
justanotheruserI actually emailed them.. never got a response04:15
JayDuggerI vaguely remember that article. Thank you for the link.04:16
justanotheruserjust an fyi, I think they are either idiots for doing this, or smart enough to promote their product with the buzzword blockchain and it will end up looking nothing like a blockchain04:17
justanotheruserSocratic method aside, within a company you are already trusting the CEO and his board of directors along with the US government (fraud law enforcement) to not steal your ownership of the company and dividends. It might be interesting for the US government to do some timestamping for businesses04:19
JayDuggerYes, rereading that article reveals why it didn't stick the first time.04:19
justanotheruserinconsistencies in the database could be found simply by having them publish a log of changes and have individual auditors and shareholders check it too04:19
-!- CheckDavid [uid14990@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-xhnlxqlewjbnfxns] has joined ##hplusroadmap04:20
JayDuggerI think you grossly overestimate the technological savvy of your average bureaucrat and average businessman.04:20
justanotheruserJayDugger: then you can't expect a blockchain to keep them accountable either04:21
justanotheruserif there is a fork (or whatever the equivalent would be called in centralized auditable accounting systems) then that could be proven04:21
-!- justanot1eruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has joined ##hplusroadmap04:24
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has quit [Quit: Reconnecting]04:24
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has joined ##hplusroadmap04:26
-!- justanot1eruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has quit [Client Quit]04:28
-!- weles [~mariusz@wsip-174-78-132-9.ri.ri.cox.net] has joined ##hplusroadmap05:20
-!- cntrational [~sid@49.205.77.125] has quit [Quit: WeeChat 1.2-dev]05:29
kanzureauuuuuugh motion to ban JayDugger05:36
phm4242reason(s)?05:42
archelshe says "good morning" a lot05:45
archelsI mean, mornings? good?05:45
archelsburn at the stake!05:45
paskynow he wished a good evening too05:49
maakukanzure: if an apt-get for electronics could be done more easily (or an apt-get for 3d printing), I'd do that05:50
maakuwalk before you run05:50
justanotheruserkanzure: its your channel. If you ban his it's probably appropriate to ban nmz as well though :P05:51
kanzurephm4242: misappropration of lbockchain concepts05:53
kanzurearchels: greetings are not entirely banworthy05:54
kanzuremaaku: 3d printing doesn't work- it's not like people are writing millions of pages of documentation about how to make your 3d printed part. and plus, there's usually no dependencies anyway.05:54
kanzurejustanotheruser: er, what would be the reasons to ban nmz787?05:54
justanotheruserwasn't he misunderstanding bitcoin (in a way that is probably worse) with foldingcoin?05:55
justanotheruserwell I guess I don't know your reason to want to ban JayDugger, but I assume its misunderstanding the blockchain05:56
kanzureright.. i think the banworthy offense there was "pretending to understand bitcoin" or something05:56
phm4242kanzure: Which concept did it misappropriate?05:56
kanzurephm4242: everything05:56
justanotheruserlol05:56
justanotheruserphm4242: the PoW part05:57
kanzurethe inventory part05:57
kanzurethe blockchain part05:57
kanzureall of it05:57
justanotheruserwait is phm nmz or JayDugger05:57
kanzureer, it was JayDugger05:57
kanzureyou were just having the conversation with him05:57
justanotheruseryes, I thought it was nmz for some reason05:57
kanzurei suppose i've heard stranger things?05:58
justanotheruserIt's not that bad IMO, foldingcoin is more fundamental06:00
phm4242<jrayhawk> Yeah, I'm quite surprised that didn't happen. I personally didn't do it because watching kanzure bash his head against a wall for several hours is actually kinda funny.06:01
-!- cntrational [~sid@49.205.77.125] has joined ##hplusroadmap06:01
justanotheruserIt's not *that* obvious that when you are merely using the blockchain as an auditing tool rather than a tool to guarantee payment without trust, that you can have a centralized system and produce a fraud proof by auditing the companies records in a similar way.06:03
kanzurenormal databases should be obvious06:04
kanzurethere are very very few excuses06:04
justanotheruseryes, but fraud proofs aren't06:05
justanotheruserif you want a similar effect, you can have the company broadcast timestamped records to whatever auditing parties are interested and they can show conflicting messages as proof06:05
justanotheruserbut even with a blockchain being unnecessary, I wonder how useful such a fraud proof would be. Seems like there would be many tricks around it. "This inventory is defective". "This business meeting cost $1million (it really cost $500k)"06:07
phm4242timestamps. Why didn't satoshi think of that?06:08
justanotheruser...06:08
justanotheruserread what I said again. They accomplish the same thing so the blockchain isn't necessary. I'm not saying it can't be accomplished with a blockchain, I'm saying theres no reason to use a blockchain.06:09
phm4242So why did satoshi?06:10
justanotheruserwhy did he what?06:10
phm4242use a blockchain06:10
justanotheruserfor trustless decentralized consensus06:11
maakuphm4242: bitcoin is solving a different problem06:11
maakudistributed concensus with an anonymous and dynamic membership set requires a blockchain06:11
maakuit's basically the only thing which does06:11
-!- AmbulatoryCortex [~Ambulator@173-31-9-188.client.mchsi.com] has joined ##hplusroadmap06:12
paskyphm4242: you want your decisions recorded so they can't be tampered with in the future, but the key here is whether only a single party is making decisions or whether anyone can do them06:13
kanzureyou shoud be aware that phm4242 is a known troll and wastes your time06:14
paskyanyone knows why is it so friggin cold in tokyo (indoors) in winter?06:14
paskyjapan, pinnacle of civilization, and they are woefully unaware of concepts of heating rooms06:15
paskys/concepts/the concept/06:15
phm4242justanotheruser: So when you were talking about 'broadcast timestamped records', trust is not an issue?06:16
maakupasky: the japanese 'aesthetic' is no insulation06:18
paskynoone isn't sitting on tatami around here anyway06:19
kanzurehave you two synchronized your terribe ai plans yet?06:20
phm4242kanzure defines trolling as 'getting told why you're wrong'06:25
kanzurehaha06:26
-!- ivan` [~ivan@unaffiliated/ivan/x-000001] has quit [Quit: ERC Version 5.3 (IRC client for Emacs)]06:26
kanzurekeep trying06:26
kanzurearen't you the island fucker?06:26
phm4242the what/06:26
kanzureread the logs06:27
phm4242Why?06:27
phm4242should I grep 'island fucker' or what?06:28
kanzure12:18 < p42___> huh? I want you to come, but I don't want to use violence.06:29
kanzureyour memory sucks and i hate you for this06:29
-!- ivan` [~ivan@unaffiliated/ivan/x-000001] has joined ##hplusroadmap06:29
phm4242What does that have to do with fucking islands?06:29
kanzurei just told you to read the log, and now where to find it in the logs, so now you can kindly fuck off and go read it06:30
phm4242I've read the logs already. I still have no idea what you're talking about 'island fucker' for06:30
maakukanzure: dereference "you two"06:30
kanzuremaaku: pasky06:30
paskyI admit I forgot maaku has ai plans :)06:30
maakupasky: aparantly we're both working on (terrible) ai plans06:31
paskymaaku: do you have ai plans? what ai plans?06:31
paskymaaku: my ai plan is https://github.com/brmson06:31
maakui'm happy to sync on that although i'm literally about to go afk. but my bouncer will catch anything06:31
paskyme too06:31
maakuawesome. i could use an open source watson06:31
paskywell of course my ai plans are more than that, but for the rest, i could use an open source watson06:32
maakumy plan in one sentence is a fixed CogPrime design with planning engines and model discovery suitable for answering "sudo build me a nanofactory design implementable with current tech" when hooked up to a density-functional quantum simulator for learning/testing06:32
maakubut the next stuff i want to do after that requires watson like capabilities ("design me experiments for accomplishing the SENS objectives, organized as a decision tree")06:33
maakuanyway, going afk for a number of hours (but online capturing logs)06:34
-!- Zinglon [~Zinglon@ip565f6f48.direct-adsl.nl] has joined ##hplusroadmap06:34
-!- cntrational [~sid@49.205.77.125] has quit [Quit: WeeChat 1.2-dev]06:34
paskyi think we'll catch each other later, these are very similar to my plans actually but starting with the watson part seemed most meaningful06:34
paskyi want that to do resolution for things like "nanofactory design implementable with current tech", eventually06:35
paskybut ideally it'd be useful and making some money for its development much earlier than that06:35
-!- Zinglon [~Zinglon@ip565f6f48.direct-adsl.nl] has quit [Client Quit]06:36
maakui don't think you need watson like tech for the nanofactory example06:36
maakubut we can discuss that later. afk for reals06:36
-!- Zinglon [~Zinglon@ip565f6f48.direct-adsl.nl] has joined ##hplusroadmap06:37
paskypossibly, maybe I didn't really get the example06:37
-!- ebowden [~ebowden@CPE-144-131-35-125.lns4.dav.bigpond.net.au] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]06:38
justanotheruserphm4242: trust is an issue, but it isn't any less of an issue with a blockchain06:40
-!- Zinglon [~Zinglon@ip565f6f48.direct-adsl.nl] has quit [Client Quit]06:40
-!- Zinglon [~Zinglon@ip565f6f48.direct-adsl.nl] has joined ##hplusroadmap06:41
phm4242justanotheruser: What are you talking about? Not wanted to trust people is why the blockchain exists.06:41
kanzurethat's the stupidest thing you've ever said to me06:42
phm4242why?06:42
kanzurejust because someone makes a transaction that includes some extra data does not make that data trustless you moron06:42
-!- strangewarp_ [~strangewa@c-76-25-206-3.hsd1.co.comcast.net] has joined ##hplusroadmap06:42
kanzurehow would you even suggest that06:42
kanzurewhy are you wasting our time06:42
justanotheruserkanzure: is this the stalker?06:43
-!- strangewarp [~strangewa@c-76-25-206-3.hsd1.co.comcast.net] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]06:43
kanzureno06:43
kanzuredefinitely not06:43
phm4242I do stalk Kanz. He just don't know about it.06:43
justanotheruserokay, I thought you were saying he was with 12:18 < p42___> huh? I want you to come, but I don't want to use violence.06:43
kanzureno i was answering his question about where in the logs06:44
justanotheruserI mean the stalker would want you to come to his island to thaw his mom06:44
kanzure(that was aorund the time he revealed that he was a fucking idiot)06:44
kanzure*around06:44
chris_99look at the IP of  p42___ ;)06:44
justanotheruseryes06:44
justanotheruserit is a hackerspace06:44
justanotheruserSOMETHING YOU ARE PROMOTING kanzure06:44
phm4242:-006:44
kanzureyes hackerspaces often attract totally crazy morons06:44
justanotheruser09:40 < phm4242> justanotheruser: What are you talking about? Not wanted to trust people is why the blockchain exists.06:45
kanzurejustanotheruser: http://gnusha.org/bitcoin-wizards/2015-01-23.log06:45
-!- ebowden [~ebowden@CPE-144-131-35-125.lns4.dav.bigpond.net.au] has joined ##hplusroadmap06:45
kanzurewhoops06:45
phm4242< jrayhawk> Kanzure is not gracious.06:45
maakuso aparantly my wife is delayed and i have more time than I thought06:45
justanotheruserWouldn't it be great if anything done with a blockchain was trust free?06:45
kanzurehttp://gnusha.org/logs/2015-01-23.log06:45
-!- strangewarp [~strangewa@c-76-25-206-3.hsd1.co.comcast.net] has joined ##hplusroadmap06:45
maakuphm4242: there are very few things about the block chain which are trust-free06:46
chris_99nmz787, about?06:46
maakuit does achieve a dynamic, anonymous membership set signature. but that signature covers very little06:46
ebowdenpaperbot: http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/130702/ncomms3114/full/ncomms3114.html06:46
kanzureno way man anything i publish in a transaction is 100% true06:46
kanzurei can't even say it with a straight face :/06:47
maakuand its only what that signature covers, and implications from the validation logic, that you can say is trust-free06:48
justanotheruseranything i publish n a transaction is 100% true :|06:48
justanotheruserthere we go06:48
-!- strangewarp_ [~strangewa@c-76-25-206-3.hsd1.co.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]06:48
phm4242maaku: You mean you mean blockchain technology doesn't work?06:49
justanotheruserokay, I change my ban vote to yes06:49
kanzuregive me a reason to not ban you06:49
-!- mode/##hplusroadmap [+o kanzure] by ChanServ06:49
maakuphm4242: did you read what I said? it works perfectly fine for what it does. which is a lot less than a lot of people think, but sufficient to build an economy on06:50
phm4242maaku: So what do you mean by 'there are very few things about the block chain which are trust-free'?06:50
justanotheruserWhen I was much younger I thought everyone making a dumb statement was a troll, then I realized there were people so incapable of understanding a concept that they come off as trolls, and now I don't know what to believe06:50
-!- strangewarp [~strangewa@c-76-25-206-3.hsd1.co.comcast.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]06:51
@kanzurejustanotheruser: generally, i kick out anyone who is terrible at general reasoning06:51
justanotheruseroh wait06:51
@kanzurejustanotheruser: i don't have enough time to train people to not be idiots06:51
maakuanyways. pasky: so kanzure will rip me a new one for not having worked this out in detail, but I think you can represent current capability in a formal planning language06:51
justanotheruserI thought jaydugger was tastybuds this first part of the reading06:52
@kanzureand idiocy only slows us down06:52
justanotheruserwhat a twist06:52
@kanzureJayDugger is a long-time regular, practically ancient06:52
justanotheruser.. so phm4242 is jaydugger?06:52
@kanzureuh, no06:52
justanotheruserwat06:52
maakue.g. AFM depassivation like Zyvex and Moriarty are working on, more blunt AFM tooltip manipulation (which might be probabalistic), etc.06:52
justanotheruser08:56 < justanotheruser> wait is phm nmz or JayDugger06:53
justanotheruser08:56 < kanzure> er, it was JayDugger06:53
@kanzurethe one asking about inventory was JayDugger06:53
justanotheruserso this is tastybuds?06:53
@kanzurethat's a third person06:53
justanotheruserdamn, this is a complicated story06:54
@kanzuremaaku: hey at least you accurately represent my complaints06:55
justanotheruserso you wanted to ban jay, phm asked why, and now you want to ban him06:55
@kanzurei want to man pete4242 because he's an idiot06:55
@kanzure*ban06:55
justanotheruseryou can see how I thought they were the same person :P06:55
paskymaaku: i don't really know anything about nanotech06:56
maakupasky: what I need the watson-like tech for is when we apply the same AGI planner to biology06:56
-!- Zinglon [~Zinglon@ip565f6f48.direct-adsl.nl] has quit [Quit: www.byrdirc.com]06:56
maakubecause although ab-initio quantum simulators are good enough to do nanotech work, they don't scale up to protiens06:57
maakulet alone whole cell simulations06:57
-!- Zinglon [~Zinglon@ip565f6f48.direct-adsl.nl] has joined ##hplusroadmap06:57
maakuso i imagine that part of the research objective would have to be accomplished by a watson-like understanding of the existing literature06:57
-!- chris_99 [~chris_99@unaffiliated/chris-99/x-3062929] has quit [Quit: Ex-Chat]06:57
maakuof course if you have a nanofactory, bootstrapping additional capabilities should be a solved problem :P06:58
justanotheruser11:29 < kanzure> 2 is stupid. typical surface dweller attitude.06:58
justanotheruserIs rapture on the h+ roadmap?06:58
maakujustanotheruser: define "rapture"06:58
-!- eudoxia [~eudoxia@r167-56-30-216.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy] has joined ##hplusroadmap06:59
justanotherusermaaku: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3RHenh8vJ8#t=20607:00
@kanzure.title07:00
yoleauxBioshock Intro (720p) - YouTube07:00
@kanzureoh brother07:00
justanotheruserRapture seems like a place you would like07:01
justanotherusernot sure how easy it would be to make an underwater city though07:01
justanotheruserLOL, I love this 12:05 < kanzure> i hate you get the hell out07:04
eudoxiakanzure: you still haven't told me your plan to implement skdb07:05
eudoxiaevery second we don't write skdb code is 10^50 planets not colonized by FOSS KSRM probes07:05
-!- justanotheruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has quit [Quit: Reconnecting]07:11
-!- justanot1eruser [~Justan@unaffiliated/justanotheruser] has joined ##hplusroadmap07:12
-!- ivan` [~ivan@unaffiliated/ivan/x-000001] has quit [Quit: ERC Version 5.3 (IRC client for Emacs)]07:12
@kanzurei wonder how to convert that into anxiety units07:12
-!- ivan` [~ivan@192.241.198.49] has joined ##hplusroadmap07:13
-!- ivan` [~ivan@192.241.198.49] has quit [Changing host]07:13
-!- ivan` [~ivan@unaffiliated/ivan/x-000001] has joined ##hplusroadmap07:13
-!- drewbot_ [~cinch@ec2-54-226-96-126.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]07:16
-!- Merovoth [~Merovoth@gateway/tor-sasl/merovoth] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]07:17
-!- drewbot [~cinch@ec2-54-159-143-104.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has joined ##hplusroadmap07:20
@kanzurealso, it's in the recent logs07:26
maakuKSRM = Kim Stanley Robinson's Mars trilogy?07:28
maakupasky: so I came at AGI because of nanotech07:29
maakui was looking at how to make a nanofactory, and at some point realized it would take an ungodly number of engineering man-years to complete07:30
maakubut that's it -- it's basically *just* an engineering problem. every decent university lab has the necessary tools and material07:30
maakuso, make an artificial engineer and buy lots of commodity computing hardware to run it seemed a cheaper / faster option07:31
maakuusing the agi to accomplish other stuff afterwards is just gravy07:31
@kanzureksrm is "kinematic self-replicating machine"07:31
maakuah07:32
maakuwell the mars triloogy is excelent reading too :)07:32
-!- Merovoth [~Merovoth@gateway/tor-sasl/merovoth] has joined ##hplusroadmap07:37
AmbulatoryCortexI really wonder if drexlerian nanotech is actually possible, as opposed to to wet nanotech07:38
justanot1eruserAmbulatoryCortex: Probably is possible, but also inefficient07:41
-!- ivan` [~ivan@unaffiliated/ivan/x-000001] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]07:46
-!- xrr [~xrr@gprs-inet-183-27.elisa.ee] has quit [Quit: Leaving]07:50
maakuAmbulatoryCortex: absolutely possible. here's some VASP simulations: http://www.molecularassembler.com/Papers/MinToolset.pdf07:51
maakujustanot1eruser: inefficient?07:52
justanot1erusermaaku: I'm guessing natures design is better on the atomic scale than replicating our macro scale technologies07:53
maakujustanot1eruser: you'd need some insane justifications for that.07:55
maakubiology is horribly inefficient07:55
maakubiology is putting all the parts in a box, shaking it, and getting the final result07:55
@kanzurebiology works07:56
maakuit's a miracle that it works, and is orders of magnitude slower than physical limits07:56
justanot1erusermaaku: and then making that final result slightly different over time towards a local optimum07:56
eudoxiathe difference is humans optimize for clarity (eg drexler's differential gear) while biology has brutally optimized for raw performance07:56
@kanzurenot optimized for performance07:57
maakubiology is absolutely not optimized for performance07:57
justanot1eruserkanzure: no, but survival is often aligned with performance07:57
maakuno, it is not07:57
maakuit is aligned with redundancy07:57
maakuredundancy is counter to performance07:57
justanot1eruser?07:57
justanot1eruserI'm talking about survival of an individual organism, are you not?07:58
AmbulatoryCortexbacteria manage to reproduce plenty fast in ideal conditions07:58
@kanzuregeology has no reason to be optimized for performance07:58
justanot1eruserhow does geology enter here?07:58
AmbulatoryCortexguessing mistype07:59
@kanzurebiology is just a widely misunderstood subfield of geology07:59
AmbulatoryCortexlol07:59
@kanzuresome rocks got up and started walking around and shit07:59
justanot1eruseryeah08:00
justanot1eruseranyways, organisms that can quickly replicate and use little energy have high performance and can survive08:00
maakujustanot1eruser: so i'm in peurto rico, 4,000 mi from my references08:02
justanot1eruserlife gave us DNA which is probably the best tool for building nanoscale structures in the short term08:02
maakubut i believe nanosystems has calculations showing that most of the things biology does can be done 1,000x faster with precision machinery08:03
justanot1erusermaaku: That actually sounds reasonable. I did say evolution only brought us to a local optimum. anyways wetware will still probably be our first step to getting to mechanosynthesis08:04
maakuwhich is not surprising ... machines beat biology at macro scale stuff. i think the onus is on you to show biology would be more efficient at the small scale08:04
maakujustanot1eruser: people have said that, but no one has come up with a reasonable way to bridge from biology to drexlarian like nanotech08:04
justanot1erusermaaku: make really inefficient error prone mechanosynthesis with wetware is my guess08:05
@kanzurethat's not an actual proposal08:05
maakuwhereas there at least exists a roadmap for doing so from AFM microscopy08:05
maakuand, what kanzure said08:05
maakuon the other hand, we have demonstrated mechanosynthesis on gold and silicon surfaces08:06
justanot1eruserkanzure: no, it's a guess. I'm not sure we know enough about how we can manipulate DNA to know whether we can/how to create a useful structure08:06
@kanzurewell, there's dna origami, but you should look at proteins instead08:07
eudoxiais dna origami actually useful for anything08:07
maakueudoxia: scaffolding08:08
-!- Viper168 [~Viper@unaffiliated/viper168] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]08:08
-!- Viper168_ [~Viper@unaffiliated/viper168] has joined ##hplusroadmap08:08
maakujustanot1eruser: the problem is that DNA and proteins are all wobbly at the nano scale08:09
justanot1erusermaaku: I'm not sure AFMs are the correct path since they're addative and the useful structures will probably be unstable when created in that manner08:09
paskymaaku: ah! that's a pretty interesting take - but then again, do you need an agi to build a nanofactory in the first place? i think it's way easier to go about this by using more specialized means, i.e. decomposing the problem to organizing current knowledge, automatically creating structured databases from unstructured data, inference on top o fthe database...08:09
-!- Viper168_ is now known as Viper16808:09
justanot1eruserI should specify additive layer by layer08:09
maakujustanot1eruser: it's not unlike 3d printing, so long as you can come up with a way of removing material in a bath08:10
justanot1erusermaaku: what is the bath? Electrons?08:10
maakuit seems zyvex is doing that (additive silicon and germanium then remove the germanium in a path)08:10
maaku*bath08:10
@kanzurehttp://diyhpl.us/~bryan/papers2/nanotech/freitas_process/notes.txt08:10
maakubut yeah, the freitas process is not strictly additive08:10
maakupasky: "do you need an agi" absolutly not. give me either (a) 500 million dollars and 10 years, or (b) an AGI and a basement lab08:11
maakusince I think the agi would cost less than $500m+, that seemed the less resource intensive path08:12
justanot1erusermaaku: how much freedom does that process allow? Could I construct arbitrary molecules and wash the stuff I don't need?08:12
AmbulatoryCortexcourse, to make the AGI, you might need the former08:12
maakujustanot1eruser: i don't know, zyvex seems pretty tight lipped about what they're doing. you can read the outline of their proposal in the foresight nanotech roadmap though.08:12
maakuAmbulatoryCortex: 10 years, yes, the hundreds of millions, probably not08:13
paskymaaku: i think the agi will be more expensive than $500m still at this point, since you need a few more damn good ideas, and to get these, you need to spend resources to generate all sorts of bad and good ideas08:13
maakupasky: that's where i differ from mainstream opinion. to build the idiot savant capable of designing a nanofacotry, i think we have most of the good ideas already sorted out08:14
justanot1eruserwhy does the number $500 million keep getting tossed around in this channel? Is it just coincidence?08:16
@kanzurebudgets, man08:16
justanot1eruseris that the 2015 ##hplusroadmap budget?08:16
@kanzurewell the 2014 budget was just under $3 million08:16
justanot1eruserdo you have donors?08:17
maakuin this case $500m was a random number i came up with on the spot.08:17
justanot1eruserah08:17
@kanzurefuck donors08:18
maakufreitas and merkle quote $50m - $100m I think, but they're optimistic imho08:18
@kanzure1) do hard work 2) demand payment 3) i'll spend my money however i please08:18
justanot1eruserbecause the guy that almost got banned earlier was talking about a $500m island08:18
maakuwhereas an AGI could really be 1-2 people over ten years, so ~$1-2m08:18
-!- ebowden [~ebowden@CPE-144-131-35-125.lns4.dav.bigpond.net.au] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]08:19
maakuhttp://www.wisdomination.com/screw-motivation-what-you-need-is-discipline/08:20
maaku.title08:20
yoleauxScrew motivation, what you need is discipline. | Wisdomination08:20
@kanzurescrew discipline, what they need is meth or adderall08:22
@kanzurepossibly cocaine08:22
maakupasky: the "organize current data, structure databases, inference [and planning] on top" works for stuff we know a lot about, e.g. biology08:22
maakuhence why I think it's necessary for the SENS research task08:23
@kanzureyou can get pretty far manually doing that08:23
@kanzurehttp://diyhpl.us/~bryan/papers2/longevity/aging_roadmap.txt08:23
maakubut for nanofactories, the amount of info out there is basically nil08:23
@kanzure(this guy's thesis was that "everyone sucks and nobody reads the fucking literature, they just want expert systems to do the work for them eventually")08:23
maakumost of it is right here: http://www.molecularassembler.com/Nanofactory/Publications.htm08:23
maakuheh08:23
maakuyeah you could do all of this manually08:24
maakubut then you have Aubrey de Gray (sp?) asking for $100m to do just that08:24
maaku(also insanly optimistic, i think)08:24
@kanzureafaik aubrey doesn't read that much any more08:24
paskymaaku: i think i'd need to understand nanotech a lot more to be able to meaningfully discuss engineering it automatically :)08:26
maakufair enough. i'd have to say the same about biology to be honest08:26
maakubut i'd love a description of why you're working on agi and what tasks you want it to accomplish similarly08:27
paskyI wrote it once (I think even pasted in this channel) but it didn't really make that much sense I guess08:30
paskymaaku: http://pasky.or.cz/dev/brmson/grand-plan.pdf08:32
paskyre-reading it, i do think it makes sense but is way less concrete than i remembered writing it ;)08:32
maakuit made sense, and it is a workable plan08:38
maakuif i had to bootstrap agi, that's what I'd do08:38
maakuwhat i'm doing right now is bootstrapping via a different industry :P08:38
-!- eudoxia [~eudoxia@r167-56-30-216.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy] has quit [Quit: Leaving]08:39
maakui'm involved in a bitcoin startup, and if that has any kind of positive exit, i should be able to skip the compete-with-Google-and-IBM phase and jump straight to "build me a nanofactory"08:39
-!- DumpsterD1ver [~loki@vpn166.sdf.org] has quit [Quit: Leaving]08:39
maakubut that requires a 5+ year self-funded roadmap08:40
maakuif you want to make money now, knowledge organization is probably where it's at08:40
-!- DumpsterD1ver [~loki@vpn166.sdf.org] has joined ##hplusroadmap08:43
maakupasky: just be careful to structure it in such a way that you can sell the business to one of those heavyweights without losing the technology08:44
maakue.g. make the tech open source but the database proprietary or something08:44
maakuthis may require some careful thought08:44
-!- weles [~mariusz@wsip-174-78-132-9.ri.ri.cox.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]08:45
maakupasky: what's your background?08:45
maakun/m found your web page08:47
-!- dustinm` [~dustinm@192.241.142.243] has joined ##hplusroadmap08:47
paskymaaku: so far it's all open source, and I don't have the details of restricting something figured out yet; my working plan is to keep it open source until I'm sure I shouldn't08:49
maakuimho it should always be open source08:49
maakui assume this is your research project? any problems from your university if you spin it out?08:50
@kanzurepasky's background is the git underground08:50
@kanzureand stuff08:50
@kanzureactually i have no good way to summarize pasky08:51
maakui'll save a git vs monotone argument for another day08:51
-!- dustinm` [~dustinm@192.241.142.243] has quit [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]08:53
maaku"answering physics questions in university exams" -- do you have more info about this08:53
-!- eudoxia [~eudoxia@r167-56-30-216.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy] has joined ##hplusroadmap08:53
-!- erasei [erasei@x.kaw.cc] has quit [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]08:53
maaku? how smart is it? is it able to plug into models, or is it just searching for already worked out examples?08:53
-!- erasei [erasei@x.kaw.cc] has joined ##hplusroadmap08:54
-!- eudoxia [~eudoxia@r167-56-30-216.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy] has quit [Client Quit]08:55
maakuon the roadmap to a "build me a nanofactory", i'm going to build an agent that can figure out and solve problems in introductory physics and engineering books08:55
maakui'm trying to see if what you're doing is related08:55
-!- eleitl [~eugen@v8.ativel.com] has joined ##hplusroadmap08:57
@kanzureeleitl: hello. maaku and pasky have agi plans.08:57
@kanzureand eudoxia wants your autograph08:58
eleitl:)08:58
eleitlwho are maaku and pasky?08:58
@kanzuresome dudes08:59
eleitldudes with money and clue?08:59
phm4242Nope. Inane AGI speculation.08:59
-!- phm4242 was kicked from ##hplusroadmap by kanzure [phm4242]08:59
@kanzureignore that one08:59
@kanzurethey were here a moment ago...08:59
@kanzurehave you heard anything from zyvex in forever?09:00
eleitlNo. But I'm not keeping current.09:00
paskymaaku: should be no issues from my university :) i hope to be able to get some investment and spin it off in late spring / summer, i'll see how it goes09:00
paskyno idea how to really go about it yet :)09:00
eleitlpasky: what is your proposed bootstrap route?09:01
maakueleitl: i'm Mark Friedenbach, previously worked at Transcriptic and NASA's Astrobiology and Lunar Science institutes before that. Currenty co-founder at blockstream.com. Who are you?09:01
eleitlHi Mark. I'm Eugene Leitl. Early transhumanist of diverse interests, worked in cryonics.09:01
paskymaaku: regarding the physics questions - I just started to look around a week ago and so far it seems they are basically converting the physics problems to some logical forms with predicates and then spew out pattern-based Modelica statements based on these predicates, and running simulations; I don't really like the approach that much, but it's a difficult problem09:01
paskyeleitl: Hi Eugene. I'm Petr Baudis, random programmer and researcher, previously working e.g. on Computer Go and various machine learning stuff, currently working on https://github.com/brmson09:02
pasky...which is a question answering system.09:03
eleitlHi Petr. Pleased to meet you.09:03
paskyand I guess this gadget is my proposed bootstrap route to agi if you meant that :) but I'm not actually thinking about agi that hard since building a sensible QA system is hard enough right now.09:04
@kanzureeleitl: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRu02F6AOmg&t=40s09:04
-!- dustinm` [~dustinm@192.241.142.243] has joined ##hplusroadmap09:04
eleitlPick and place a la gatling. Nice.09:05
eleitlpasky: I think AGI is hard enough you have to go biologically inspired if not outright biologically derived. Which is computationally very expensive, obviously.09:06
eleitlAnother approach is ALife, but that requires even more computation.09:06
maakueleitl: nice to meet you. andytoshi has inspired me to stop cryoprocrastinating. if i have any questions about that stuff i might ask you09:06
@kanzureeleitl: i stumbled into this alife paper a while back.... http://diyhpl.us/~bryan/papers2/ai/The%20evolution%20of%20self-replicating%20computer%20organisms%20-%20A.%20N.%20Pargellis.pdf09:07
maakueleitl: you working in the AI space?09:07
maakueleitl: i'll differ with you on that one. biological intelligence is not optimized for being comprehensible09:08
eleitlmaaky: sure, I can tell you everything you like about cryonics. Unfortunately, probably none of it will be exactly great news.09:08
paskyeleitl: so I think that's an argument I had with kanzure back when I posted http://pasky.or.cz/dev/brmson/grand-plan.pdf first09:08
@kanzurei was not aware that eleitl agreed with me on biologically-accurate emulation09:09
@kanzurehowever, i always suspected that i was right09:09
maakulol09:09
eleitlmaaku: I've done my reading on AI since 1980s and had my debates in 1990s/2000s.09:09
paskyeleitl: I personally don't think AGI needs to be biologically inspired (or at least not to the gory details of simulating firing neurons etc.)09:09
eleitlWhat exactly do you mean when you say biologically accurate, kanzure?09:09
@kanzurei mean "read a bunch of papers, write good emulators"09:09
@kanzure*neuroscience papers09:09
@kanzure*neurophysiology papers09:09
eleitlI agree about that one.09:10
eleitlpasky: biological information processing is opaque, so they only chance you have is by going to low level physics, and see what you can learn from digitized neuranatomy09:10
paskyeleitl: same with alife, that is not even on my radar at all; that's in the field of the people who want to build a robot who will learn touch objects and understand basic relations like a human child, but I'm looking at AGI from a completely different perspective, I don't even think it needs to be embodied or particularly represented in the physical or any artifical world09:10
maakuif your goal is to create an artificial human with all its perks and flaws, yes biology-inspired is probably a good route09:10
eleitlSo, unfortunately, you will need the pesky spiking neurons, at least initially.09:11
paskyeleitl: but I don't want to build an artificial human brain09:11
paskythat's not a very interesting task for me09:11
eleitlpasky: information processing needs hardware, so of course it is embodied09:11
maakuif you just want to automate certain tasks, e.g. engineering, then i find bio-emulation pathways less convincing09:11
eleitlAutomation is easy, but real intelligence is not.09:11
eleitlSo I will remain politely skeptical of your effort, unless it involves the total connectome.09:12
@kanzurewellll09:12
paskyif we start throwing around phrases like "real intelligence", I don't think that's a particularly inspiring discussion for me09:12
@kanzurearguably the total connectome is not necessary09:12
maakui'll have to ask you to taboo "real intelligence" here and define what you mean09:12
@kanzurelike, auditory cortex is probably unnecessary09:12
@kanzureand some of the motor cortex can probably be dropped09:13
maakufor me the task i'm interested in is creative problem solving and model building09:13
eleitlI define real intelligence as ability of artificial system to occupy 50% of better of all human work niches09:13
@kanzurewhy not just human-like cognitive ability09:13
maakueleitl: right, ok. so we're talking about different things09:13
eleitlSo not just spikes in ability landscapes, but flooding the entire space09:13
@kanzure(or is that something you would ask to taboo as well?) (and if so, why)09:13
maakufor me AGI is an ability to solve problems in arbitrary, unexpected domains09:14
eleitlif it can't compete with people across the board is not really intelligence09:14
eleitlmaaku: that's what people do, yes09:14
maakueleitl: people do much more than that though09:14
maakuif my AGI is unable to express what it feels like to fall in love, i'm okay with that09:15
eleitlI have not been able to find a better benchmark than the 50% definition above.09:15
eleitlwhy should your AI be unable to learn what falling in love means?09:15
eleitlThere are people who have never fallen in love, so all they can do is read about that.09:15
@kanzurethis is going to escalate into the wrong conversation ("is it okay to not experience love but still understand it")09:16
maakueh... yeah i think kanzure is right09:16
maakuthis is not the place for that conversation09:16
eleitlI'm trying to use a definition of abilities people are being paid for09:16
eleitlAs a benchmark it's not all that bad, and measurable.09:17
maakuwhat I was trying to get at before was "for what reason do you want to make an AGI?"09:17
@kanzureeleitl: why does GRG suck so much?09:17
eleitlOld gerontologists can't evolve.09:17
@kanzurebut why not. is that going to happen to me?09:17
maakuif your task is "replace humans 50% of the time", then having a human-inspired intelligence is a good idea09:17
eleitlAn AGI is a tool to restart progress, which has been stalling.09:18
paskyeleitl: so how would you measure it? because it doesn't seem all that unlikely to me that machines today occupy 50% of better of all human work niches compared to 300 years ago09:18
eleitlAn AGI which is not useful is of no interest to me.09:18
maakuif your goal is "automate things humans find hard" -- what i'm doing -- then there's good reason to believe that human-inspired AGI is an inefficient path09:18
eleitlpasky: the number of employees hired.09:18
eleitlHuman intelligence is young, and if we have figured out the basics we can improve it reasonably quickly, if it does not require embodiment.09:19
paskyprogress has been stalling? I must be living in a different world!09:19
eleitlIf a path is sterile, it might be the most efficient one, but it's still irrelevant in practice.09:19
paskyI kind of like the definition "ability to solve problems in arbitrary, unexpected domains" right now09:19
eleitlThis is pretty much the textbook definition, but as a metric it's useless.09:20
eleitlBy looking at the job market for people vs. AI you're letting the whole world evaluate your systems. All you do is collecting statistics.09:20
eleitlBy 50% or better you're avoiding the asymptotic issues of 100%.09:21
@kanzureeh, maybe you cna extract some evolutionary pressure from job markets, but i dunno09:21
maakueleitl: it's very much a useful metric.09:22
maakui write a program that is able to answer physic and engineering questions when hooked up to a newtonian physics simulator09:22
eleitlmaaku: what is your measurement procedure for intelligence?09:22
eleitlMine is job statistics. Easy as pi.09:22
maakuwhen it's able to do that, try it on chemistry questions when hooked up to a density-functional simulator09:22
maakuthen ask it to build nanomachines09:22
eleitlmaaku: DFT is probably not the right tool, but you're exactly right09:23
maakueleitl: does it get the job done.09:23
maakui don't think that kind of measurement is useful or interesting09:23
maakui'm working on AGI to solve a problem. solving that problem is interesting09:23
eleitlI happen to disagree. The history of AI tends to be full of empty grandiosity. I prefer results.09:24
maakueleitl: DFT is not the right tool for which part?09:24
@kanzuremaaku: it's a little unfair for you to bring up newtonian physics simulators after our previous conversations. i mean, at least address the original objections....09:25
eleitlAre you trying to do um or pm? I happen to think that the chemistry part is boring. So you need to simulate ~ms of ~um^3.09:25
maakukanzure: i'm blanking on the specific critique you are talking about09:25
@kanzure"making a perfect simulator is also an impossible task"09:26
eleitlI don't really understand what maaku's point is.09:26
@kanzure"machine learning tends to be optimized for the simulation you write"09:26
eleitlWho cares about anything perfect?09:26
maakuin this case i'm talking about a trainign set -- given a newtonian physics simulator, learn the model that makes that simulator work and use it to answer questions from a textbook on newtonian physics09:26
@kanzuremachine learning will exploit the fuzzyness in the simulator09:26
@kanzurethat is why you would care09:26
paskyeleitl: your metric maybe makes sense (if you can measure it; I have the trouble with the "Better 50%", I don't know how to define that), but it says "have we got agi yet, for a wihle now?"09:26
eleitl50% or more of all job slots occupied by nonhumans.09:27
paskythat seems like kinda silly question to me, I'd like to ask "how I just built an agi?" or even "okay, what remains to be done to build an agi?" your metric doesn't help me with that09:27
eleitl*All* job slots. CEO, gardener, physician, nanotechnologist.09:27
eleitlActually, your AGI would be capable of starting to fill up the slots -- all of them -- if it's good enough.09:28
eleitlBefore, you're limited to simulations.09:28
eleitlThat tells you something, see ALife progress.09:28
paskyeleitl: oh like that! I didn't even realize you mean it this way; the notion that AGI would hold "jobs" seems most extraordinary to me09:28
maakukanzure: right well this is why we run the tests on newtonian physics -- I'm sure that the AGI will early on find edge cases in the simulator and abuse them09:28
maakubut it's easier to tell when that happens09:28
eleitlpasky: yes, definitely, artificial systems are already competing on the job market, but only in isolated areas09:29
eleitlA real general intelligence would be able to do any job, orelse it wouldn't be actually general09:29
maakuvs when you ask it to design a nanofactory and it comes up with something weird. maybe the thing it found is real? maybe not? we don't know09:29
maakueleitl: no, artificial systems pretty much run our world today09:30
eleitlIf it does the job it doesn't matter how weird it is09:30
paskyeleitl: but the robots in car factories definitely are replacing human jobs; but they don't hold jobs themselves - and they create other human jobs for robot maintenance; I would by default assume it'll be the same way with AGI09:30
maakufrom air traffic control to distribution networks to architectural design to layout of supermarkets, etc.09:30
paskyjust as regular computers and their databases replaced huge swathes of low-paid office workers since the 50s09:30
paskyor there used to be an actual job of being a "computer", that is carrying out arithmetic calculations09:30
eleitlPrecisely my point: you can already compute a human equivalence index by looking at the job market.09:31
eleitlBut you'll notice glaring absence of machines in certain wide areas of it.09:31
eleitlThat's because our current systems are idiot savants.09:31
maakui don't know how you would -- exactly how many people would it take to manually do what a narrow AI system does today? unclear because capabilities differ09:31
paskybut what do I learn from the job market? okay it has this structure now, it had that structure in 1915; many jobs popped up, many disappeared, some because of machines, some for different reason09:31
paskyhow do I derive your metric from that?09:31
maakubut i think it's arguing a point i find uninteresting09:32
eleitlI find it interesting what you find unininteresting.09:32
@kanzureeleitl: i think GRG has no good plans09:33
paskyI wonder if we have less prostitues because of all the porn on the internet09:33
@kanzureeleitl: someone needs to sit down and write useful plans for $10M, $100M, $10B in funding for our various mutual problem areas09:34
maakukanzure: that would be useful, although probably a rabbit hole of disagreement09:34
@kanzurethat's fine actually09:34
@kanzurehaving separate disagreeing plans is fine09:34
maakusince most of us compute that based on gut feeling, not actual costed plans09:34
@kanzurehaving them at all is useful09:34
eleitlI agree GRG is not making progress09:34
maakuGRG?09:34
@kanzurethey proposed a weekly conference call -_-09:34
@kanzure.wik http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerontology_Research_Group09:35
yoleaux"The Gerontology Research Group (GRG) is a global group of researchers in various fields that is known for verifying and tracking supercentenarians, or people who are at least 110 years old. The group also aims to further gerontology research with a goal of reversing or slowing aging. It was founded in 1990 by L. Stephen Coles and Stephen M." — http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerontology_Research_Group09:35
eleitlGerontologists are conservative, and they don't learn from the dead gerontologists.09:35
eleitlhttp://chronopause.com/chronopause.com/index.php/2011/05/30/going-going-gone/09:36
eleitlFew people remember who these even were.09:36
@kanzurebunch of dead people09:36
eleitlRight. That so many with high hopes died should send the other ones a message.09:36
@kanzureyou mean high hopes is insufficient? whaaaat09:37
eleitlYet they still continue to believe they're the ones who're going to make the breakthrough.09:37
eleitlBut there isn't any breakthrough to make as far as I can tell. It's an issue of control.09:37
@kanzurebodies are dumb anyway09:37
maakui'm sorry i have a mental filter regarding most ageing research09:37
eleitlmaaku: it's wise of you. I still track it on a low priority, should something interesting emerge.09:38
eleitlin 30 years, nothing interesting has.09:38
@kanzureemulation seems like a more viable option09:38
maakusome people were god damn lucky in the gene lottery, and others probably extended it a few years or decades through good habits09:38
@kanzureand also has the benefit of fixing most of the aging problems09:38
eleitleven if you're lucky, it buys you perhaps 20-30 years.09:39
eleitlNot bad, but not game-changers.09:39
maakubut it seems unlikely to yield a better payoff than "exercise, eat right, and don't smoke"09:39
maakuanyway i only need to live 30-ish more years...09:39
@kanzure"store your wisdom teeth" is some fall-out and good advice09:39
eleitlI'm popping dozens of pills, but I'm making no illusions about their effect on longevity.09:40
eleitlIt keeps my vitals in decent shape, though.09:40
@kanzurenah vitamins are just a scam09:40
maakueleitl: however i do realize that being an 80's baby i'm fortunate to have the luxury to ignore it though09:41
eleitl"I only need to live 30-ish more years" -- that's so many were saying in 1980s and 1990s.09:41
eleitlQuite a few of them are dead now.09:41
eleitlmaaku: you're not different from people who were born last century09:41
@kanzureeleitl: does it make you feel better that you outlived them09:41
@kanzureeleitl: because it should09:41
maakueleitl: the world i live in is09:41
eleitldon't fool yourself, you're the easiest person to fool09:41
@kanzure"this time it's different"09:42
eleitlthere is no point in feeling good outliving the old and diseased09:42
maakueleitl: the last generation (sorry) made a mistake that is the variant of the planning fallacy09:42
@kanzure.to fenn http://parts.io/09:42
yoleauxkanzure: I'll pass your message to fenn.09:42
maakuwe/they could see that radical life extension was possible09:42
eleitlthey're poor bastards, and we're poor bastards, too09:42
@kanzurespeak for yourself09:42
maakuas humans we estimate things that seem crazy hard as 30 years away. it's just our nature09:43
eleitlmaaku: my model of the future is that it is worse than the past09:43
eleitlUnlike what many think technical progress has stalled across the board.09:43
paskyah, and that again :)09:43
paskygee09:43
eleitlWe're still making progress in some select areas, but that is dependant on a number of external factors that are not going in a good direction.09:44
eleitlExponentials are not the norm, and they never last long.09:44
@kanzureyeah he's sort of the eternally optimistic pessimist09:44
eleitlI'm an optimist because I believe it's all would have been completely avoidable09:45
maakuon the other hand, now we actually have technical pathways to achieving it, or at least the Kurzweilian graphs which show it happening in 30-ish years09:45
maakueleitl: I have absolutely no way to relate to that09:45
@kanzurekurzweil is my bitch09:45
eleitlmaaku: Kurzweil is a kook09:45
maakueleitl: wat.. i just.. wwhat? explonential progress is the only truly universal fact of human history09:46
maakuit has always held true in every culture in every era09:46
maakuat some point it will stop. it must as we hit physical limits. but there's still plenty of room at the bottom...09:47
maaku(well it won't stop, it's just we'll start the exponential expansion outward into space)09:47
eleitlExponentials don't last long, and be it for relativistic limits.09:48
eleitlUntil you can pop off recursive spacetimes with traversable portals.09:48
maakuok true. at some point we simply become quadratic as we expand outwards in all direcctions.09:48
* pasky became convinced, hmm, 12 minutes ago that this discussion is a waste of time09:48
maakubut it doesn't *stop*09:48
paskymaaku: I know, someone is wrong on the internet! but...09:48
eleitlmaaku: I know many people who think like you. These people should take the time analyzing the physical layer issues. They might learn something in the process.09:49
eleitlpasky is exactly right09:49
eleitlI'm not debating, just going through the notions09:49
paskythat was probably my biggest mistaken assumption :)09:49
eleitlI've had such debates in the last 30 years, and I'm tired of them.09:50
* maaku is wasting time while he waits for somebody09:50
paskyoh, still? wow09:50
maakueleitl: then what are you doing here?09:50
paskyeleitl: you should've said that before :)09:50
eleitlThey never convince anyone.09:50
maakui can't imagine a point of view more counter to ##hplusroadmap09:50
@kanzurehe is here because this is unfortunately the only place that has any ambition or skill or money09:50
maakuwe have money?09:51
@kanzureand also because i kick out all the fucktards09:51
eleitlkanzure is unfortunately correct09:51
maaku:P09:51
eleitlit is easy to get money if your ideas sound right09:51
@kanzure(or you, you know, have an actual income)09:51
@kanzure(or uh, ahem, inheritance)09:52
eleitlAGI still makes a good pitch to the right kind of people09:52
eleitlI would milk the time while it lasts09:52
@kanzureeleitl: i think the emulation pitch is pretty strong right now09:53
@kanzurebut it also sounds synonymous with hard work, so i can see why some would prefer to avoid it09:53
eleitlit unfortunately takes a lot more money that that kind of funding can raise09:53
@kanzuremarkham got a billion eurobucks09:54
maakuit's finally, finally back in vogue09:54
@kanzureuh, markram09:54
@kanzurewow i got his name wrong. that doesn't happen often.09:54
maakubut i'm not sure i'm so optimistic09:54
eleitlYeah, and produced a major eclat in the process.09:54
maakubitcoin seems a better path to money at the moment09:54
eleitlAnd one billion in connectomics is chump change.09:55
eleitlRemember exascale isn't even here yet, and it will be delayed09:55
@kanzureeclat?09:55
eleitlHe might well burn all the money, and then have very little to show for it.09:56
eleitlBrouhaha. The neuroscientists think theirs is a zero sum budget.09:56
maakupasky: this is why no matter what you make sure your project stays open source09:56
maakufind some other way to ensure competative advantage despite your tech being open source09:56
eleitlThey think they should have gotten part of Markram's money.09:56
eleitlmaaku: what kind of hardware are you currently using?09:57
maakuthat way if/when you exit or go under, the tech stays usable and not trapped09:57
@kanzureeleitl: markram is a neuroscientist, though09:58
eleitlOpen source is a given, but if you take money from venture capitalists, there are plenty of strings attached09:58
@kanzureeleitl: yeah i did see lots of people complaining that they weren't given a chunk09:58
@kanzureopen source strategy is too subtle for most people to explain09:58
eleitlYes, but the rest of them don't believe he is truly one of them. And they want a share of the pie.09:58
@kanzuretrezor recently rewrote their git commit history because they didn't understand what their open source licensing was useful for09:58
paskywhat kind of strings?09:58
eleitlcontrol of IP09:58
@kanzurewait why don't they think markram is a neuroscientist?09:59
paskykanzure: it was a PR stunt, more or less, they reverted it09:59
maakueleitl: for AGI? i'm still at the fooling-around-on-my-laptop stage09:59
@kanzurepasky: is it possible that they are idiots?09:59
maakuactually more of fooling-around-on-the-whiteboard09:59
eleitlmaaku: would you scale to millions and billions of nodes?09:59
maakuit's a hobby project, i do bitcoin at my dayjob (and being co-founder, it consumes more than 40hrs a week)09:59
@kanzure40 hours + 1 soul09:59
@kanzure+ 1 marriage10:00
maakuheh, yeah10:00
maakuthat describes it well10:00
maakuwe actually have a 40hr work culture10:00
paskykanzure: I know them personally and at least stickac has plenty of open source experience; it seems it's complicated and they are in a kinda tough spot and some of them indeed panicked10:00
maakubut being a co-owner really throws that out the window10:00
@kanzurepasky: right.... i have enough problems trying to explain an open source strategy to nmz787 for example. i can't imagine working with more than one person that doesn't understand open source.10:00
eleitlmaaku: are you at a bank, or an exchange?10:00
maakueleitl: bitcoin core tech company10:01
maakuhttp://blockstream.com/about/10:01
maakueleitl: i think millions let alone billions is overkill, although it could scale10:01
@kanzureand me: https://ledgerx.com/about-the-team/10:01
maakuoh yeah kanzure is in the bitcoin-riches-plz camp too :)10:02
maakui'm imagining 10k to 100k nodes for the applications i'm considering10:02
maakuso, a small datacenter10:02
@kanzuretechnically i am in the compliance game10:02
eleitlOh, you've got Adam Back.10:02
@kanzureyes they are serious10:02
pasky(fwiw, i tried to jump the bitcoin bandwagon once but now i think it's crazy to bet much money on it and it's likely to stay a niche for quite a long while now)10:02
maakuand Greg Maxwell and Pieter Wuille ;)10:03
eleitlmaaku: do you do asynchronous shared-nothing message-passing?10:03
-!- chris_99 [~chris_99@unaffiliated/chris-99/x-3062929] has joined ##hplusroadmap10:03
maakuwe're considering it but not doing anything with it at this time10:03
maakuthere are some useful protocols that would benefit from that capability10:03
@kanzure.g site:blockstream.com filetype:pdf sidechains10:04
yoleauxhttp://www.blockstream.com/sidechains.pdf10:04
eleitlif you want to do AGI on a sea of nodes, you need to do that. Nothing else will scale.10:04
eleitlI haven't been reading bitcoin-dev@ in a while.10:04
@kanzureeleitl: opinion on mixmaster or mixminion or anonymous remailers?10:06
maakuoh you mean in the AGI design? i haven't 'been considering any secure message passing architectures10:07
maakui'm assuming it's all in one data center with physical security10:07
maakuwell.. sort-of. i also have a nuclear option downloadable client that uses a bitcoin-derived p2p layer for connecting nodes10:07
eleitlmaaku: I'm talking about supercomputer architectures, where message passing has zero security10:08
eleitlyou might believe you don't need that much crunch, but you'll need that much crunch10:09
maakuit would be crazy irresponsible to deploy, but could work if hooked up to a dead-mans switch as a protection against harassment by crazy LW people10:09
maakueleitl: oh given we were talking about bitcoin i thought you meant bitmessage or mixmaster like systems :)10:09
eleitlresidential WAN latency and throughput are really not relevant to large scale minds, unless the nodes are very fat indeed. And they aren't.10:09
maakuyeah obviously some sort of message passing system would be used, but until operational I don't have reason to believe that OpenMPI based stuff would be insuffient..10:10
eleitlyou can't have shared memory, and you have to take care of the data/code logistics10:11
eleitlthink 3d torus, and map your stuff there10:11
eleitlif you're doing SMP work it doesn't really scale beyond 10^3 nodes tops10:12
eleitla good testbed would be developing on a Xeon Phi10:14
eleitlolder Xeon Phi are a dize a dozen10:14
eleitls/dize/dime10:14
maakuthe architecture i'm considering would be message passing10:15
maakuand resiliant to noisy/lost messages10:15
eleitlthat would be remarkably fitting10:15
eleitladd to it small-world network assumption, and you will go places10:16
eleitl(torus is small-world)10:16
eleitlallright, I need to run off to spend time with the family10:16
eleitly'all take care10:16
-!- eleitl [~eugen@v8.ativel.com] has quit [Quit: leaving]10:17
maakuthanks for the advise eleitl10:17
maakuoh he left10:17
-!- FourFire [FourFire@2a02:270:2015:cafe:c148:1a38:1e7e:49f3] has joined ##hplusroadmap10:20
-!- eudoxia [~eudoxia@r167-56-30-216.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy] has joined ##hplusroadmap10:24
eudoxiaoh no, i missed the leitl10:26
maakueudoxia: eleitl is seemingly well respected here?10:32
eudoxiawell you'd expect that to be the case given this is actually his fan club10:32
maaku?10:32
@kanzurethis is the official eugen leitl fan club10:33
@kanzurethe internet's first and only10:33
@kanzure(our meetings are every tuesday at midnight)10:33
maakui had seriously never heard of him before10:35
@kanzurethere are not that many transhumanists out there, you know10:36
@kanzureeudoxia: best to use .to or .tell i suppose10:37
-!- mode/##hplusroadmap [-o kanzure] by kanzure10:39
maakuwhat has he done that is deserving of fandom? (just curious)10:41
kanzurelately, cryonics, but also he's been known to put up great defenses against retard transhumanists over email10:42
kanzurehttp://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/2008-August/044716.html10:43
AmbulatoryCortexI understand some of those words, kanzure!10:46
AmbulatoryCortexprogress!10:46
maakuhis anti-progress views are strange10:47
maakui couldn't tell if he was trolling me or not10:48
eudoxiahe is a peak-oilist10:48
kanzurelike i said, he's optimist-pessimist10:48
kanzurehe doesn't believe there's been *no* progress10:48
eudoxiain one of his reddit posts he summarized his views as, basically: there's ongoing progress but also ongoing environmental destruction etc., we'll have to see which trend beats the other10:49
kanzuremeh10:49
kanzurei have never cared for that particular subset of his views :p10:50
kanzureanyway, he's not afraid of doing work so that is a useful property of ihm as well10:50
-!- delinquentme [~delinquen@162-245-22-166.v250d.PUBLIC.monkeybrains.net] has joined ##hplusroadmap10:50
kanzurewhereas i spent a lot of time trying to shame the world transhumanist association into doing transhumanist tech projects, which did not go well at all10:50
eudoxiai don't think i've heard that particular story10:51
maakuenvironmental destruction arguments are nonsense -- and i say this as an enviralmentalist10:51
FourFirekanzure, best to be friendly with the few transhumanists you happen upon then, right?10:52
kanzureno10:52
kanzurebest to kick them out and murder them10:52
FourFirewhy not?10:52
FourFirewhy so?10:52
kanzurebecause they are a waste of my time and resources10:52
maaku"environmental destruction" means changing the environment in ways that we don't value, but it's a logical fallacy to jump to that destroying human intelligence & progress10:52
kanzureand they are completely ineffective10:52
FourFireand you are?10:52
kanzurein the 200 years of their ideation never has one of them actually decided to learn some biology10:52
kanzureyes i have a demonstrated track record of writing good code, at least10:52
FourFiresrs?10:52
maakuFourFire: the extropian community has been less than worthless with respect to achieving their goals10:53
kanzuresitting around watching the stock market for the singularity is not a good plan of action10:53
FourFireI had no idea, I thought you were just acting arseholish for no particular reason besides personality deficits10:53
maakuwith some notable exceptions -- freitas and merkle being my favorites10:53
kanzurego fuck yourself10:53
kanzureargh what is wrong with you people10:53
kanzurewhat do you think this channel is for10:53
FourFiremaaku, well you can't have negative progress, unless you mean PR wise10:53
FourFirebut sure10:53
kanzurei am an asshole towards you because you don't do anything10:54
maakuFourFire: sure you can. you can convince other people that "sitting aroun watching the stock market for the singularity" is all they need to do10:54
kanzureand also because your ideas are often bad10:54
maakuthanks, Kurzweil10:54
FourFirekanzure, sharing progress, maybe encouraging eachother, not being arseholes at anyone who is genuinely interested10:54
kanzurei am not going to encourage you. you have only produced crap, in the past.10:54
maakuwe need people saying "YOU ARE GOING TO DIE UNLESS YOU HUNKER DOWN AND GET TO WORK!"10:55
FourFireI was unaware that I've actually produced anything, have I claimed to in the past?10:55
maakunot, "sign up for cryonics and you'll be ok!"10:55
FourFiremaaku, yeah, I should do that to myself10:55
kanzureyou have certainly brought up lots of stuff in here that has been less than stellar10:55
kanzureand also, your lack of production and work is also a good explanation of my dislike of you10:55
kanzureso that's good news10:55
kanzureat least i'm consistent10:55
maakui don't care about past performance as long as you are willing to make an effort now10:56
maaku(also I don't know what FourFire has worked on, so can't judge)10:57
kanzurehe has worked on bringing lesswrong crap in here10:57
kanzureactually i'm pretty upset that he just interprets all of my comments to him as a personality defecit. instead of, you know, reading what i'm saying. really? there's no other conceivable reason for my intense anger at your poor reasoning skills?10:59
kanzuremaybe how you ignore my explanations about what this channel is for? nah that's impossible, right?10:59
FourFireas far as I'm concerned and recall I haven't stated what I've worked on in here before, though sure, me presenting ideas which aren't 100% constructive could seem like a dick move to someone who has spent time building an optimal environment fro collaboration, but I don't consider that to be the case10:59
maakuthen FourFire, step one is apply your now mastered rationality skills to seeing if any of those unconventional lesswrong ideas actually make sense (hint: many of them don't)11:00
FourFirethe majority of my interest in LW and the surrounding community has been in improving my personal effectiveness towards the goals I see fit, and indeed more accurately determining what those goals are11:00
maakuwhat has disgusted me about transhumanism is that people get the message: "steps to immortality: (1) sign up for cryonics, (2) sit back and chat while watching those smooth exponentials, (3) there is no step three, but enjoy the singularity!"11:00
kanzurethat's certainly digusting11:01
kanzureer.... disgusting..11:01
FourFireok, well cryonics for one has always been a last resort thing ever since I found out about it, I consider it to be 99.5% as bad as dying in any other way11:01
FourFirebut then I have similar reservations about uploading11:02
kanzurealthough, to be fair, i would argue that the majority of transhumanists do not sign up for cryonics by default11:02
kanzurewhich is perhaps even worse11:02
maaku(FourFire: I post on LW too by the way, though I get low karma for being counter-culutural there)11:02
FourFirekanzure, wat, how can you have it both ways?11:02
kanzurehaha maau is counter-cultural?11:02
kanzureFourFire: if doing nothing is bad, then doing cryonics is only slightly better11:02
AmbulatoryCortexcyronics still shreds your cells, unless there's been some development I'm not aware of recently11:02
kanzure*haha maaku is counter-cultural?11:02
FourFiremaaku, I posted a little but not anything of consequence11:03
FourFireAmbulatoryCortex, much better than your atoms being all over the place11:03
kanzureit's stupid that transhumanism is actually counter-cultural there. they don't know their own skin from the walls.11:03
FourFireat least with cryonics they're sorta in the same positions that they were when you were alive11:03
FourFireok, fine, here is an idea by a quantum physicist I know for making cheap, dense flash memory: http://memory.oyhus.no/11:04
FourFireif someone here can get it made then I consider that progress!11:05
maakukanzure: i'm not sure transhumanism is counter-cultural there. they're mostly pro-cryonics, pro-life extension, etc.11:05
FourFireI'm shortly going to purchase the OpenBCI kit and donate it to the hackerspace I participate in11:06
kanzurejust not pro-doing-anything11:06
AmbulatoryCortexI think cryonics is a false hope11:06
kanzureit's not a hope. it's just a better alternative to cremation.11:06
eudoxiamaaku: i think kanzure meant they're kurzweilian transhumanists rather than roll up the sleeves and pump glycol into a cadaver transhumanists11:06
maakuAmbulatoryCortex: cryonics is better than the alternative, that's all11:06
maakueudoxia: oh they're worse than that. if you actually roll up your sleeves and work on this, you're murdering humanity!11:07
FourFireduring my free time I will do some biofeedback experiments and afterwards attempt to make a collab team to program a Brain Computer Interface software11:07
maakuseriously i've gotten death threats on #lesswrong (which is why i'm no longer there)11:07
kanzureneat11:07
FourFirewhat??11:07
AmbulatoryCortexnice11:07
FourFireby who?11:07
eudoxiathat's got to be some kind of achievement11:07
kanzuremaaku: well according to the etc group, i'm a bioterrorist and according to eliezer i'm going to blow up the planet (because transhumanists/ai are bad, dawg)11:07
eudoxia'told to stop working on AI by a brony on #lesswrong'11:07
FourFireyeah, I mean I've said all manner of off things in there11:07
FourFirethe worst I've gotten is temp bans for "time travelling"11:08
maakui didn't recognize or remember the nick, although i'm sure I cound find it in the logs. probably some kid11:08
kanzuremight have been me11:08
maakuwasn't you11:09
kanzure:(11:09
maakubut yeah, i wasn't joking earlier about the dead-mans switch to release a UFAI11:09
kanzurehm?11:09
maakuand it's fucked up that this should even be an issue11:09
eudoxiawait who has a UFAI on a dead man's switch11:10
eudoxiaan* UFAI11:10
maakukanzure: genetic search + reinforcement learner + programmable goals + "mind transmission" communication, wrapped up with the bitcoin p2p protocol for peer discovery and relay11:10
kanzureno i mean11:10
kanzurewhat do you mean by you weren't joking?11:10
FourFirekanzure, I'm afraid you'll have to remind me on "my explanations about what this channel is for?" then I could tell you whether I've just completely misinterpreted or ignored them11:10
kanzureFourFire: you just claimed you thought this channel was for my outbursts, you dork11:10
-!- strangewarp [~strangewa@c-76-25-206-3.hsd1.co.comcast.net] has joined ##hplusroadmap11:11
maakueudoxia: I don't yet, but I will.11:11
kanzuremaaku: i think that the claim that singinst can prevent ufai is silly and should never be trusted11:12
maakukanzure: +1 on that11:12
kanzureand even if they were capable of that, then we s[huld prevent them from achieving control of the planet11:12
kanzurebtw fenn has been living with them for a few weeks now11:12
FourFirehehe, it's been a long time since someone called me a dork, do we still use that word these days?11:12
FourFireI'm fully aware that there's some massive communication problem between the two of us, but I remain unconvinced that it is solely due to me being stupid11:13
maakuyay we got an inside mole!11:14
AmbulatoryCortexeh?11:14
maakui'm actually not too worried about the siginst people, but rather their crazy, literally insane followers11:15
maakugoertzel has apparantly been receiving death threats too11:15
kanzuremaaku: are you in california? when you're not in puerto rico?11:15
maakuyeah11:15
maakuSan Jose11:15
kanzureyou should meet feen11:15
kanzurefenn11:15
maakui'd like to11:15
kanzureand tell him to bring steve11:16
FourFire"you just claimed you thought this channel was for my outbursts, you dork" kanzure I admit that I can't see where I did that, care, to quote it back to me?11:16
kanzurewtf?11:16
maakuwho is steve?11:16
kanzure10:53 < FourFire> I had no idea, I thought you were just acting arseholish for no particular reason besides personality deficits11:16
kanzureFourFire: you don't seem to be capable of carrying a conversation....11:16
FourFireyes, ok in retrospect that was a stupid comment11:16
kanzuremaaku: steve is the only reason singinst has an ounce of legitimacy11:17
-!- Viper168 [~Viper@unaffiliated/viper168] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]11:17
maakui would have put nate/so8res as that reason11:17
maaku(i've been trying to pull him away from MIRI craziness, unsuccessfully)11:17
FourFireI know that you consider me your intellectual inferior, or perhaps just unfortunately undereducated, but I don't understand why that uatomatically translates into you being a verbal dick to me, however I'm glad we have this dialogue going now, so don't get offended now.11:17
kanzures08res not found11:17
maakuFourFire: kanzure is a dick to everyone11:18
maakuhttp://lesswrong.com/user/So8res/11:18
FourFireI genuinely want to find out what ticks you off so much about me, and fix it if it's not too hard11:18
kanzuremaaku: http://lesswrong.com/user/Steve_Rayhawk/overview/11:19
maakuFourFire: good. as far as I can tell that's why he's a dick. if you take at as indication to learn more about yourself, you're the right type of person. if not, you disappear and that is also good11:19
FourFirethanks for that maaku11:21
eudoxianot true, i haven't disappeared and all i've done is write a commit for skdb once11:22
FourFirethe potential benefit from attaining the cooperation of people who are insufficient in personality to get around kanzure's personality are not worth the time for the benefit they will give, which answers my first question today11:22
kanzurebecause i have never seen you do anything but misunderstand11:23
kanzurewhich makes investment in you totally worthless11:23
kanzurealso reddit. that's not a good sign either.11:23
maakuFourFire: right, I think11:24
kanzure*and* lesswrong, geeze11:24
kanzureeudoxia: you are bad at hiding the other piles of code you write11:24
eudoxiakanzure: haha, yes, but a lisp ORM isn't going to invent molecular machines ;C11:24
FourFireoh yeah I wanted to write up some detailed things in the diyhpl.us/wiki filling in some bits which are marked "will fill in later" "obvious stuff"11:25
kanzurestranger claims about lisp have been made, i suppose11:25
-!- Viper168 [~Viper@unaffiliated/viper168] has joined ##hplusroadmap11:25
kanzuremaaku: steve is basically the singinst version of gmaxwell11:26
FourFirekanzure, TBH most of the time I spend on reddit goes towards raising the, what LW would call "sanity waterline" but what is more correctly termed "effective altruist-transhumanist culture" in the futurology subreddit11:26
eudoxiathat's probably a waste of time11:27
FourFireoh and evening out the collapse and darkfuturology commenters which are too pessimistic, yeah it probably is11:27
eudoxiakanzure: here's a funny coincidence, though, there's a chemist who attended a foresight conference and built a common lisp compiler on LLVM to run massively distributed computational chemistry stuff11:28
FourFireI guess I'll continue my previous strategy, and report when I've actually done something i consider valuable: if I do manage to make the BCI work, I'll open source it11:28
eudoxiamaybe i can convince him to, idk, run an ab-initio simulation of all those impossible gears11:28
kanzureer, why?11:29
kanzureconvince him to clean up nanoengineer :p11:29
eudoxiakanzure: he spent two years writing a compiler so he wouldn't have to touch C++ anymore11:29
kanzureFourFire: i don't think you are going to find eeg useful11:31
FourFirekanzure, thanks for the tip, what makes you say that?11:33
-!- Vutral [~ss@mirbsd/special/Vutral] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]11:33
kanzuredecades of disappointment11:33
-!- Vutral_ [~ss@p5B2A49CB.dip0.t-ipconnect.de] has joined ##hplusroadmap11:33
FourFireI'm buying it for the hackerspace, and though it's not necessarily useful for transhumanist agenda, I'm sure someone here will do something cool with it even if it's insufficient for my needs11:34
FourFirewould you suggest something else i could spend 800 USD on then?11:34
eudoxiainb4 molecular biology textbooks11:35
eudoxiathen again we have libgen for that11:35
kanzurehopefully you guys would burn me at the stake if i suggested paying for textbooks11:35
-!- narwh4l [~michael@unaffiliated/thesnark] has joined ##hplusroadmap11:37
kanzureyo narwh4l11:38
narwh4lhey kanzure11:38
FourFireeudoxia, I can just borrow them from the university library anyway11:40
FourFireI got a recentish copy of Molecular Biology of The Cell but have been too busy to read through metabolism :/11:41
-!- narwh4l [~michael@unaffiliated/thesnark] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]11:42
delinquentmeim . really . fucking . happy .11:48
delinquentmekanzure, nmz787 thanks for the halp ... instrument response time is perceivably instant11:49
kanzuregot a paycheck?11:49
delinquentmethat too !11:49
delinquentmeim not dirty fucking poor hahah11:49
kanzuregood times11:49
FourFireSo, kanzure what would you advise me in regards to studying Biology at a University, is it: A waste of time and you don't care || B not worth it but you'd tell me to anyway since I'm useless to you || C Worth it and you'd recommend it because it would help me help you || D I could make better use of my time reading textbooks and programming (or whatever you do) ?11:50
kanzuredo you have money?11:50
FourFireI live in a country where it's free to attend11:50
FourFirebut no.11:51
kanzuredo you live in the united states?11:51
delinquentmeFourFire, my .02 : if you think you can make it through the typically boring a fucking curriculum and still love it ... do it11:52
delinquentmeI dont think its a stretch to say college lecture classes / testing structure are where creativity goes to die.11:52
FourFirekanzure, Norway11:53
FourFiredelinquentme, I'm not certain, but between the hackerspace and work, which is actually mentally engaging and not soul crushing in the slightest, I could probably make it through five years required for a masters degree in cellular biology and molecular chemistry, which is what I'd go for11:57
TMAFourFire: It is mainly the leisure to pursue the learning -- the college might or might not be helpful in your knowledge quest.11:57
FourFireTMA, I'm afraid I couldn't parse your first sentence, care to rephrase?11:59
TMAFourFire: Sure. It'll take some rethinking.12:00
TMAFourFire: I would compare college to instant ramen or fastfood -- easily accessible knowledge in standardized packages. Passable but not quite gourmet nor healthy.12:02
FourFirefair enough, I'd compare it to politically correct food12:04
TMAFourFire: If your goal is to learn, then college might provide you with the basics. However in order to learn I think that it is more important to have the leisure to learn than any method -- college, self-study, MOOC, ...12:04
FourFireyou're 100% not weird according if you take university, and you automatically get some degree of respect from people who care about pieces of paper12:04
-!- CheckDavid [uid14990@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-xhnlxqlewjbnfxns] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]12:04
TMAthe paper -- it is the main bonus of college/university -- it boosts your earning power so you can have more leisure to learn later in life12:06
FourFireyeah, fair enough: the goal is to acquire the resources to actually have an impact on indefinite biological lifespan research, or it's lesser subgoal, life extension12:06
TMAI am not well versed in biology myself, but I take it that a good college is the fastest way to get the basics necessary for starting to make an impact.12:08
FourFireif that means I need a degree in order to work for SENS then so be it, if I can be an autodidact  and do the same more quickly (more doubtful, personally) then that.12:08
kanzurebiology is not a high-paying career12:08
FourFireI have taken college biology, I'm talking solely about University12:08
delinquentmeFourFire, its worth mentioning that those who funnel in money from other industries are doing as much good as SENS12:08
delinquentmeand what kanzure said12:09
kanzureif you enjoy being broke and poor then congratulations welcome to the glamorous life of biology12:09
FourFiredelinquentme, "other industries" don't capture my interest like biology does, and thus I predict I will be less productive12:09
delinquentmeFourFire, show me your passion by working a hard ass well paying job then finish up work and head to the lab12:10
FourFireI don't care about glamour or wealth either, I care about the end results, even if my short term motivation system is counter-productive12:10
delinquentmeHow passionate are you ?12:10
TMAdelinquentme: I have tried two universities. Only one of them was killing the creativity.12:12
FourFirehaving an odd 60 years of "upper middle class" lifestyle is worthless against multiple millennia of meh (and you probably get a much higher variation too)12:12
delinquentmeFourFire, i dont follow what you mean12:14
delinquentmeTMA do research if its what you truly want.12:14
delinquentmewhere im at I'm funneling my day job funds into research12:15
delinquentmeWith money: the lever gets much larger.12:15
FourFiredelinquentme, enough that my judgement is clouded regarding Eliezer's rather unorthodox outbursts because he proclaims death to be the enemy12:16
FourFiredelinquentme, what research? your own?12:16
delinquentmehehe He unfriended me because hes a social justice warrior12:18
delinquentmeFourFire, myself and a few friends12:18
-!- eudoxia [~eudoxia@r167-56-30-216.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy] has quit [Quit: Leaving]12:27
FourFiredelinquentme, I meant that a "good life" is worth very little compared to a "poor unglamorous" indefinite lifespan, which could well contain 60 years of wellbeing anyway12:28
delinquentmeFourFire, I think you're missing what my point is12:34
delinquentmeyou can spend your money however you like12:34
delinquentmebut just having it... will give you more options.12:35
FourFireyes you're implying that I could multiply my research effectiveness by earning money and donating it12:35
FourFireor that, yeah12:35
-!- CheckDavid [uid14990@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ijbgrnynrfthyvxx] has joined ##hplusroadmap12:36
FourFireI have a job, it's not well paying for me atm, but it's in a high margin business, and will be in the last half of jobs to be automated12:36
TMAnot well paying job in high margin business sounds like a very bad method of participation on that business -- better to own that business12:40
FourFireI'll get higher pay as soon as I stop being a trainee12:41
FourFireATM I get the crappy pay of 15.50 USD/Hour, but I get some perks in the job12:42
TMAFourFire: then you'll get more of the leisure I was talking about earlier -- leisure to pursue your learning or your research12:43
FourFireI am of the opinion that I lack the required personal qualities to own  successful business12:45
FourFireof course I haven't taken the opportunity to test this yet.12:45
FourFireI don't see myself doing so in the forseeable future as it would be a risky investment of the majority of my resources for an uncertain probability of attaining an uncertain gain12:46
TMAFourFire: based on my calculations and big mac index your salary would be slightly above average in the Czech Republic where I live; this translates to an elevated level of stress when trying to work and study with university imposed deadlines12:54
FourFireso that's bad?12:54
TMAFourFire: on the other hand you have said that your job is not of the soul-sucking variety; the overall level of stress might be easily comparable to one full time soul-sucking job with no other stressors12:56
TMAFourFire: so it might be doable :)12:56
TMAFourFire: the deadlines will force you to learn faster [and shallower] -- the price is stress, the gain is breadth of knowledge [I wouldn't have learned some things were they not compulsory part of the curriculum -- yet I find the insights obtained from them useful]13:01
TMAmaybe the best plan is to start, learn a little, network a lot and drop out -- several of the big enterpreneurs did just that13:02
-!- souljack [souljack@shell.xshellz.com] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]13:16
-!- FourFire [FourFire@2a02:270:2015:cafe:c148:1a38:1e7e:49f3] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]13:22
justanot1erusermaaku: I was thinking about incentive problems with freicoin then it hit me that freicoin has a double meaning13:37
-!- FourFire [FourFire@2a02:270:2015:cafe:c148:1a38:1e7e:49f3] has joined ##hplusroadmap13:58
FourFireTMA, again, I feel that I lack certain personality ... requirements to "network a lot" (and I don't primarily mean that I'm a spotty nerd with no social skills) I feel that the majority of the gain of going to university would be the knowledge shortly followed by the certification of holding a degree14:00
kanzurethat's insane14:02
FourFireI just don't think I'm entrepreneur material (and I can't even spell that word :(14:02
FourFirekanzure, in which way, I see several14:02
-!- night [~Adifex@unaffiliated/adifex] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]14:05
kanzureyou can just buy a certificate from lots of schools, try vietnam14:08
FourFirebut those certifications aren't worth much as a result14:13
FourFireand having loads of random certifications just looks like you're collecting them, which in the eyes of the people I want to seem credible to, would be actually bad :/14:14
-!- xrr [~xrr@gprs-inet-183-27.elisa.ee] has joined ##hplusroadmap14:16
-!- FourFire [FourFire@2a02:270:2015:cafe:c148:1a38:1e7e:49f3] has quit [Quit: Leaving]14:28
TMAFourFire: nowadays I would put the degree and certificate first and the knowledge second [because the knowledge can be pursued by other means].14:30
-!- drewbot_ [~cinch@ec2-107-22-1-5.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has joined ##hplusroadmap14:34
-!- delinquentme [~delinquen@162-245-22-166.v250d.PUBLIC.monkeybrains.net] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]14:36
-!- erasmus [~esb@unaffiliated/erasmus] has joined ##hplusroadmap14:39
-!- drewbot [~cinch@ec2-54-159-143-104.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]14:39
-!- erasmus [~esb@unaffiliated/erasmus] has quit [Quit: Namaste]14:44
-!- Qfwfq [~WashIrvin@unaffiliated/washirving] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]14:54
-!- Qfwfq [~WashIrvin@unaffiliated/washirving] has joined ##hplusroadmap14:59
archelsso I think I'm going to go for CircuiTikz after all to typeset these circuit diagrams15:14
archelsInkScape sounded nice in theory because of the freedom, but there are way too many mouseclicks involved15:14
kanzurebloop15:27
kanzurewell you could always write raw svg and load into inkscape?15:27
kanzurealthough why use inkscape for anything circuit related?15:28
-!- ebowden [~ebowden@CPE-144-131-35-125.vic.bigpond.net.au] has joined ##hplusroadmap15:32
-!- Zinglon [~Zinglon@ip565f6f48.direct-adsl.nl] has quit [Quit: Ping timeout: 245 seconds : USERID : UNIX : ByrdIRC]15:35
-!- Zinglon [~Zinglon@ip565f6f48.direct-adsl.nl] has joined ##hplusroadmap15:35
archelsbecause of freedom in case I need a new part, or need to customise something15:37
-!- drewbot_ [~cinch@ec2-107-22-1-5.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]15:42
-!- drewbot_ [~cinch@ec2-107-22-1-5.compute-1.amazonaws.com] has joined ##hplusroadmap15:43
-!- Zinglon [~Zinglon@ip565f6f48.direct-adsl.nl] has quit [Quit: Ping timeout: 264 seconds : USERID : UNIX : ByrdIRC]15:48
-!- Zinglon [~Zinglon@ip565f6f48.direct-adsl.nl] has joined ##hplusroadmap15:49
-!- delinquentme [~delinquen@162-245-22-166.v250d.PUBLIC.monkeybrains.net] has joined ##hplusroadmap16:09
-!- chris_99 [~chris_99@unaffiliated/chris-99/x-3062929] has quit [Quit: Ex-Chat]16:12
-!- justanot1eruser is now known as justanotheruser16:20
nmz787archels: why not use inkscape?16:31
nmz787archels: if you want to write some custom software, and are also interested in autorouting, maybe we can collaborate16:31
nmz787archels: s/inkscape/kicad/16:31
nmz787my fingers typed from the wrong memory buffer16:32
-!- night [~Adifex@unaffiliated/adifex] has joined ##hplusroadmap16:34
kanzurelogging log collector http://www.fluentd.org/17:01
maakujustanotheruser: double-meaning?17:05
-!- Zinglon [~Zinglon@ip565f6f48.direct-adsl.nl] has quit [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]17:06
maaku.help .tell17:06
yoleauxRelay a telegram to someone17:06
maaku.tell maaku testing17:06
yoleauxmaaku: Talking to yourself is the first sign of madness.17:06
maakuhah17:06
maaku.tell FourFire fuck utility; take what you're interested in college. art history? philosophy? whatever. drop your job as the opportunity cost is too high and self-learn bio-engineering, comp sci, or whatever transhumanist contribution you want to make. establish a reputation by coding.17:10
yoleauxmaaku: I'll pass your message to FourFire.17:10
kanzurei'm not really sure where to make money in norway17:11
justanotherusermaaku: is there not supposed to be a double meaning?17:12
justanotheruser"frei"?17:12
maakukanzure: he may have to move elsewhere after university17:14
maakuit comes from 'freigeld', Gesell's proposed currency, which itself did have a double-meaning i think17:14
maakuit's not a play on my name as many people think (different root, spelled differently)17:15
maaku'freigeld' does literally mean 'free money'17:15
kanzureinstead of university he could spend that time making money17:16
kanzure"notmysurnamemarket"17:16
maakuhaha now that was a double meaning17:17
justanotheruserok neverming17:17
maakuwe were absolutely going for 'free markets' in 'freimarkets'17:17
maakujustanotheruser: but seriously what was the two meanings you thought? i want to know in case there's a branding issue17:17
justanotherusermaaku: well now theres threeish17:18
justanotheruserI thought it was just german-free coin17:18
maakuwhich it is, go on17:18
justanotheruserthen I realized it was made by mark frei-17:19
justanotheruserbut I assume its actually made by mark frie17:19
maakuheh yeah. 'frie-' means peaceful, 'frei-' mean free17:20
maakuthat one's absolutely a coincidence. besides freigeld predating freicoin by about 100 years, jorge coined the 'freicoin' before i found the project17:21
maakubtw what was the incentive issue?17:21
justanotheruserwhile demmurage may be good for society as a whole, it is bad for an individual17:22
justanotheruserI'm still skeptical that society can be efficient with a deflationary currency17:23
justanotheruseror at least as efficient as it is now17:24
maakuah well that's a complicated one to answer in one sentence, but it comes down that in an economy based on demurrage currency real prices are lower17:25
justanotheruseryep.17:25
maakudue to effects on interest rates17:25
maakua longer discussion probably deserves to be on #freicoin17:25
justanotheruserthe incentive problem isn't so much something that breaks freicoin as something that hurts adoption17:26
kanzureworking capital accumulation and saving sounds like a useful thing to me17:26
kanzureinstead of financing crazy projects with crazy amounts of debt, you can just finance stuff by doing good work17:26
justanotheruserkanzure: in practice it has been problematic17:26
kanzurein what practice tho17:27
justanotheruserI'm not sure how to answer that17:27
justanotheruserbut maybe the answer is an example of a country using a deflationary currency?17:27
kanzurebitcoin is a first17:27
kanzurethere has been been an actually scarce money17:27
justanotherusernot gold?17:27
justanotheruserinb4 alchemy17:28
kanzurenobody uses gold like that because it's inconvenient17:28
maakujustanotheruser: right, once adopted the benefit should be obvious by comparison, but you don't get those benefits until a large part of the supply chain starts accepting free money (free by Gesell's definition)17:30
kanzuremaaku: i have some complaints about the costs of capital equipment17:31
justanotheruserkanzure: there have been convenient gold based currencies17:31
maakukanzure: don't we all :)17:31
kanzurethat's just paper gold17:31
justanotherusersure17:31
kanzurealso the actual available supply of gold is not known, so why would anyone know if the total amount of paper gold adds up?17:31
justanotheruserthey wouldn't17:32
kanzurefascinating17:32
justanotheruserlol17:32
justanotheruserthe currency wasn't trustless17:32
kanzurehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFods1KSWsQ17:32
maakujustanotheruser: there is Woergl to point to17:34
-!- archels_ [charl@toad.stack.nl] has joined ##hplusroadmap17:35
maakubut i'm more interested in what you get when you combine freicoin scarce money with (old-)ripple credit (both tend towards 0% interest) and commodity basket units of account17:36
maakuthat's the direction we are slowly headed towards in freicoin17:36
maaku(with freimarket extensions)17:36
-!- JayDugger1 [~jwdugger@pool-173-57-55-138.dllstx.fios.verizon.net] has joined ##hplusroadmap17:37
-!- delinquentme_ [~delinquen@162-245-22-166.v250d.PUBLIC.monkeybrains.net] has joined ##hplusroadmap17:38
-!- ParahSailin_ [~parahsail@unaffiliated/parahsailin] has joined ##hplusroadmap17:41
-!- archels [charl@unaffiliated/archels] has quit [Write error: Connection reset by peer]17:43
-!- delinquentme [~delinquen@162-245-22-166.v250d.PUBLIC.monkeybrains.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]17:43
-!- JayDugger [~jwdugger@pool-173-57-55-138.dllstx.fios.verizon.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]17:43
-!- cursive [~sqrt@unaffiliated/cursive] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]17:43
-!- poohbear [~tigger@unaffiliated/tigger] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]17:43
-!- faceface [~dbolser@nat8021.ebi.ac.uk] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]17:43
-!- drazak [~bleh@198.52.199.197] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]17:43
-!- andytoshi [~andytoshi@unaffiliated/andytoshi] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]17:43
-!- ParahSailin [~parahsail@unaffiliated/parahsailin] has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]17:43
justanotheruserbut you can still study the economic effects of a deflationary currency17:43
-!- cursive [~sqrt@54.84.83.73] has joined ##hplusroadmap17:43
-!- cursive [~sqrt@54.84.83.73] has quit [Client Quit]17:43
-!- Netsplit *.net <-> *.split quits: dpk, Urchin, lichen17:43
-!- faceface_ [~dbolser@nat8021.ebi.ac.uk] has joined ##hplusroadmap17:43
-!- poohbear [~poohbear@unaffiliated/tigger] has joined ##hplusroadmap17:44
justanotheruserI don't think the economics change that much even when you have a trusted party controlling the currency17:44
-!- drazak_ [~bleh@198.52.199.197] has joined ##hplusroadmap17:44
-!- andytoshi [~andytoshi@wpsoftware.net] has joined ##hplusroadmap17:44
-!- Netsplit over, joins: lichen, dpk, Urchin17:48
justanotherusermaaku: so freimarkets is being developed for bitcoin and everything from bitcoin including sidechains etc will be moved to freicoin as soon as its ready?17:52
maakujustanotheruser: once it is open sourced by blockstream, it can be ported. jorge and I have written into our employment contracts permission to do exactly this even if it were to pose a conflict of interest to blockstream17:59
maaku(which it doesn't at this time, and I don't foresee it being a conflict, but just in case we insisted on that clause)17:59
maakujorge's full time job right now is basically implementing a confined-scope version of freimarkets17:59
justanotheruseryes, I wouldn't expect it to be a short term conflict given the market caps no offense :x18:08
maakuwell even if freicoin completely overtook bitcoin (one can dream), it should affect BSC. we make our money on currency-neutral services18:14
maaku*it should not18:44
-!- ebowden [~ebowden@CPE-144-131-35-125.vic.bigpond.net.au] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]19:08
-!- cntrational [~sid@49.205.77.125] has joined ##hplusroadmap19:08
-!- cntrational [~sid@49.205.77.125] has quit [Client Quit]19:09
-!- Viper168 [~Viper@unaffiliated/viper168] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]19:28
-!- ebowden [~ebowden@CPE-144-131-35-125.vic.bigpond.net.au] has joined ##hplusroadmap19:36
-!- AmbulatoryCortex [~Ambulator@173-31-9-188.client.mchsi.com] has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]19:56
-!- delinquentme_ [~delinquen@162-245-22-166.v250d.PUBLIC.monkeybrains.net] has quit [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]20:12
nmz787sheena: does the speed of dispensing for the cheese matter? i.e. slowly over 5 seconds versus a 'real quick squirt'?20:29
-!- cntrational [~sid@49.205.77.125] has joined ##hplusroadmap20:38
-!- cntrational [~sid@49.205.77.125] has quit [Quit: WeeChat 1.2-dev]21:05
nmz787sheena: this is what I have so far, it isn't much but I am still learning this CAD system http://www.3dvieweronline.com/share/Y9Ma7JmyO0wKZyY/Y9Ma7JmyO0wKZyY21:33
-!- phm4242 [~o@boole.london.hackspace.org.uk] has joined ##hplusroadmap21:39
-!- Viper168 [~Viper@unaffiliated/viper168] has joined ##hplusroadmap21:51
-!- phm4242 [~o@boole.london.hackspace.org.uk] has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]21:58
-!- phm4242 [~o@boole.london.hackspace.org.uk] has joined ##hplusroadmap22:02
-!- soylentbomb [~k@unaffiliated/soylentbomb] has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]22:29
-!- xrr [~xrr@gprs-inet-183-27.elisa.ee] has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]22:37
-!- CheckDavid [uid14990@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ijbgrnynrfthyvxx] has quit [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]22:54
JayDugger1Good morning, everyone.23:06
-!- ebowden [~ebowden@CPE-144-131-35-125.vic.bigpond.net.au] has quit [Remote host closed the connection]23:16
--- Log closed Sun Feb 01 00:00:41 2015

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.0.dev0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!